YTD: 127-128 +25.00 units
Marshall +5 (-105) 1u
I don't find this necessarily to be the case.
Often times, the underdog is undervalued on the opening line because of public perception. This happens in baseball a lot... I was able to absolutely rake by betting primarly underdogs on the opening line because perception caused an inflated opener towards the favorite.
I think that may have happened with Ohio today. BetOnline threw out a +7 yesterday at the open and I grabbed it, and they may have done so because Ohio just lost to an inferior Robert Morris team.
To me, there really is no tried and true rule. I've seen people say bet favorites early, underdogs late, and I just don't believe it's that cut and dry. I've seen favorites undervalued at the open also. It all comes down to public perception and how the books take that perception into account when opening a number.
I don't find this necessarily to be the case.
Often times, the underdog is undervalued on the opening line because of public perception. This happens in baseball a lot... I was able to absolutely rake by betting primarly underdogs on the opening line because perception caused an inflated opener towards the favorite.
I think that may have happened with Ohio today. BetOnline threw out a +7 yesterday at the open and I grabbed it, and they may have done so because Ohio just lost to an inferior Robert Morris team.
To me, there really is no tried and true rule. I've seen people say bet favorites early, underdogs late, and I just don't believe it's that cut and dry. I've seen favorites undervalued at the open also. It all comes down to public perception and how the books take that perception into account when opening a number.
Still respectfully disagree... I've seen many, many instances in all sports of underdogs getting less than 25% of the action and still the line moves toward the underdog.
Public money does not move lines. Sharp money does.
Still respectfully disagree... I've seen many, many instances in all sports of underdogs getting less than 25% of the action and still the line moves toward the underdog.
Public money does not move lines. Sharp money does.
Still respectfully disagree... I've seen many, many instances in all sports of underdogs getting less than 25% of the action and still the line moves toward the underdog.
Public money does not move lines. Sharp money does.
Adding to this... USC is a perfect example today.
Over 90% of the money is on New Mexico at a square book I just checked, and yet USC opened +11 at BetCris and it's now down to +9.5 at most shops.
Still respectfully disagree... I've seen many, many instances in all sports of underdogs getting less than 25% of the action and still the line moves toward the underdog.
Public money does not move lines. Sharp money does.
Adding to this... USC is a perfect example today.
Over 90% of the money is on New Mexico at a square book I just checked, and yet USC opened +11 at BetCris and it's now down to +9.5 at most shops.
Sports Interaction is a notoriously square book that has betting %'s for each game. If you go to their site and click on the little bubble next to the USC-New Mexico game, you'll see over 90% of the bets placed on New Mexico... which is perfectly understandable, considering Joe Public has no interest in betting this USC team based on their recent performances.
Watch a little bit later today, and I guarantee you both Sports Interaction and Bovada will begin to shade their line towards New Mexico to protect themselves from the onslaught of Lobos bets by their clients (i.e. sharp books such as Pinny throwing out New Mexico -9 and SIA and Bovada throwing out a -9.5... this will typically happen as tip off nears.)
This is a classic case of an underdog nobody wants to bet and the line moving in the direction of that underdog. This isn't always the case... it's entirely possible for squares and sharps to be on the same side (i.e. Florida) but that's still sharp money moving the line, not public money.
Sports Interaction is a notoriously square book that has betting %'s for each game. If you go to their site and click on the little bubble next to the USC-New Mexico game, you'll see over 90% of the bets placed on New Mexico... which is perfectly understandable, considering Joe Public has no interest in betting this USC team based on their recent performances.
Watch a little bit later today, and I guarantee you both Sports Interaction and Bovada will begin to shade their line towards New Mexico to protect themselves from the onslaught of Lobos bets by their clients (i.e. sharp books such as Pinny throwing out New Mexico -9 and SIA and Bovada throwing out a -9.5... this will typically happen as tip off nears.)
This is a classic case of an underdog nobody wants to bet and the line moving in the direction of that underdog. This isn't always the case... it's entirely possible for squares and sharps to be on the same side (i.e. Florida) but that's still sharp money moving the line, not public money.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.