0 win NFL
underdogs of at least 6 points after week 4 are 17-0 ATS after their bye
week as long as their opponent is not a very hot team, winner of 5 or
more in a row. So, the play is: Oakland +7.
home underdogs of more than 6 points in weeks 2-16 are 22-0 ATS on 6-9 days of rest if they lost last game by more than 30 points and if they have at least 1 win: Play: Jets +10
A system that confirms both Oakland and Jets this week as good plays: After week 4 road favorites of 6-11.5 points are 0-18 ats after a win as 5-11 pts favorites if they only played 1 or no road games on the season. Both Denver and SD in this bad situation.
And if you need more reasons to take Jets: week 4-10 favorites after home win and cover as favorites of 2.5-14.5 points are 0-9 SU/ATS if they had 2 more turnovers than opponent in last game.
1-3 teams after at least 1 loss are 6-0 SU/ATS as home dogs in week 6 vs teams with 2 losses. The play is: St.Louis +3.5
My teasers:
Oakland +14 teased with Jets +17 Oakland +14 teased with St.Louis +10.5 Jets +17 teased with St.Louis +10.5 Oakland +14 teased with Jets +17 and St.Louis +10.5
0 win NFL
underdogs of at least 6 points after week 4 are 17-0 ATS after their bye
week as long as their opponent is not a very hot team, winner of 5 or
more in a row. So, the play is: Oakland +7.
home underdogs of more than 6 points in weeks 2-16 are 22-0 ATS on 6-9 days of rest if they lost last game by more than 30 points and if they have at least 1 win: Play: Jets +10
A system that confirms both Oakland and Jets this week as good plays: After week 4 road favorites of 6-11.5 points are 0-18 ats after a win as 5-11 pts favorites if they only played 1 or no road games on the season. Both Denver and SD in this bad situation.
And if you need more reasons to take Jets: week 4-10 favorites after home win and cover as favorites of 2.5-14.5 points are 0-9 SU/ATS if they had 2 more turnovers than opponent in last game.
1-3 teams after at least 1 loss are 6-0 SU/ATS as home dogs in week 6 vs teams with 2 losses. The play is: St.Louis +3.5
My teasers:
Oakland +14 teased with Jets +17 Oakland +14 teased with St.Louis +10.5 Jets +17 teased with St.Louis +10.5 Oakland +14 teased with Jets +17 and St.Louis +10.5
The Jets are also a 50 point swing play. The jets loss margin plus the broncos win margin from last week > 50. I don't have a record but it really really good. Still very difficult to put your money on the Jets... 1h might me the better way to go
The Jets are also a 50 point swing play. The jets loss margin plus the broncos win margin from last week > 50. I don't have a record but it really really good. Still very difficult to put your money on the Jets... 1h might me the better way to go
San Diego and Denver are 2 of the top 5 picks in the SuperContest packed with wiseguys/sharps and the public agrees with 85% of the money on the Chargers and Broncos.
Your comments are interesting but for me cannot overcome what we have seen with the hapless Raiders and Jets. Sounds like stats an offshore book came up with to try to get some action on the dogs.
San Diego and Denver are 2 of the top 5 picks in the SuperContest packed with wiseguys/sharps and the public agrees with 85% of the money on the Chargers and Broncos.
Your comments are interesting but for me cannot overcome what we have seen with the hapless Raiders and Jets. Sounds like stats an offshore book came up with to try to get some action on the dogs.
Wow, what utter nonsense. How many variables to make bad teams look like smart plays?
7 variables for OAK, few of which have any relevance to the game today or the team.
6 variables for the Jets.
I'd bet diamonds I could make similar 'trend' based picks for Denver and SD using similar variables.
You may well win 1 or 2 or even all 3 but the reasoning here is utter twaddle. I'm only surprised you didn't throw in 'if there's an R in the month' or 'when it's raining'.
Wow, what utter nonsense. How many variables to make bad teams look like smart plays?
7 variables for OAK, few of which have any relevance to the game today or the team.
6 variables for the Jets.
I'd bet diamonds I could make similar 'trend' based picks for Denver and SD using similar variables.
You may well win 1 or 2 or even all 3 but the reasoning here is utter twaddle. I'm only surprised you didn't throw in 'if there's an R in the month' or 'when it's raining'.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.