Messages

Forum Index : Penalty Box : Messages Page 4 of 5  1 2 3 4 5  
Author: [Penalty Box] Topic: If they start teaching 2nd graders that boys can marry boys then . .
wasabitobiko send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
wasabitobiko
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1202
Location:
#76
Posted: 10/24/2008 1:39:01 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:

Don't be silly. All people are different and unique from one person to the next. My argument is with the theory that people are born happy. Simply not true and not even scientifically proven. Being fat, happy, lazy, rude are all personal preferences and decided by choice not when you are born.
 
So people are born destined to be fat. Really? So their choice of diet and lack of excercise had nothing to do with them becoming overweight? Last I checked there were no babies born into obesiety.
 
Your argument is obscure. People are not born into choice. This is what a sexual preference is, choice? This is done once a human is capable of doing so. People choose to be the way they are not that their genetic makeup makes them that way. That's just down right silly.
 
There are no happy genes or one that settles your sexual preference while growing in the woom. Deciding sexual preference is not like deciding whether you are male or female.
 

Allow me to repost.. 

Based upon that argument, if prolonging the existence of the species is our bioligical goal, why are people born with Downs Syndron, MS, Cerebreal Palsy, etc.. Congenital twins, organ deformations, etc?

You don't think that maybe, possibly, there is a similar thing going on with homosexuality?.. 

I had two friends in HS who were clearly happy. One went to church, confessed to the clergy that he was happy and was told to join and stay active in the church, get married, raise a family and he would be "normal", "just a passing phase".  15 years of marriage passed, two kids, ZERO guy ACTS WITHIN THAT TIME, and he finally came out, admitted that he was living a lie. The reaction of all of us who had known him in HS (including most of his immediate family), was an unsurprised, "Gee, really."  

The other friend who was happy also tried to deny it but moved to the Bay area and thrived in the environment, had several relationships but mostly stayed in the closet to his old friends and family.. He ended up commiting suicide.

My point is this... WHY IN THE darn would someone "CHOOSE" to be a social outcast who has to deal with all the hate crimes, ridicule and discrimination that goes along with this "CHOICE"? Martyrdom?

OK I will make an anology here.. 
MODS.. please don't take this the wrong way, as I am not racist and this is for discussion purposes period. 

Say you live in Alabama, So. Carolina, No. Carolina, WV or any one of the former Southern "Slave" States.. If you had a choice, would you choose to be black?
quote
wallstreetcappers send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
wallstreetcappers
Participation Meter
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 47635
Location: United States
#77
Posted: 10/24/2008 1:46:23 PM
Well within the last 60 years there was mistakenly thought that African Americans were genetically inferior to caucasians, so to think that in 50 years we will find genetic proof to show that gays have a genetic disposition isnt far fetched at all.

LINK

We know very little about human genetics, it is HIGHLY likely as we evolve and learn more about genetics that it will be uncovered that genetics determine most behavior and homosexuality will have genetic roots.
quote
ClubDirt send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ClubDirt
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16638
Location: United States
#78
Posted: 10/24/2008 1:55:50 PM
Being fat, happy, lazy, rude are all personal preferences and decided by choice not when you are born.
So people are born destined to be fat. Really? So their choice of diet and lack of excercise had nothing to do with them becoming overweight? Last I checked there were no babies born into obesiety.
 
 
abooksnightmare, are you saying genetics do not play a role in a person's weight?  and your conclusion is based on the fact that babies aren't born obese?  did you learn that in science class or bible study?  is that who i am arguing with?
 
let me also try a little reading comprehension test with you.  you asked me this:  So people are born destined to be fat. Really? So their choice of diet and lack of excercise had nothing to do with them becoming overweight?
 
now, go ahead and read my prior post where i referenced examples of people predisposed to being thin or fat or with high or low cholesterol but alter that outcome with lifestyle choices and tell me if i've already answered the question as to whether lifestyle choices can alter genetic predisposition?
 
 
quote
wasabitobiko send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
wasabitobiko
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1202
Location:
#79
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:06:33 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

Well within the last 60 years there was mistakenly thought that African Americans were genetically inferior to caucasians, so to think that in 50 years we will find genetic proof to show that gays have a genetic disposition isnt far fetched at all.

LINK

We know very little about human genetics, it is HIGHLY likely as we evolve and learn more about genetics that it will be uncovered that genetics determine most behavior and homosexuality will have genetic roots.

  WALL.. why do you always have to be so rational and level headed.. ???!!!



