... But first a note: I've had a very successful run in bowl season for
the past several years. Means little to you, I know. And you may not
even believe it. Don't care. Bowl season used to be an obliteration for
me. I spent my teens and 20s buried with the book before the Jan. 1
games ever arrived. Fortunately, I learned from my mistakes and got a
good grasp on how a typical bowl season flows. For me, cashing a bowl
ticket is better than cashing a regular-season ticket, even if it's for
less money. I know that's not how "pros" think, but I don't give a fuck
what or how "pros" think. I bet for extra income and personal enjoyment.
I get my rocks off my own way. I enjoy bowl season as my favorite time
of year and I enjoy saying "I cashed a ticket on the Sugar Bowl" almost
as much as I enjoy the money. That's just how it is. Anyway, this bowl
season sucks. There are opportunities out there, however. But overall,
it sucks and the usual things that make a bowl season flow are just not
there. You can thank Ohio St. and Penn St. not being bowl eligible for
this. It caused a trickle-down effect that ruined just about everything.
Nonetheless, we move forward ...
San Diego St. +2 1/2 (Poinsettia Bowl) -- Not the match up we were
hoping for with San Diego St. We wanted both the Aztecs, and similar
story San Jose St., to be playing unmotivated and unsuspecting PAC-12
teams. Instead, we get SDSU going against one of the most emotionally
mature teams out there in BYU. And whatever home-field edge there may
have been is blunted by the fact that BYU fans travel well because they
have nothing better to do in life. Still, though, we feel there is
reasonable room to find a bet getting the Aztecs taking a full 3 points
in a game that if somehow BYU wins will be close. San Diego St. brings
by far the better resume to this setting. Not only that, the Aztecs are a
more complete football team, meaning they have both a solid offense AND
defense. There are common opponents on the docket to work with. BYU
went to Boise and managed just 6 points in a 7-6 loss. San Diego St.
left Boise with a 21-19 win. Big deal, you say? Well when you consider
that BYU had a +5 turnover edge vs. Boise and San Diego St.'s turnover
edge was even, then you start to see why that game matters and why it
shows an ongoing problem for the Cougars the entire season -- they
couldn't move the ball consistently on good defenses. A good defense is
what San Diego St. will bring to this setting and the Aztecs are the
more trustworthy side on offense. Getting 3 (you should still be able to
even with some extra juice) with the better team is a must take. We
don't think this will be a blowout either way, but San Diego St. should
be favored and not dogged. A solid play.
Washington +5 (Las Vegas Bowl) -- We love that the Boise St. name still
carries weight both at the windows and in terms of getting the opponent
excited. But the facts are that the Broncos were nothing much this
season. In every step-up game or important game, they were a bit of
disappointment and it has everything to do with offense. The QB play was
just not there this season. And when that wasn't good enough, there was
no running game to salvage things. In fact, this is an extremely weak
team across ALL the skill spots ... and that only makes sense when you
see former players like Kellen Moore, Doug Martin, Austin Pettis, Titus
Young on NFL rosters. The defense was still good enough to keep the team
in games, although when we look at exactly the caliber of offensive
team that the Broncos faced this team, we're not impressed with much
other than San Diego St., which ended up beating Boise. The Broncos held
down Michigan St., BYU, Fresno St., and to a degree Nevada, but none of
those teams were what we'd consider better-than-average offensively
this season. So, what we may have here is a Boise team that comes in
believing it's a defensive team partly because of results and partly
because the offense sucks. But not even that may be true once they face a
team with real offensive skill talent. They'll get that here against
Washington, which sports a solid QB in Price, an excellent RB in Bishop
Sankey and several talented WRs who don't always live up to their
physical tools with their play on the field, but you just have to close
your eyes and hope they do tonight. Washington made great strides this
season defensively. Yes, the Huskies had games in which they were
filleted, but overall this was a better defense than last year's
hopeless unit. When comparing resumes, Washington had by far the better
wins (Stanford, Oregon St.) and the better overall SOS (seven bowls
teams to Boise's six, but Washington faced two BCS bowls teams and LSU).
Both teams figure to have plenty of motivation, so we don't expect
either team to be flat. But we do expect the Huskies to be better and
capable of more things. Boise's offense won't be a tough task for the UW
defense. Washington's offense has arguably the best overall skill
talent that Boise faced this season. Wrong team is favored here and
getting this many points in a game that the Huskies should control is
very, very generous. Lite snack on the money line suggested.
