I play NBA so little that I couldnt find a recent thread and will have to go dig up this seasons record...probly middle...hit huge last night tho w/lac,mia ats & ml......the heat owed me as im pretty sure my last nba plays was a losing heat pick....anyways
tonight I like SHAQs team....I also liked him last year and got burnt..lets hope for another big showing from Irving
TM SHAQ - 6 *** 3 u
under 285 ** 2.5
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I play NBA so little that I couldnt find a recent thread and will have to go dig up this seasons record...probly middle...hit huge last night tho w/lac,mia ats & ml......the heat owed me as im pretty sure my last nba plays was a losing heat pick....anyways
tonight I like SHAQs team....I also liked him last year and got burnt..lets hope for another big showing from Irving
In the past 18 years the total for this game has gone over 279 1 time (288). What's different about the game/teams this year? [/Quote
I agree Smush, even though the over hit in 2011 (I believe). If you look at the line-ups, there are a lot of bigs this year compared to in years past, hopefully less threes.
Also, I was at the sportsbook and I couldn't tell you how many people I heard saying "Man, they play no defense, it'll for sure go over" Vegas accommodates this, and I will be playing the Under at the last minute; after the public has pumped the number up even more.
I'm going with the Under...GL
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by Smushmachine]
In the past 18 years the total for this game has gone over 279 1 time (288). What's different about the game/teams this year? [/Quote
I agree Smush, even though the over hit in 2011 (I believe). If you look at the line-ups, there are a lot of bigs this year compared to in years past, hopefully less threes.
Also, I was at the sportsbook and I couldn't tell you how many people I heard saying "Man, they play no defense, it'll for sure go over" Vegas accommodates this, and I will be playing the Under at the last minute; after the public has pumped the number up even more.
not that this will now get read but I apologize missing all this discussion...busy day then long night w that game
VERY hard game to cap...alot of it is just paper capping...and obviously TEAM CHUCK wanted this way more...they played harder and it paid off....TWO YEARS in a row, SHAQ has now had the better team on paper.....and choked
someone remind me next year to FADE SHAQ....as for the over/under, the garbage at the end pushed it to 10 over....could have easily gone the other way
0
not that this will now get read but I apologize missing all this discussion...busy day then long night w that game
VERY hard game to cap...alot of it is just paper capping...and obviously TEAM CHUCK wanted this way more...they played harder and it paid off....TWO YEARS in a row, SHAQ has now had the better team on paper.....and choked
someone remind me next year to FADE SHAQ....as for the over/under, the garbage at the end pushed it to 10 over....could have easily gone the other way
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.