first off, its Simmonds.
second, you lose credibility yourself because you are obviously bias being a rangers fan and are salty mcd is missing time
third, he cross checked Simmonds in the head because he was getting run at? i dont buy it, but even if it is true, your 'sucker punch' mention makes no sense. If he knew he was gettin run at and then got his stick up, was he not ready for reprecussion? do you know what sucker punch means? if you cross check someone in the fuckin head, you should be ready to get punched in the face. he just got caught with his mouth open so he got concussed.
first off, its Simmonds.
second, you lose credibility yourself because you are obviously bias being a rangers fan and are salty mcd is missing time
third, he cross checked Simmonds in the head because he was getting run at? i dont buy it, but even if it is true, your 'sucker punch' mention makes no sense. If he knew he was gettin run at and then got his stick up, was he not ready for reprecussion? do you know what sucker punch means? if you cross check someone in the fuckin head, you should be ready to get punched in the face. he just got caught with his mouth open so he got concussed.
first off, its Simmonds.
second, you lose credibility yourself because you are obviously bias being a rangers fan and are salty mcd is missing time
third, he cross checked Simmonds in the head because he was getting run at? i dont buy it, but even if it is true, your 'sucker punch' mention makes no sense. If he knew he was gettin run at and then got his stick up, was he not ready for reprecussion? do you know what sucker punch means? if you cross check someone in the fuckin head, you should be ready to get punched in the face. he just got caught with his mouth open so he got concussed.
first off, its Simmonds.
second, you lose credibility yourself because you are obviously bias being a rangers fan and are salty mcd is missing time
third, he cross checked Simmonds in the head because he was getting run at? i dont buy it, but even if it is true, your 'sucker punch' mention makes no sense. If he knew he was gettin run at and then got his stick up, was he not ready for reprecussion? do you know what sucker punch means? if you cross check someone in the fuckin head, you should be ready to get punched in the face. he just got caught with his mouth open so he got concussed.
good points, probably could have still got it across without the easy, tired rip on philly fans though.
good points, probably could have still got it across without the easy, tired rip on philly fans though.
first off, its Simmonds.
My bad. I actually knew that, not sure why I made the error.
second, you lose credibility yourself because you are obviously bias being a rangers fan and are salty mcd is missing time
Once again, my bad. I should have made the point that I am a Ranger fan for 45 years, and duly biased. Although, I believe myself to be as objective as any fan is capable of being, for what that's worth.
third, he cross checked Simmonds in the head because he was getting run at? i dont buy it, but even if it is true, your 'sucker punch' mention makes no sense.
Watch the video. Simmonds is clearly running McDonagh with the puck nowhere in the vicinity. As for it being a sucker punch, outside of Philly I have yet to see it described as anything but that. Big of Simmonds to tag a player with a grand total of 2 fights on his resume.
If he knew he was gettin run at and then got his stick up, was he not ready for reprecussion? do you know what sucker punch means? if you cross check someone in the fuckin head, you should be ready to get punched in the face. he just got caught with his mouth open so he got concussed.
First of all, it's "repercussion".
If you knew the history of Simmonds/McDonagh, which I'm assuming you don't, the reason the goon went after McD is simply because McDonagh regularly draws the assignment against Simmonds line, and regularly renders him useless. It was Simmonds aggravation with being outplayed that caused him to first run at, and then throw a punch at a player who doesn't fight.
first off, its Simmonds.
My bad. I actually knew that, not sure why I made the error.
second, you lose credibility yourself because you are obviously bias being a rangers fan and are salty mcd is missing time
Once again, my bad. I should have made the point that I am a Ranger fan for 45 years, and duly biased. Although, I believe myself to be as objective as any fan is capable of being, for what that's worth.
third, he cross checked Simmonds in the head because he was getting run at? i dont buy it, but even if it is true, your 'sucker punch' mention makes no sense.
Watch the video. Simmonds is clearly running McDonagh with the puck nowhere in the vicinity. As for it being a sucker punch, outside of Philly I have yet to see it described as anything but that. Big of Simmonds to tag a player with a grand total of 2 fights on his resume.
If he knew he was gettin run at and then got his stick up, was he not ready for reprecussion? do you know what sucker punch means? if you cross check someone in the fuckin head, you should be ready to get punched in the face. he just got caught with his mouth open so he got concussed.
First of all, it's "repercussion".
If you knew the history of Simmonds/McDonagh, which I'm assuming you don't, the reason the goon went after McD is simply because McDonagh regularly draws the assignment against Simmonds line, and regularly renders him useless. It was Simmonds aggravation with being outplayed that caused him to first run at, and then throw a punch at a player who doesn't fight.
you win the spelling bee. enjoy the game, dont think you will need mcdonaugh tonight anyway
you win the spelling bee. enjoy the game, dont think you will need mcdonaugh tonight anyway
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.