UCLA PK (Holiday Bowl) -- We'll put it to you like this, it took one of
the greatest offenses we may ever see playing indoors and on carpet to
get Baylor home against Washington in last year's Alamo Bowl. The record
will show the Bears covered the game, but we all know it was somewhat
lucky and that they trailed by 18 points in the second half. Why does
any of that matter? Well, we think it shows just how bad Baylor is on
defense ... that the Bears needed an all-time performance from an
all-time offense on a preferred surface/dome in their home state to get a
bowl win that was very hard fought and in doubt until way late. Fast
forward to this season. The Bears are still very good on offense, but
not as good. The Bears are just as bad on defense. And now they have a
bowl game outdoors, on grass, in the opponent's home state and against a
team that can do one thing ESPECIALLY WELL on offense -- RUSH THE
PASSER. UCLA is absolutely one of the best bets of bowl season. When we
review resumes, we see a UCLA team that has been on the field with some
excellent offenses capable of doing many things with many great players.
Baylor is nothing special compared to what UCLA in USC's QB/WRs,
Stanford's RB/OL, Arizona's QB/SCHEME. We won't even mention Nebraska,
Oregon St. and Arizona St. The Bruins bring the far better resume, far
better defense, far better running game to this game. Baylor brings one
thing, an outstanding offense. But that kind of offense with these types
of skill players are really nothing that UCLA hasn't already seen this
season. There will be no culture shock. Meanwhile, UCLA's own offense
figures to have a field day with Baylor's defense. QB Hundley isn't ever
mentioned in the same convo as other frosh QBs like Golson, Manziel and
Mariota, but he's not far off. The Bruins have one of the nation's top
RBs in Franklin. There is a slight concern about motivation, but we
think that Jim Mora isn't the kind of coach to let his team be flat for a
bowl game. As game day draws near, the idea of having the entire
national stage to themselves in a night game on ESPN will become quite
appealing for the UCLA players. This is our biggest bet of bowl season.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
College: 7-4 +2.60 units
NFL: 4-2-1 +1.80 units
... But first a note: I've had a very successful run in bowl season for
the past several years. Means little to you, I know. And you may not
even believe it. Don't care. Bowl season used to be an obliteration for
me. I spent my teens and 20s buried with the book before the Jan. 1
games ever arrived. Fortunately, I learned from my mistakes and got a
good grasp on how a typical bowl season flows. For me, cashing a bowl
ticket is better than cashing a regular-season ticket, even if it's for
less money. I know that's not how "pros" think, but I don't give a fuck
what or how "pros" think. I bet for extra income and personal enjoyment.
I get my rocks off my own way. I enjoy bowl season as my favorite time
of year and I enjoy saying "I cashed a ticket on the Sugar Bowl" almost
as much as I enjoy the money. That's just how it is. Anyway, this bowl
season sucks. There are opportunities out there, however. But overall,
it sucks and the usual things that make a bowl season flow are just not
there. You can thank Ohio St. and Penn St. not being bowl eligible for
this. It caused a trickle-down effect that ruined just about everything.
Nonetheless, we move forward ...
San Diego St. +2 1/2 (Poinsettia Bowl) -- Not the match up we were
hoping for with San Diego St. We wanted both the Aztecs, and similar
story San Jose St., to be playing unmotivated and unsuspecting PAC-12
teams. Instead, we get SDSU going against one of the most emotionally
mature teams out there in BYU. And whatever home-field edge there may
have been is blunted by the fact that BYU fans travel well because they
have nothing better to do in life. Still, though, we feel there is
reasonable room to find a bet getting the Aztecs taking a full 3 points
in a game that if somehow BYU wins will be close. San Diego St. brings
by far the better resume to this setting. Not only that, the Aztecs are a
more complete football team, meaning they have both a solid offense AND
defense. There are common opponents on the docket to work with. BYU
went to Boise and managed just 6 points in a 7-6 loss. San Diego St.
left Boise with a 21-19 win. Big deal, you say? Well when you consider
that BYU had a +5 turnover edge vs. Boise and San Diego St.'s turnover
edge was even, then you start to see why that game matters and why it
shows an ongoing problem for the Cougars the entire season -- they
couldn't move the ball consistently on good defenses. A good defense is
what San Diego St. will bring to this setting and the Aztecs are the
more trustworthy side on offense. Getting 3 (you should still be able to
even with some extra juice) with the better team is a must take. We
don't think this will be a blowout either way, but San Diego St. should
be favored and not dogged. A solid play.
