Nice Packers...they should be Okay...not enough of em took HGH in high school though!
HGH and steroid use is a huge factor in the NCAAF today. (in my opinion)I would put each school in a category of Compliant (tests are given regularly with appropriate punishment and “reluctantly complinant” (rarely test; players know when tests are and how to cheat (use someone elses pee, whizzinator, stop for the month prior to the tests…HGH has no urine analysis test…it is only seen by using a blood sample (which are not used). Also “Hitting a cycle” or two right after the season is probably standard for almost ALL players.
What teams players used HGH or Roids or both …my estimates would be:
LSU (35-40%)
Alabama (35-40%)
Ohio St. (35-40%)
Oregon (30-35%)
Texas (20-25%)
Texas A&M (20-25%)
OKST (25-30%)
USC (15-20%)
UGA (15-20%)
Florida (20-25%)
FSU (15-20%)
Wisconsin (15-20%)
KSU (5-10%)
Clemson (20-25%)
Arkansas (25-30%)
I suspect they use HGH in high school and in their first red- shirted year and “Hit cycles at the appropriate times, right after the season and when tests aren’t close-by.
There is no test for HGH right now! It’s only detectable with a blood test which they don’t do!
Give a blood sample (or hair follicle test = even better) or stop testing!!
Nice Packers...they should be Okay...not enough of em took HGH in high school though!
HGH and steroid use is a huge factor in the NCAAF today. (in my opinion)I would put each school in a category of Compliant (tests are given regularly with appropriate punishment and “reluctantly complinant” (rarely test; players know when tests are and how to cheat (use someone elses pee, whizzinator, stop for the month prior to the tests…HGH has no urine analysis test…it is only seen by using a blood sample (which are not used). Also “Hitting a cycle” or two right after the season is probably standard for almost ALL players.
What teams players used HGH or Roids or both …my estimates would be:
LSU (35-40%)
Alabama (35-40%)
Ohio St. (35-40%)
Oregon (30-35%)
Texas (20-25%)
Texas A&M (20-25%)
OKST (25-30%)
USC (15-20%)
UGA (15-20%)
Florida (20-25%)
FSU (15-20%)
Wisconsin (15-20%)
KSU (5-10%)
Clemson (20-25%)
Arkansas (25-30%)
I suspect they use HGH in high school and in their first red- shirted year and “Hit cycles at the appropriate times, right after the season and when tests aren’t close-by.
There is no test for HGH right now! It’s only detectable with a blood test which they don’t do!
Give a blood sample (or hair follicle test = even better) or stop testing!!
I'm involved with lots of athletes and can say that almost no high school or college athletes use HGH- juice yes- Lots of steroids are cheap but good HGH is very expensive-
I'm involved with lots of athletes and can say that almost no high school or college athletes use HGH- juice yes- Lots of steroids are cheap but good HGH is very expensive-
Yeah steroids taken at the right time, or just cheating the test (use someone elses pee, whizzinator, a pill, a drink) Its not tested for, and wont be for another 5 years or so, I would take it if I was in college or high school!!
Yeah steroids taken at the right time, or just cheating the test (use someone elses pee, whizzinator, a pill, a drink) Its not tested for, and wont be for another 5 years or so, I would take it if I was in college or high school!!
Nice Packers...they should be Okay...not enough of em took HGH in high school though!
HGH and steroid use is a huge factor in the NCAAF today. (in my opinion)I would put each school in a category of Compliant (tests are given regularly with appropriate punishment and “reluctantly complinant” (rarely test; players know when tests are and how to cheat (use someone elses pee, whizzinator, stop for the month prior to the tests…HGH has no urine analysis test…it is only seen by using a blood sample (which are not used). Also “Hitting a cycle” or two right after the season is probably standard for almost ALL players.
What teams players used HGH or Roids or both …my estimates would be:
LSU (35-40%)
Alabama (35-40%)
Ohio St. (35-40%)
Oregon (30-35%)
Texas (20-25%)
Texas A&M (20-25%)
OKST (25-30%)
USC (15-20%)
UGA (15-20%)
Florida (20-25%)
FSU (15-20%)
Wisconsin (15-20%)
KSU (5-10%)
Clemson (20-25%)
Arkansas (25-30%)
I suspect they use HGH in high school and in their first red- shirted year and “Hit cycles at the appropriate times, right after the season and when tests aren’t close-by.
There is no test for HGH right now! It’s only detectable with a blood test which they don’t do!
Give a blood sample (or hair follicle test = even better) or stop testing!!
respect your work Bro - but why the estimates - any formula for the numbers ? Wtf - and why
Nice Packers...they should be Okay...not enough of em took HGH in high school though!
HGH and steroid use is a huge factor in the NCAAF today. (in my opinion)I would put each school in a category of Compliant (tests are given regularly with appropriate punishment and “reluctantly complinant” (rarely test; players know when tests are and how to cheat (use someone elses pee, whizzinator, stop for the month prior to the tests…HGH has no urine analysis test…it is only seen by using a blood sample (which are not used). Also “Hitting a cycle” or two right after the season is probably standard for almost ALL players.
What teams players used HGH or Roids or both …my estimates would be:
LSU (35-40%)
Alabama (35-40%)
Ohio St. (35-40%)
Oregon (30-35%)
Texas (20-25%)
Texas A&M (20-25%)
OKST (25-30%)
USC (15-20%)
UGA (15-20%)
Florida (20-25%)
FSU (15-20%)
Wisconsin (15-20%)
KSU (5-10%)
Clemson (20-25%)
Arkansas (25-30%)
I suspect they use HGH in high school and in their first red- shirted year and “Hit cycles at the appropriate times, right after the season and when tests aren’t close-by.
There is no test for HGH right now! It’s only detectable with a blood test which they don’t do!
Give a blood sample (or hair follicle test = even better) or stop testing!!
respect your work Bro - but why the estimates - any formula for the numbers ? Wtf - and why
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.