Alot of people see this line as silly.
My power ratings line on the game .........................................Packers -11.8
Seems like alot of over-reaction to 1 game last week..................................
Alot of people see this line as silly.
My power ratings line on the game .........................................Packers -11.8
Seems like alot of over-reaction to 1 game last week..................................
Actually the line is correct....
If GB was a 3 point fav IN Minn...that means add 6 when they are home....Meaning GB-9 which it is right around
@minn -3
neutral -6
@Gb -9
Actually the line is correct....
If GB was a 3 point fav IN Minn...that means add 6 when they are home....Meaning GB-9 which it is right around
@minn -3
neutral -6
@Gb -9
Actually the line is correct....
If GB was a 3 point fav IN Minn...that means add 6 when they are home....Meaning GB-9 which it is right around
@minn -3
neutral -6
@Gb -9
Glad someone on these boards can perform grade 2 math.
Actually the line is correct....
If GB was a 3 point fav IN Minn...that means add 6 when they are home....Meaning GB-9 which it is right around
@minn -3
neutral -6
@Gb -9
Glad someone on these boards can perform grade 2 math.
1st week in Dec @GB, AP ran for 210 and GB won by 9
1st week in Dec @GB, AP ran for 210 and GB won by 9
They would've gotten a bye with a win....... So for them to play Seattle again Atlanta would've had to beat Chicago, and Seattle would've had to beat Washington, to meet in the divisional round. That's a lot of things that needed to happen for them to meet- I'm sure that wasn't on their mind.
They would've gotten a bye with a win....... So for them to play Seattle again Atlanta would've had to beat Chicago, and Seattle would've had to beat Washington, to meet in the divisional round. That's a lot of things that needed to happen for them to meet- I'm sure that wasn't on their mind.
They would've gotten a bye with a win....... So for them to play Seattle again Atlanta would've had to beat Chicago, and Seattle would've had to beat Washington, to meet in the divisional round. That's a lot of things that needed to happen for them to meet- I'm sure that wasn't on their mind.
My apologies, as this scenario still wouldn't have mean they would meet. They would've only met in the conference championship.
They would've gotten a bye with a win....... So for them to play Seattle again Atlanta would've had to beat Chicago, and Seattle would've had to beat Washington, to meet in the divisional round. That's a lot of things that needed to happen for them to meet- I'm sure that wasn't on their mind.
My apologies, as this scenario still wouldn't have mean they would meet. They would've only met in the conference championship.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.