Washington +5 (Las Vegas Bowl) -- We love that the Boise St. name still
carries weight both at the windows and in terms of getting the opponent
excited. But the facts are that the Broncos were nothing much this
season. In every step-up game or important game, they were a bit of
disappointment and it has everything to do with offense. The QB play was
just not there this season. And when that wasn't good enough, there was
no running game to salvage things. In fact, this is an extremely weak
team across ALL the skill spots ... and that only makes sense when you
see former players like Kellen Moore, Doug Martin, Austin Pettis, Titus
Young on NFL rosters. The defense was still good enough to keep the team
in games, although when we look at exactly the caliber of offensive
team that the Broncos faced this team, we're not impressed with much
other than San Diego St., which ended up beating Boise. The Broncos held
down Michigan St., BYU, Fresno St., and to a degree Nevada, but none of
those teams were what we'd consider better-than-average offensively
this season. So, what we may have here is a Boise team that comes in
believing it's a defensive team partly because of results and partly
because the offense sucks. But not even that may be true once they face a
team with real offensive skill talent. They'll get that here against
Washington, which sports a solid QB in Price, an excellent RB in Bishop
Sankey and several talented WRs who don't always live up to their
physical tools with their play on the field, but you just have to close
your eyes and hope they do tonight. Washington made great strides this
season defensively. Yes, the Huskies had games in which they were
filleted, but overall this was a better defense than last year's
hopeless unit. When comparing resumes, Washington had by far the better
wins (Stanford, Oregon St.) and the better overall SOS (seven bowls
teams to Boise's six, but Washington faced two BCS bowls teams and LSU).
Both teams figure to have plenty of motivation, so we don't expect
either team to be flat. But we do expect the Huskies to be better and
capable of more things. Boise's offense won't be a tough task for the UW
defense. Washington's offense has arguably the best overall skill
talent that Boise faced this season. Wrong team is favored here and
getting this many points in a game that the Huskies should control is
very, very generous. Lite snack on the money line suggested.
UCLA PK (Holiday Bowl) -- We'll put it to you like this, it took one of
the greatest offenses we may ever see playing indoors and on carpet to
get Baylor home against Washington in last year's Alamo Bowl. The record
will show the Bears covered the game, but we all know it was somewhat
lucky and that they trailed by 18 points in the second half. Why does
any of that matter? Well, we think it shows just how bad Baylor is on
defense ... that the Bears needed an all-time performance from an
all-time offense on a preferred surface/dome in their home state to get a
bowl win that was very hard fought and in doubt until way late. Fast
forward to this season. The Bears are still very good on offense, but
not as good. The Bears are just as bad on defense. And now they have a
bowl game outdoors, on grass, in the opponent's home state and against a
team that can do one thing ESPECIALLY WELL on offense -- RUSH THE
PASSER. UCLA is absolutely one of the best bets of bowl season. When we
review resumes, we see a UCLA team that has been on the field with some
excellent offenses capable of doing many things with many great players.
Baylor is nothing special compared to what UCLA in USC's QB/WRs,
Stanford's RB/OL, Arizona's QB/SCHEME. We won't even mention Nebraska,
Oregon St. and Arizona St. The Bruins bring the far better resume, far
better defense, far better running game to this game. Baylor brings one
thing, an outstanding offense. But that kind of offense with these types
of skill players are really nothing that UCLA hasn't already seen this
season. There will be no culture shock. Meanwhile, UCLA's own offense
figures to have a field day with Baylor's defense. QB Hundley isn't ever
mentioned in the same convo as other frosh QBs like Golson, Manziel and
Mariota, but he's not far off. The Bruins have one of the nation's top
RBs in Franklin. There is a slight concern about motivation, but we
think that Jim Mora isn't the kind of coach to let his team be flat for a
bowl game. As game day draws near, the idea of having the entire
national stage to themselves in a night game on ESPN will become quite
appealing for the UCLA players. This is our biggest bet of bowl season.
Nice stuff-I got my own thread and some similar plays.. can't wait for the N.II FSU game...you can probably get even better odds from your friends on that one..
Ucla-I live here and Ucla will definitely be up for this one-best bowl they've played in for years...and they do have a better D and should win...but one thing about Hundley-dude stairs down his receivers like crazy or they would've beaten Stanford...hopefully Baylor's secondary is too busy trying to stop him and franklin from running...
Like the Aztecs too-big win up on the blue carpet...
0
Nice stuff-I got my own thread and some similar plays.. can't wait for the N.II FSU game...you can probably get even better odds from your friends on that one..
Ucla-I live here and Ucla will definitely be up for this one-best bowl they've played in for years...and they do have a better D and should win...but one thing about Hundley-dude stairs down his receivers like crazy or they would've beaten Stanford...hopefully Baylor's secondary is too busy trying to stop him and franklin from running...
Like the Aztecs too-big win up on the blue carpet...
Write ups are solid, little nit pick is stating Fresno St. offense isn't above average. I have them rated slightly above average for most of the season and even higher once their top WR came into form. Like the plays and logic nevertheless. GL to you and your team.
0
Write ups are solid, little nit pick is stating Fresno St. offense isn't above average. I have them rated slightly above average for most of the season and even higher once their top WR came into form. Like the plays and logic nevertheless. GL to you and your team.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.