Thanks in advance.
It amazes me how ignorant the average anti-2A person is. Back in 94 they ranted and raved about how evil “assault weapons” were in order to get them banned. They couldn’t care less what the guns could actually do. They simply went after the ones that looked “evil.”
They went after AR-15’s because they looked “menacing,” but left Mini-14’s alone because they looked like hunting weapons even though they have pretty much the same capabilities.
These are the same geniuses that tried to ban pistol grips on rifles and shotguns because they claimed that pistol grips were designed to allow the shooter to fire the weapon from the hip and firing the weapon from the hip magically makes the gun more deadly.
It cracks me up how these simpletons think “assault weapons” are death machines while other semi-automatic rifles that accept high capacity magazines are somehow less deadly simply because they don’t look as scary.
Oh, and do you know what happened after the last ban? The only thing that changed was the prices went up. That’s it. You could still get whatever you wanted; you just had to pay more for it.
In addition very little gun crime involves “assault weapons,” yet the far-left thinks banning them will make a huge impact.
It amazes me how ignorant the average anti-2A person is. Back in 94 they ranted and raved about how evil “assault weapons” were in order to get them banned. They couldn’t care less what the guns could actually do. They simply went after the ones that looked “evil.”
They went after AR-15’s because they looked “menacing,” but left Mini-14’s alone because they looked like hunting weapons even though they have pretty much the same capabilities.
These are the same geniuses that tried to ban pistol grips on rifles and shotguns because they claimed that pistol grips were designed to allow the shooter to fire the weapon from the hip and firing the weapon from the hip magically makes the gun more deadly.
It cracks me up how these simpletons think “assault weapons” are death machines while other semi-automatic rifles that accept high capacity magazines are somehow less deadly simply because they don’t look as scary.
Oh, and do you know what happened after the last ban? The only thing that changed was the prices went up. That’s it. You could still get whatever you wanted; you just had to pay more for it.
In addition very little gun crime involves “assault weapons,” yet the far-left thinks banning them will make a huge impact.
If you own an assault rifle or offer them for sale, immediately get sent to prison for 15 to 20 years.
If citizens are allowed to purchase assult rifles, they should also be allowed to purchase hand grenades and bombs. They are both used for the sole purpose of killing as many people as possible.
If you own an assault rifle or offer them for sale, immediately get sent to prison for 15 to 20 years.
If citizens are allowed to purchase assult rifles, they should also be allowed to purchase hand grenades and bombs. They are both used for the sole purpose of killing as many people as possible.
If you own an assault rifle or offer them for sale, immediately get sent to prison for 15 to 20 years.
If citizens are allowed to purchase assult rifles, they should also be allowed to purchase hand grenades and bombs. They are both used for the sole purpose of killing as many people as possible.
And how exactly do you propose the government goes about implementing and enforcing that ban?
If you own an assault rifle or offer them for sale, immediately get sent to prison for 15 to 20 years.
If citizens are allowed to purchase assult rifles, they should also be allowed to purchase hand grenades and bombs. They are both used for the sole purpose of killing as many people as possible.
And how exactly do you propose the government goes about implementing and enforcing that ban?
Post #12
Post #12
And if any of those countries had over 300 million citizens owning over 300 million guns that might be relevant.
And if any of those countries had over 300 million citizens owning over 300 million guns that might be relevant.
the so called 'War on Drugs" has proven you can get ANYTHING you want IF you have the cash
besides, any "prohibition" would probably "grandfather in" anyone owning an assault style rifle OR extended magazine SO it would probably be just another "band-aid" approach
the so called 'War on Drugs" has proven you can get ANYTHING you want IF you have the cash
besides, any "prohibition" would probably "grandfather in" anyone owning an assault style rifle OR extended magazine SO it would probably be just another "band-aid" approach
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.