FACT:.. People DEFINATELY have predisposition to Alcoholism, Obesity, Heart Disease, Cancer, Cholesterol and many other diseases.. there are certain things you can't control, like the color of your eyes, color of your hair, skin, etc.

Ask any MD.
quote
ChanceP send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ChanceP
Participation Meter
Banned
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3736
Location: California
#80
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:10:14 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

 
 
Chance-

This thread turned into a discussion about homosexuality in general in many respects.  I get your original point about 2nd graders being taught this sort of subject matter.  I can understand there could be a debate as to when certain subjects should and should not be taught. 

 

quote
ABooksNightmare send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
ABooksNightmare
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19337
Location: California
#81
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:16:20 PM
All I am saying is that you are saying that sexual preference is predetermined by genetics.
 
Simply not true and not proven. That is a fact.
quote
vanzack send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
vanzack
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 49693
Location: Equatorial
              Guinea
#82
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:16:27 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

Van,

If you are well versed in the bible than you also know it has been transcribed so much that it cannot be viewed as perfect, nor should it be considered the only source for moral direction.

Original content is impossible to find, plus anyone quoting the OT should put in perspective that the person were living the old law and that was surpassed when Christ taught, and in many respects the OT is very raw and shouldnt be a guideline for much of anything.

Factually, I know what you say about transcription to be true.  The problem is that Christains love to cherry pick the bible.  Some of it (whatever appeals to them) is gospel law, others, like my quotes above, are written off as the "law of the times".

Something else to think about - the god who supposedly wrote or inspired this bible - shouldnt have the limitations of time.  He is all knowing, all loving, and all powerful.  How does this god write about slavery 4000 years ago as if it is acceptable knowing what he knows is to come?

There is plenty in the new testament too - but also - do you know Jesus NEVER said a thing about homosexuality?

Read the following Bible versus that Jesus spoke about, Im going to source this argument to this link.....  It is very good reading.  After you read them, tell me ONE SINGLE PERSON YOU KNOW that follows this.  And if they are so widely ignored, why is it OK to cherry pick what you choose to believe - even in the New Testament?   The below quotes say "sell everything you have and live your life for the poor and god".  Literally.

Matthew 6:19

    Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal; but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.

Luke 14:33

    Any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be my disciple.

Matthew 6:24

    No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and Money.

Matthew 19:21-24

    Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth. Then Jesus said to his disciples, "I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."

Matthew 19:28-29

    Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.

Luke 9:23-25

    Then he said to them all: "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it. What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, and yet lose or forfeit his very self?

Matt 13: 22

    The one who received the seed that fell among the thorns is the man who hears the word, but the worries of this life and the deceitfulness of wealth choke it, making it unfruitful.

Hebrews 13:5

    Keep your lives free from the love of money and be content with what you have, because God has said, "Never will I leave you; never will I forsake you."

Phil 2:3

    Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility consider others better than yourselves.

Acts 2:44-45

    All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.
quote
wallstreetcappers send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
wallstreetcappers
Participation Meter
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 47635
Location: United States
#83
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:25:25 PM
Van,

I think most blind Christians are going to be shocked when they pass over and realize that they werent "Christians" at all.

Christ's greatest teachings were to not judge and love everyone. It seems that people want to hate each other, judge and hold elitist views. Even if Christ was here now, people wouldnt follow what he taught because it isnt EASY and it takes work, it takes a change of mindset and behavior and most people just want to plop their rumps in the chapel for an hour a week, marginally participate and study and 95% of the time do what they want.

Christ was at the top of this pyramid while most of us cannot get past Level II

LINK
quote
vanzack send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
vanzack
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 49693
Location: Equatorial
              Guinea
#84
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:32:01 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

Van,

I think most blind Christians are going to be shocked when they pass over and realize that they werent "Christians" at all.

Christ's greatest teachings were to not judge and love everyone. It seems that people want to hate each other, judge and hold elitist views. Even if Christ was here now, people wouldnt follow what he taught because it isnt EASY and it takes work, it takes a change of mindset and behavior and most people just want to plop their rumps in the chapel for an hour a week, marginally participate and study and 95% of the time do what they want.

Christ was at the top of this pyramid while most of us cannot get past Level II

LINK

BINGO!!

I always say that Jesus teachings have been hijacked by the people who use them for power.  At their core, Jesus teachings are amazing.  The problem is that todays average Christian is SO far away from what he taught it is incredible.

