HappyKane .... how confident are you on those two Under plays ?
Very confident. A heavy dose of Hugh Charles will keep Colorado in this game for all 4 quarters. Graham Harrell and Crabtree aren't going to be lights out as people would expect. Same thought with the Georgia/Florida match-up. I'm expecting both offense to be average for most of the game. Tebow, Percy Harvin, Caldwell, Kestahn Moore, and Cornelius Ingram's performance should be in the B-/C+ range. Same grades for Geogia's QB and RB and a few receivers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by momoney:
HappyKane .... how confident are you on those two Under plays ?
Very confident. A heavy dose of Hugh Charles will keep Colorado in this game for all 4 quarters. Graham Harrell and Crabtree aren't going to be lights out as people would expect. Same thought with the Georgia/Florida match-up. I'm expecting both offense to be average for most of the game. Tebow, Percy Harvin, Caldwell, Kestahn Moore, and Cornelius Ingram's performance should be in the B-/C+ range. Same grades for Geogia's QB and RB and a few receivers.
Hey Haps! Any leans on Louisville, Northwestern, South Carolina, and Akron? GL today!
I'm not betting the game but i like Northwestern and the points. Wildcats just need one more win to be bowl eligible and they can do it this week even though it'll be tough. Tyrell Sutton made a rare and brief showing last week versus Eastern Michigan. That was a sign that he's ready for the Purdue game and he could be the x-factor for Northwestern. Both C.J. and Painter should have a decent game, so i'm expecting a high scoring affair. What's keeping me from betting the Wildcats is their cheesy defense and the corners' propensity to give up big plays down-field. Painter will spread the Wildcat's defense and be successful. Purdue will win, but not by 14 points.
Not a strong prognosis, so i'll lay off the game and just observe.
0
Quote Originally Posted by topdawg999:
Hey Haps! Any leans on Louisville, Northwestern, South Carolina, and Akron? GL today!
I'm not betting the game but i like Northwestern and the points. Wildcats just need one more win to be bowl eligible and they can do it this week even though it'll be tough. Tyrell Sutton made a rare and brief showing last week versus Eastern Michigan. That was a sign that he's ready for the Purdue game and he could be the x-factor for Northwestern. Both C.J. and Painter should have a decent game, so i'm expecting a high scoring affair. What's keeping me from betting the Wildcats is their cheesy defense and the corners' propensity to give up big plays down-field. Painter will spread the Wildcat's defense and be successful. Purdue will win, but not by 14 points.
Not a strong prognosis, so i'll lay off the game and just observe.
do you use your ratings system for all of your plays or just the one's you post.
Thanx
Indiobear
gltu
I run charts for all of the games. The ones i post here are the strongest plays. Its very time consuming going through the charts for 20-30 starters on the depth chart [for each team] and if i don't post the players ratings for a certain game, it just means that i didn't have time to transcribe them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by indiobear:
do you use your ratings system for all of your plays or just the one's you post.
Thanx
Indiobear
gltu
I run charts for all of the games. The ones i post here are the strongest plays. Its very time consuming going through the charts for 20-30 starters on the depth chart [for each team] and if i don't post the players ratings for a certain game, it just means that i didn't have time to transcribe them.
dropitlikeithot - Can't stay in the 70s, bro. The law of averages will catch up. But i do hope to stay above 60% for the remainder of the season and hope to hit over 70% for the Bowl games.
0
dropitlikeithot - Can't stay in the 70s, bro. The law of averages will catch up. But i do hope to stay above 60% for the remainder of the season and hope to hit over 70% for the Bowl games.
Quick question HK....you had rutgers +6 and +195,and you said they would win outright,thus the wager of ML +195.I have seen you count this as 2 wins before when a dog won outright,but you counted this as 1 loss.Did you have a seperate wager on rutgers ML as well as +6,or did you just have the +6 and thought they would win outright? I know a few cappers who will think a dog will win outright,so they put 75% on the points and 25% on the ML,but a cover without a win still cuts into the profit margin.Thanks.
0
Quick question HK....you had rutgers +6 and +195,and you said they would win outright,thus the wager of ML +195.I have seen you count this as 2 wins before when a dog won outright,but you counted this as 1 loss.Did you have a seperate wager on rutgers ML as well as +6,or did you just have the +6 and thought they would win outright? I know a few cappers who will think a dog will win outright,so they put 75% on the points and 25% on the ML,but a cover without a win still cuts into the profit margin.Thanks.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.