Jfen I haven't been betting college basketball long but every time I take a game +4 or under unless they win outright if northern Iowa down by a few they always foul and I always lose I always think about taking them su. I think they can win su
0
Jfen I haven't been betting college basketball long but every time I take a game +4 or under unless they win outright if northern Iowa down by a few they always foul and I always lose I always think about taking them su. I think they can win su
Sorry, I know the game started, but leaned slightly to Miami here. Getting Durand Scott back in the lineup is a BIG deal. He and Larkin are pretty dynamic. Reggie Johnson has been on a tear early in the season and I don't think UDM has any answer for him inside. Fast-paced game that probably favors the home team with more offensive weapons.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mariner24:
jfen u have any thoughts on detroit catching 7?
Sorry, I know the game started, but leaned slightly to Miami here. Getting Durand Scott back in the lineup is a BIG deal. He and Larkin are pretty dynamic. Reggie Johnson has been on a tear early in the season and I don't think UDM has any answer for him inside. Fast-paced game that probably favors the home team with more offensive weapons.
Jfen I haven't been betting college basketball long but every time I take a game +4 or under unless they win outright if northern Iowa down by a few they always foul and I always lose I always think about taking them su. I think they can win su
There are two schools of thought on this matter:
1) "Always take the points no matter what"
2) "A small underdog that covers will probably win so you should maximize your profits by taking the money line."
Neither side is necessarily "right" or "wrong." I prefer the first approach as the opportunity for backdoor covers is something not available when playing underdog moneylines. A team catching 4 points can be down by as many as 6 on the final possession and still cover the line. For me, the probative value of playing small moneylines does not outweigh the risk of your team losing yet still covering the line.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Wolfeman82:
Jfen I haven't been betting college basketball long but every time I take a game +4 or under unless they win outright if northern Iowa down by a few they always foul and I always lose I always think about taking them su. I think they can win su
There are two schools of thought on this matter:
1) "Always take the points no matter what"
2) "A small underdog that covers will probably win so you should maximize your profits by taking the money line."
Neither side is necessarily "right" or "wrong." I prefer the first approach as the opportunity for backdoor covers is something not available when playing underdog moneylines. A team catching 4 points can be down by as many as 6 on the final possession and still cover the line. For me, the probative value of playing small moneylines does not outweigh the risk of your team losing yet still covering the line.
I hit Gardner Webb +18.5 tomorrow as my first play of the year. Definitely think this is your type of play, seems like a really bad spot for the Illini.
BOL today.
0
What's up buddy... been awhile.
I hit Gardner Webb +18.5 tomorrow as my first play of the year. Definitely think this is your type of play, seems like a really bad spot for the Illini.
Train - Tough loss on the UD-Manhattan game. To be honest, I'm not sure there was a right side there. Manhattan led late in the game but Dayton missed soooo many free throws that could have put it out of reach early in the game.
Tone - Good to hear from you, man. I will definitely be on Gardner-Webb, perhaps both first half and game. Gonna be tough for the Illini to get up for that one, especially on a Sunday after Thanksgiving.
Turnstone - 1000% agree. Changes EVERYTHING in this game. One of the few times all year I will make a play almost solely based on a last-minute injury announcement.
0
Train - Tough loss on the UD-Manhattan game. To be honest, I'm not sure there was a right side there. Manhattan led late in the game but Dayton missed soooo many free throws that could have put it out of reach early in the game.
Tone - Good to hear from you, man. I will definitely be on Gardner-Webb, perhaps both first half and game. Gonna be tough for the Illini to get up for that one, especially on a Sunday after Thanksgiving.
Turnstone - 1000% agree. Changes EVERYTHING in this game. One of the few times all year I will make a play almost solely based on a last-minute injury announcement.
Nice hit on the over TCU. Im looking at BYU against Cal Northridge and am looking to play BYU. Also Neb Kent St. Kent St has some interesting games played so far and believe they can hang with Neb, Would appreciate your thoughts if you have time.
0
Nice hit on the over TCU. Im looking at BYU against Cal Northridge and am looking to play BYU. Also Neb Kent St. Kent St has some interesting games played so far and believe they can hang with Neb, Would appreciate your thoughts if you have time.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.