| Author: |
[Pro Football] Topic: Seattle at Chicago (12/02/2012) |
|
Covers |
 View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports | |
Covers Referee
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 61
Location: Ireland |
#1 Posted: 11/27/2012 1:53:13 AM
Away: Seattle
[7-4 ATS]
Home: Chicago
[6-5 ATS]
Game Time:
1:00 PM
Stadium: Soldier Field
Recent Meetings:
N/A
Team Leaders:
Seattle:
Passing:
Russell Wilson
(2051)
Rushing:
Marshawn Lynch
(1051)
Receiving:
Sidney Rice
(524)
Chicago:
Passing:
Jay Cutler
(2002)
Rushing:
Matt Forte
(683)
Receiving:
Brandon Marshall
(1017)
More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information
|
|
quote |
|
king_of_diamond |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1538
Location: |
#2 Posted: 11/28/2012 11:46:35 PM |
|
quote |
|
dooom |
RSI  |
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 510
Location: Quebec |
#3 Posted: 11/29/2012 12:06:58 AM
Seahawks are 6-1 ATS in their last 7 games following a ATS loss.
|
|
quote |
|
THEMUGG |
RSI  |
Hall of Fame
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 27442
Location: Washington |
#4 Posted: 11/29/2012 2:14:43 AM
|
|
quote |
|
moviefan |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 52
Location: Illinois |
#5 Posted: 11/29/2012 8:33:02 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by dooom: I like Seahawks +3.5 in this spot..laying on seahawks with forte out
Seahawks are 6-1 ATS in their last 7 games following a ATS loss.
Seattle is also 1-5 on the road. But it's suppose to be 60° here Sunday so "Bear" weather is not going to be a factor. |
|
quote |
|
|
|
Sammy_Ace |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 188
Location: New York |
#6 Posted: 11/29/2012 12:52:33 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
Browner & Sherman will be playing.........a nightmare for Cutler & Bears fans. Got Seattle +4
I agree. I thought the Vikings would play the Bears tougher last week and got hurt fading the Bears. The Bears were smart and exposed the Vikings with a lot of 3 step drops and short passes. This was a smart plan to keep Cutler safe, but I think the Seahawks match up much better against this team. They have the corners to man up and can bring the blitz against a very shakey offensive line that will be without the services of right guard Lance Louis, who was absolutely leveled by Jared Allen last week.
I worry about the Seahawks being able to move the ball against this defense. My hope is that the Bears will be a step slower on the defensive side of the ball. Lance Briggs will definitely not be a 100% as he was seen walking around in a boot after last week's game. And Tillman, one of the best corners in the league, is still listed as questionable with an ankle injury. I don't think Seattle will "light up the scoreboard" at Soldier Field this Sunday, but I think they have the tools in play a very competitive game. Just keep in mind who the Bears have faced the past few weeks: the 49ers led by Frank Gore, the Vikings led by AP (who surprisingly came up w a 100 yd day despite a losing effort), and now the Seahawks led by Marshawn Lynch. Seems like their defense can't catch a break and are going up against some of the best running games in the league in 3 consecutive weeks.
Having Devin Hester out doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me given he hasn't done much all season, but its still one less thing Seattle doesn't have to account for. And for those of you who forgot, Alshon Jeffery just had his knee scoped, so he won't be in action. It would seem the Bears just don't have the right personnel to light up the scoreboard. Obviosuly Brandon Marshall is always a threat, but the Seahawks will have the medicine for him and probably mimic the 49er gameplan from 2 weeks ago.
The Bears only put up 3 points in last weeks second half, and I don't think that bodes well for them when they step up in class and play the Seahawks defense.
I guess what I am trying to say is I like the Seahawks to win or lose this game by a fg or so, in a low scoring game.
Seattle 17
Chicago 13
good luck |
|
quote |
|
Buddhabud |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 288
Location: Georgia |
#7 Posted: 11/29/2012 7:02:14 PM |
|
quote |
|
king_of_diamond |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1538
Location: |
#8 Posted: 11/29/2012 8:05:33 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by dooom: I like Seahawks +3.5 in this spot..laying on seahawks with forte out
Forte should play. He probably won't get 20+ carries, but he should see some action. That really won't sway my opinion one way or the other. Forte has not been a big factor for the bears offense all season. He hasn't even been involved much in the passing game. They might be better off playing bush from the start. Still like the bears in this one as long as cutler's playing, and I'm not a jay cutler fan. The Seahawks on the road is all I need to feel safe with this one. |
|
quote |
|
toddwins |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 318
Location: Ontario |
#9 Posted: 11/30/2012 2:05:11 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by king_of_diamond:
Forte should play. He probably won't get 20+ carries, but he should see some action. That really won't sway my opinion one way or the other. Forte has not been a big factor for the bears offense all season. He hasn't even been involved much in the passing game. They might be better off playing bush from the start. Still like the bears in this one as long as cutler's playing, and I'm not a jay cutler fan. The Seahawks on the road is all I need to feel safe with this one.