I find it incredibly ironic that if Jesus were alive today he would revile the republican party that the church so supports today.  He would hate democrats almost as much.  Jesus was a socialist.  I just find it so hipocritical that today christians are so judgemental and support an agenda that goes directly against jesus teachings.

Anyway,  

quote
ABooksNightmare send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
ABooksNightmare
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19337
Location: California
#85
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:33:03 PM
Wall
 
Nobody can follow their religion 100%. It is impossible not to break away from it some how or some way. That's why religion loses so much merit with me.
 
Religion is about faith, dedication and belief, but it is not humanly possibly to be dedicated to all facets of just one type of religion. Since that is the case then what is the church really doing?
 
It's funny how so many let religion control their life, yet they are not able to commit 100% to all of it's beliefs.
 
To each is own.
 
quote
ClubDirt send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ClubDirt
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16638
Location: United States
#86
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:34:02 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:

All I am saying is that you are saying that sexual preference is predetermined by genetics.
 
Simply not true and not proven. That is a fact.

i never said that, although i did, and continue to, say that weight is affected by genetics.  the intersection of genetics, biology, sociology and psychology, to name a few, is extremely complex and does not lend itself to elementary conclusions and weak logic. 

while i never said what you attribute to me, what i do is question the conclusions of people that appear to me to be based on a complete failure of logic, nonsense and/or what apparently was learned in bible study, as opposed to science class.  speaking of which, above you say that the idea that sexual preference is predetermined by genetics is not true and not proven.  first, it certainly may be true, even if unproven.  vanzack can explain what is meant by that.  second no one is saying it is true the way you word it and understand the differences between absolutely determined, strongly affected, partially affected and unaffected to understand what i mean by that. 

quote
wallstreetcappers send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
wallstreetcappers
Participation Meter
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 47635
Location: United States
#87
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:42:25 PM
ABN,

Read what we are saying (Van and I and a few others) I am not saying become a monk and work at the monestary, rather that most people are not following the religion they claim to believe in.

In fact I would wager if I sampled every single denomination and include supposed theologians that most people selectively follow the teachings of the NT and most have no clue as to what they believe or WHY they believe it.

I also completely agree with Van's comment regarding Christ, he was a total socialist. He respected everyone regardless of sex, ethnicity, persuasion.

My comments arent a poke at any religion, but if we want to start poking I can destroy pretty much any religion for fun.



Its fun to debate, I enjoy it and can keep this up for weeks.
quote
vanzack send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
vanzack
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 49693
Location: Equatorial
              Guinea
#88
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:42:50 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

i never said that, although i did, and continue to, say that weight is affected by genetics.  the intersection of genetics, biology, sociology and psychology, to name a few, is extremely complex and does not lend itself to elementary conclusions and weak logic. 

while i never said what you attribute to me, what i do is question the conclusions of people that appear to me to be based on a complete failure of logic, nonsense and/or what apparently was learned in bible study, as opposed to science class.  speaking of which, above you say that the idea that sexual preference is predetermined by genetics is not true and not proven.  first, it certainly may be true, even if unproven.  vanzack can explain what is meant by that.  second no one is saying it is true the way you word it and understand the differences between absolutely determined, strongly affected, partially affected and unaffected to understand what i mean by that. 

There is a TON of evidence pointing to genetics and sexual orientation.  Not surprisingly, people choose not to read it.

Here are some links.  This is mainstream stuff folks.  For all those posting in this thread about the absense of evidence and that sexuality is not genetic, if you sincerely are interested in knowing what you are talking about, do some reading:

LINK 1

LINK 2

LINK 3

quote
vanzack send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
vanzack
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 49693
Location: Equatorial
              Guinea
#89
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:45:14 PM
This is a GREAT summary read from this link.
 
This is the debate above in this thread about genetics and predisposition. 
 
Third, there is a major difference between sexual behavior and sexual motivation. At the simplest level, obviously most of us manage to control sexual urges and find outlets that are consistent with cultural or personal moral beliefs. On the other hand, the targets of our sexual desires is an entirely different matter. Sexual desire varies a good deal. Some people report they are exclusively attracted to members of the opposite sex (and we generally call such people heterosexual or straight), others are attracted exclusively to members of their own sex (guy) and others are attracted to both sexes (bisexuals) to varying degrees. These are not, however, three distinct points along some continuum. While some people may be exclusively attracted to one gender or the other, many others report having varying degrees of attraction to the other gender. Such preferences map imperfectly onto actual behavior. Thus many happy men and lesbians are or have been in heterosexual relationships, and sometimes men and women who think of themselves as exclusively heterosexual can engage in guy behavior (prisons are one, but not the only, example). It is also possible for people to have one sort of relationship at one point in their lives and another at a later or earlier point. It is therefore important to note that the genetics argument is largely about whether people are attracted to members of their own sex, the other sex, or both and not about what kinds of behavior they exhibit.
quote
ABooksNightmare send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
ABooksNightmare
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19337
Location: California
#90
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:46:25 PM
Club relax.....In my original post it wasn't dedicated to you. At the beginning of this thread it was mentioned that people are born happy. There is no arguing this point.
 
