The drizzle... So I guess that means it's automatic huh? Bet Virginia -14 and let me know how that works out, Mr Square. The Bulls played back to back tonight and got 8 points. Yet won outright. Shot happens
The drizzle... So I guess that means it's automatic huh? Bet Virginia -14 and let me know how that works out, Mr Square. The Bulls played back to back tonight and got 8 points. Yet won outright. Shot happens
[Quote: Originally Posted by timdogs17] The drizzle... So I guess that means it's automatic huh? Bet Virginia -14 and let me know how that works out, Mr Square. The Bulls played back to back tonight and got 8 points. Yet won outright. Shot happens [/Quote
Ok, this is the ultimate example of complete communication breakdown. You take one thing I said and build a completely different foundation with your own rant.
IS IT OR IS IT NOT FACT THAT VIRGINIA HAS WON BY DOUBLE DIGITS IN 7 OF ITS LAST 9 GAMES.
After you answer yes to that....
DID THE OP OF THIS THREAD SAY THAT VIRGINIA'S OFFENSE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO LAY DD'S?
After you answer yes to that...
Piece the two questions together. Then understand why I would question somebody for saying that Virginia's offense can't lay double digit points when they have done it in almost every game the last two months.
Then I want you to show me how pointing out a fact makes me a square bettor, how I think it will be automatic, and how this has anything to do with the Chicago Bulls.
Boy I try to see the world through some of your eyes, but I just can't get my head that far up my behind.
[Quote: Originally Posted by timdogs17] The drizzle... So I guess that means it's automatic huh? Bet Virginia -14 and let me know how that works out, Mr Square. The Bulls played back to back tonight and got 8 points. Yet won outright. Shot happens [/Quote
Ok, this is the ultimate example of complete communication breakdown. You take one thing I said and build a completely different foundation with your own rant.
IS IT OR IS IT NOT FACT THAT VIRGINIA HAS WON BY DOUBLE DIGITS IN 7 OF ITS LAST 9 GAMES.
After you answer yes to that....
DID THE OP OF THIS THREAD SAY THAT VIRGINIA'S OFFENSE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO LAY DD'S?
After you answer yes to that...
Piece the two questions together. Then understand why I would question somebody for saying that Virginia's offense can't lay double digit points when they have done it in almost every game the last two months.
Then I want you to show me how pointing out a fact makes me a square bettor, how I think it will be automatic, and how this has anything to do with the Chicago Bulls.
Boy I try to see the world through some of your eyes, but I just can't get my head that far up my behind.
1) what rant? 2) what Virginia did in their last 7-9 games has what affect with tomorrow's opponent ? 3) upsets happen 4) like I said 14 is way to many points. I haven't looked into the game that much yet. Just look at my thread for "Tuesday". I hit a (4) team parlay that paid $1,100 .. Pacers ML-140 Ohio state +6 St Johns +4.5 Bruins -185 ---- I'm not saying Boston College will cover the 14 (Yet). I'm saying that's a lot of points. No disrespect . But I'll most likely take the points bc Virginia covered the last 7 out of 9... Doesn't mean they win Easy tomorrow. Maybe by 10
1) what rant? 2) what Virginia did in their last 7-9 games has what affect with tomorrow's opponent ? 3) upsets happen 4) like I said 14 is way to many points. I haven't looked into the game that much yet. Just look at my thread for "Tuesday". I hit a (4) team parlay that paid $1,100 .. Pacers ML-140 Ohio state +6 St Johns +4.5 Bruins -185 ---- I'm not saying Boston College will cover the 14 (Yet). I'm saying that's a lot of points. No disrespect . But I'll most likely take the points bc Virginia covered the last 7 out of 9... Doesn't mean they win Easy tomorrow. Maybe by 10
"BOSTON COLLEGE(+14) vs Virginia : Great defensive team but Virg doesn't have the offense good enough to lay DDs"
Except for the last 7 out of 9 games they played.
Not sure bout the comment but my thinking was VIRGINIA has put up 80 ONCE ALL YEAR Missouri St and BC averages 70 so Im looking for a little letdown after huge PITT win and BC to keep it close and lo and behold
LINE UPDATE
BOSTON COLLEGE(+16) vs Virginia: Bookie loves Virginia
"BOSTON COLLEGE(+14) vs Virginia : Great defensive team but Virg doesn't have the offense good enough to lay DDs"
Except for the last 7 out of 9 games they played.
Not sure bout the comment but my thinking was VIRGINIA has put up 80 ONCE ALL YEAR Missouri St and BC averages 70 so Im looking for a little letdown after huge PITT win and BC to keep it close and lo and behold
LINE UPDATE
BOSTON COLLEGE(+16) vs Virginia: Bookie loves Virginia
Covers is a great fkn invention for YOU FELLAS that use it for its full advantage. I learn so much from each and everyone of you guys and I Thank YOU so much for participating.
I am one capper who has increased his bankroll here and my wish is for all of you to enjoy the miracle of the internet. REMEMBER WHEN........We had just newspapers and rumours......
Covers is a great fkn invention for YOU FELLAS that use it for its full advantage. I learn so much from each and everyone of you guys and I Thank YOU so much for participating.
I am one capper who has increased his bankroll here and my wish is for all of you to enjoy the miracle of the internet. REMEMBER WHEN........We had just newspapers and rumours......
MICHIGAN(-13) vs Huskers: Its taken some time for Michigan to get back to reality since the MSU win as they struggled to put away Purdont and got steamed by Hoosiers but tonight they have new BIG 10 whipping boy coming into town.
MICH IS 3-0-1 ATS after a loss
MICH IS 5-1 when laying DDs
GOOD LUCK FELLAS
PS: Like under 136 as well but will not post it until I bet it
MICHIGAN(-13) vs Huskers: Its taken some time for Michigan to get back to reality since the MSU win as they struggled to put away Purdont and got steamed by Hoosiers but tonight they have new BIG 10 whipping boy coming into town.
MICH IS 3-0-1 ATS after a loss
MICH IS 5-1 when laying DDs
GOOD LUCK FELLAS
PS: Like under 136 as well but will not post it until I bet it
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.