The past does not equal the future.....just because Seattle isn't a "road" team, that doesn't mean they can't beat a Bears team with a banged up "O" line.........and Bears offense is ranked 31st by the metrics used by brian burke at advancednfl stats.........Seattle is hungry, I say they will win |
|
quote |
|
TheGreatest12 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 137
Location: Colorado |
#10 Posted: 11/30/2012 5:09:40 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by Buddhabud:
Line seems a little low with Cutler playing.I'll lay the points and take the Bears.
I agree fishy line, I'm laying the points.
Chi -3.5 |
|
quote |
|
XSixburghX |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 41
Location: Nevada |
#11 Posted: 11/30/2012 5:10:18 AM
Bears 17 Seahawks 10 |
|
quote |
|
joedaddy76 |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 278
Location: Nevada |
#12 Posted: 11/30/2012 12:39:59 PM this game scares me. impulsively, i wanna take Chicago with the revenge factor ( Hanie was QB in last year's debacle ), but then i struggle to see many points on the board by either team which makes the hook look harder to cover. the rain will fall thru Chicago over the weekend, making this a game in the trenches where i feel Seattle has just as much talent on both sides of the ball.
my heart says Chicago, but my mind says stay away. Hawks seem to travel well to Chicago. |
|
quote |
|
TheQuadYeah |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1143
Location: |
#13 Posted: 11/30/2012 6:43:14 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by TheGreatest12:
I agree fishy line, I'm laying the points.
Chi -3.5
Yep - second road game in a row for the Sea-Turkeys, second Soldier Field home game for the Bears. Not overthinking this one...........
Bears -3.5
|
|
quote |
|
W-Rod |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 26
Location: Mexico |
#14 Posted: 12/1/2012 12:12:38 AM |
|
quote |
|
phat1pc |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 104
Location: |
#15 Posted: 12/1/2012 5:56:49 PM this game scares me being a bears fan.. the bears are so banged up right now and that offensive line is brutal.. the seahawks even though they suck on the road they dont get blown out.. they are in every game.. i just see the bears coming out flat in this one for some reason.. going with the seachickens..gimme the points |
|
quote |
|
doctor_alfa |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 85
Location: Venezuela |
#16 Posted: 12/1/2012 6:50:16 PM |
|
quote |
|
MyTimeToShine |
RSI  |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 224
Location: New Jersey |
#17 Posted: 12/1/2012 8:13:26 PM This is the most suspect line ive seen in awhile. Your 1st instinct is goin large on Chi town. This is WAY too scary for me. They know somethin that we dont as usual, Gimme the SeaTurds or no play. These teams are kinda similiar and Chi is banged up |
|
quote |
|
VEGASRKNZ |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 86
Location: Nevada |
#18 Posted: 12/1/2012 9:51:26 PM |
|
quote |
|
jorge112270 |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8669
Location: Texas |
#19 Posted: 12/1/2012 11:13:39 PM |
|
quote |
|
Properfix |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 103
Location: Canada |
#20 Posted: 12/1/2012 11:29:13 PM F _ _ k Seattle... They are a bad road team. I'm taking the better football team at home at less than a touchdown and living with the result. I'm astonished that Chicago isn't favored by more, I'm cashing in on that mistake. Who's with me??? PICK: Bears -3 |
|
quote |
|
QMICH |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2962
Location: United States |
#21 Posted: 12/1/2012 11:52:59 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by king_of_diamond:
Regardless, I feel as long as cutler plays (and he should) I like the bears. 
The Seahawks are playing their second of back to back road games. They'll also be without both of their starting corner backs.
The only thing that has me slightly concerned is that it looks like the bears will be heavily bet by the public this week and I tend to stay away from those situations. 
CUTLER IS ALWAYS A TOTAL CRAPSHOOT, BOTH SEATTLE STARTING CORNERS ARE PLAYING AND THE PUBLIC IS ALL OVER CHICAGO.
PLAYING SEA +4 FOR 3 UNITS |
|
quote |
|
vue21849 |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2321
Location: South Carolina |
#22 Posted: 12/1/2012 11:53:11 PM
CHICAGO - 3 |
|
quote |
|
DrDogs |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1322
Location: Tennessee |
#23 Posted: 12/1/2012 11:54:35 PM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
mgmprofits |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 341
Location: |
#24 Posted: 12/2/2012 12:21:06 AM |
|
quote |
|
jr3527 |
RSI |
Prospect
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 126
Location: United States |
#25 Posted: 12/2/2012 12:52:03 AM |
|
quote |