Whether this is proven or not at some later date is yet to be determined.  I am speaking now. It is not correct to state that your point or those in this thread is true.
 
It has not YET been determined scientifically that people are born happy. Why even argue this? Until it is proven then people are not genetically born happy you have no case against what I stated. This was my only point. 
quote
ABooksNightmare send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
ABooksNightmare
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19337
Location: California
#91
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:48:54 PM
Wall
 
I thought I was agreeing with you......
 
 
Just stating my take on what you said
 
 "I think most blind Christians are going to be shocked when they pass over and realize that they werent "Christians" at all.
quote
vanzack send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
vanzack
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 49693
Location: Equatorial
              Guinea
#92
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:50:18 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:

Club relax.....In my original post it wasn't dedicated to you. At the beginning of this thread it was mentioned that people are born happy. There is no arguing this point.
 
Whether this is proven or not at some later date is yet to be determined.  I am speaking now. It is not correct to state that your point or those in this thread is true.
 
It has not YET been determined scientifically that people are born happy. Why even argue this? Until it is proven then people are not genetically born happy you have no case against what I stated. This was my only point. 

ABN - I respectfully ask - no make that beg - you to click on my links above, or do some REAL SCIENTIFIC reading in to the subject.

You will be very surprised that the scientific community strongly disagrees with your "factual" statements.

quote
snuke
RSI Wagerline RSI Rating
send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Sports Interaction |
snuke
Participation Meter
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1075
Location: United States
#93
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:52:25 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by vanzack:

This one is particularly funny - keep in mind - this is from the book written by god - the good book:
 
 


You, sir, are obviously a liar when you posted above that you are well schooled in bible studies.  Sorry, no one here is buying that.  Anyone who has studied the bible knows that it wasn't "written by God".  I've taken more than enough courses in my life on the bible.  In fact, I took a course on the Old Testament and can tell you are full of total garbage.

In nearly every thread where a debate breaks out, you pull in biblical quotes to prove some ridiculous point.  The only thing that proves is that you have a hate-on for religion and people that believe in a religion.  That's fine.  You have that right, of course.  But continue smearing like this and no one will take you seriously.  I find it funny how you ridicule people for not having tolerance for gays and yet you obviously have no tolerance for other people's beliefs.
quote
vanzack send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
vanzack
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 49693
Location: Equatorial
              Guinea
#94
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:53:09 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:

Club relax.....In my original post it wasn't dedicated to you. At the beginning of this thread it was mentioned that people are born happy. There is no arguing this point.
 
Whether this is proven or not at some later date is yet to be determined.  I am speaking now. It is not correct to state that your point or those in this thread is true.
 
It has not YET been determined scientifically that people are born happy. Why even argue this? Until it is proven then people are not genetically born happy you have no case against what I stated. This was my only point. 

People knew the world was round before they had proof.

People knew there were germs before there was proof.

People knew there was DNA before the genome was mapped.

Scientists know that sexuality is predisposed genetically, the proof is coming.

Your argument that it is not yet "proven" does not mean it has not yet been "scientifically determined", as you use both terms in the same sentence above.

quote
wallstreetcappers send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
wallstreetcappers
Participation Meter
Covers Linesmen
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 47635
Location: United States
#95
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:53:39 PM
ABN,

I thought you were inferring that I was saying people must devote a high percentage of their life to religion.



Good comment regarding sexuality Van..right on the . Realistically we know ZIPPO about genetics or what makes us think as we do in most every area, we will probably destroy each other before we fully understand ourselves.
quote
ABooksNightmare send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
ABooksNightmare
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19337
Location: California
#96
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:55:43 PM
Link 1
 

It said many of the genetic studies were too small to draw definite conclusions from.

Alan Wardle from the happy rights charity Stonewall said: "This is an interesting debate and there may well be a genetic element, but it's not conclusive.

