It's a movie yes...but it has the truth in it... patterns are prevalent in the universe. You should know this. You ever experience synchronicty?
Well anyway, thanks for your comment.
But Rose was the MVP? LOL I don't remember that! That guy? That's always injured? He's like the softest guy in the league, how the heck did he win MVP?
It's a movie yes...but it has the truth in it... patterns are prevalent in the universe. You should know this. You ever experience synchronicty?
Well anyway, thanks for your comment.
But Rose was the MVP? LOL I don't remember that! That guy? That's always injured? He's like the softest guy in the league, how the heck did he win MVP?
It's a movie yes...but it has the truth in it... patterns are prevalent in the universe. You should know this. You ever experience synchronicty?
Well anyway, thanks for your comment.
But Rose was the MVP? LOL I don't remember that! That guy? That's always injured? He's like the softest guy in the league, how the heck did he win MVP?
It's a movie yes...but it has the truth in it... patterns are prevalent in the universe. You should know this. You ever experience synchronicty?
Well anyway, thanks for your comment.
But Rose was the MVP? LOL I don't remember that! That guy? That's always injured? He's like the softest guy in the league, how the heck did he win MVP?
That is an INCREDIBLE STAT that no one is thinking about -- MVP winners win the finals less than 30% of the time
While I agree that past stats ARE relevant, context is always important. On paper, and based on this season's results so far, the warriors are justifiably the favourites. Also, they have already made it past two rounds, so they are far more likely to win the championship now compared to the beginning of the playoffs. It wouldn't be at all surprising if this season's MVP (Curry) won the title. You also have to consider that many part MVPs were guys who CARRIED their teams through a season. While Curry has done that (to an extent), the Warriors are DEEP and a great TEAM. Which is a different scenario to, for example, LeBron's MVP seasons with the Cavs or Iverson with the 76ers - those teams relied COMPLETELY on their MVP. Just my thoughts...
That is an INCREDIBLE STAT that no one is thinking about -- MVP winners win the finals less than 30% of the time
While I agree that past stats ARE relevant, context is always important. On paper, and based on this season's results so far, the warriors are justifiably the favourites. Also, they have already made it past two rounds, so they are far more likely to win the championship now compared to the beginning of the playoffs. It wouldn't be at all surprising if this season's MVP (Curry) won the title. You also have to consider that many part MVPs were guys who CARRIED their teams through a season. While Curry has done that (to an extent), the Warriors are DEEP and a great TEAM. Which is a different scenario to, for example, LeBron's MVP seasons with the Cavs or Iverson with the 76ers - those teams relied COMPLETELY on their MVP. Just my thoughts...
Weren't u quitting the site, mr. Frank? At least that's what you said in your 'all in on clippers ml' thread..am I right, mr. Frank? Were you lying then? Would YOU take any advice regarding money from a proven liar?
Weren't u quitting the site, mr. Frank? At least that's what you said in your 'all in on clippers ml' thread..am I right, mr. Frank? Were you lying then? Would YOU take any advice regarding money from a proven liar?
Weren't u quitting the site, mr. Frank? At least that's what you said in your 'all in on clippers ml' thread..am I right, mr. Frank? Were you lying then? Would YOU take any advice regarding money from a proven liar?
I did that say. And I wasn't lying. I just changed my mind now.
You've never heard of someone changing their mind before?
Weren't u quitting the site, mr. Frank? At least that's what you said in your 'all in on clippers ml' thread..am I right, mr. Frank? Were you lying then? Would YOU take any advice regarding money from a proven liar?
I did that say. And I wasn't lying. I just changed my mind now.
You've never heard of someone changing their mind before?
shut up. u lost 100% of ur bankroll on clips... stop
Sore loser? If you followed me, that's your own fault. I felt strongly about the clippers or I'd of not risked everything on them.
As for me losing...Big deal. It was $100. Not the first time I've lost everything. I told you my bank was small. Just won $100 back on slots last night so now I have another bankroll to work with.
shut up. u lost 100% of ur bankroll on clips... stop
Sore loser? If you followed me, that's your own fault. I felt strongly about the clippers or I'd of not risked everything on them.
As for me losing...Big deal. It was $100. Not the first time I've lost everything. I told you my bank was small. Just won $100 back on slots last night so now I have another bankroll to work with.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.