 

Link 2

No matter how people feel about the issue, it is increasingly hard to argue that genes play no role in homosexuality. The evidence began to pile up in 1991, when studies showed that identical twins were more likely to have the same sexual orientation than other pairs of siblings. That same year, a California scientist reported slight brain differences between happy and straight men, although the conclusion is disputed. And in 1993, an NIH researcher found a stretch of DNA on the X chromosome that seemed to harbor one or more genes affecting sexual orientation. But no one has proved that a particular gene promotes gayness or has offered any convincing theory of how genes could influence a person's choice of sleeping partners.

 

 

Too many links on link 3. Not proven. There are suggestions that point to it, but nothing definitive. That's my point exactly. Until it is proven as such then we can not assume that people are born happy.

quote
vanzack send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports |
vanzack
Participation Meter
Legend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 49693
Location: Equatorial
              Guinea
#97
Posted: 10/24/2008 2:57:41 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by snuke:



You, sir, are obviously a liar when you posted above that you are well schooled in bible studies.  Sorry, no one here is buying that.  Anyone who has studied the bible knows that it wasn't "written by God".  I've taken more than enough courses in my life on the bible.  In fact, I took a course on the Old Testament and can tell you are full of total garbage.

In nearly every thread where a debate breaks out, you pull in biblical quotes to prove some ridiculous point.  The only thing that proves is that you have a hate-on for religion and people that believe in a religion.  That's fine.  You have that right, of course.  But continue smearing like this and no one will take you seriously.  I find it funny how you ridicule people for not having tolerance for gays and yet you obviously have no tolerance for other people's beliefs.

The bible is believed to be the inspired word of god.  I guess it depends on who you ask, but saying that god wrote the bible is usually not offensive to those who believe it.  But once again, it is OK for you to cherry pick the bible for the verses that fit your agenda.

I have no tolerance for ignorance.  I have no tolerance for a society that is held back because of that ignorance.  I have no tolerance for people that support human suffering in favor of their superstitions.  I have no tolerance for blind faith instead of evidenciary rational thinking.  I have no tolerance for people who would like to see things deteriorate on earth to speed up their process of getting to heaven. 

If the shoe fits.....

quote
ABooksNightmare send a private message View Space | Friends | Playbook |
ABooksNightmare
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19337
Location: California
#98
Posted: 10/24/2008 3:00:59 PM
Van
 
Your points are valid, but those have all now been scientificaly determined to be true.
 
 
As I stated, it may be determined one day that the genetics are there, but with today's technology wouldn't that have already been done succesfully?
 
To state that because it has not been proven it is would be far fetched given the science we have today. Back in the day it was different to assume something because the technology wasn't there.
 
To blindly make a statement that people are born happy without scientific proof in today's world would not make sense. Back in the '60's would be a different story.
 
 
quote
ClubDirt send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ClubDirt
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16638
Location: United States
#99
Posted: 10/24/2008 3:04:12 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by vanzack:

There is a TON of evidence pointing to genetics and sexual orientation.  Not surprisingly, people choose not to read it.

Here are some links.  This is mainstream stuff folks.  For all those posting in this thread about the absense of evidence and that sexuality is not genetic, if you sincerely are interested in knowing what you are talking about, do some reading:

LINK 1

LINK 2

LINK 3

vanzack, i agree with you and your conclusion.  i'm just not as familiar with the articles and the science as you and hesitate to give an opinion as to the genetic aspects of sexual orientation.  although if other people appreciated this part of your post: These are not, however, three distinct points along some continuum., i think the conversation would go a lot more smoothly.  you can't think in black and white when discussing genetics, characteristics, traits, sociaology, etc. 

ABN, as to your opinion and my opinion of what we think is now true and will later be proven regarding the factors that determine or affect sexual orientation, i respect yours and appreciate that mine is just that, an opinion.

quote
ClubDirt send a private message View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
ClubDirt
Participation Meter
MVP
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16638
Location: United States
#100
Posted: 10/24/2008 3:12:07 PM

so snuke, when so many of the hardcore religious base their prejudices against gays on the bible, what is wrong with vanzack quoting other parts of the bible these same people choose to ignore to point out their hyposcrisy and the idea that these people aren't necessarily basing their beliefs on the bible but in fact are justifying their prejudices (and insecurities, fears and ignorance) with particular passages from the bible that fit?  is that what jesus intended?

why shouldn't happy people be allowed to marry?

quote
Forum Index : Penalty Box : Messages Page 4 of 5  1 2 3 4 5  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.