All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Rams season win total Under 6 +100

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3091
Posts: 37
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55433
Posted: #1
If you dont bet this you should stop gambling.

Losses:

@Detroit
@Chicago
GB
Ne
SF x2
Jets
@ Seattle

They have to go 7-1 in there other 8 games to beat me, or 6-2 if they pull an upset. Will they be better than last year? Probably. Turn 2 wins into 7? Not gonna happen. Bradford still has no one to throw the ball to and the defense is middle of the pack. You cant win games in the NFL with a team like this. Rams go 4-12 this year at best......




 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 5107
Posted: #2

NYJ and @SEA are very winnable

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55433
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by arkadymo:

NYJ and @SEA are very winnable

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2005
Posts: 4705
Posted: #4
Train, I agree - it seems very worst you could do is push, although I do think Jets will not be good this year and Rams could win it, but no way they win at Seattle.  Train, take a look at the Browns schedule, please tell me how they get near the 5 1/2 wins at most sites.  Ditto, Dolphins and 7 wins.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 3348
Posted: #5
Guess I should stop gambling then
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 207
Posted: #6
I can see 5 wins... maybe 6. But I dont think their play will be indicative of their record. They'll be a lot better than last year but their record won't show it because they have a hard schedule this year
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55433
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by EazyFBaby:

Guess I should stop gambling then
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1971
Posted: #8
was gona load up on this play but my book only lets me play $300 max/play. Rams is my favorite team but 6 wins is gona be too much for them this year.. LOVE this play a lot 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 10748
Posted: #9
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 6587
Posted: #10
I am on this play as well Train gl.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #11
i think the rams win at least 6 and probably 7.  i guess we'll see by the end of the season. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 2355
Posted: #12
How much did you actually put on this Train?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 5046
Posted: #13
most  people overate Jeff fisher

 your bet   looks good to me , 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 2355
Posted: #14
I put a bunch of money on St.L over 5.5 and feel pretty good about it. I guess only time will tell... 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 6735
Posted: #15
I can see them going 5-11 or worse pretty easily. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55433
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by robbypants:

I put a bunch of money on St.L over 5.5 and feel pretty good about it. I guess only time will tell... 


I have just under a grand spread out a a couple places, also parlayed with some other futures. Where did they improve? They are gonna be the same team as last year. Jeff Fisher cant make them better with the same people. Sure they will win a game or 2 more, but 7 wins seems very unrealistic to me considering I really think they have 7/8 losses from the get go (listed above), and none of the other games are gonna be gimmes......



 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #17
st. louis led the league in one category that is alrgely due to bad luck.  in fact, they were the worst in this category in the nfl since 2002.  does anyone know what category this is and why st. louis may not be as bad as you think if you just look at last year's performance.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 1529
Posted: #18
I think this is a very solid play, THX for sharing!  I've been looking at Miami under 6.5 for a while now and strongly leaning under there as well.  Thoughts on that?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 3266
Posted: #19
locked and loaded TRAIN U6 at +120....GL this year
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 25178
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

st. louis led the league in one category that is alrgely due to bad luck.  in fact, they were the worst in this category in the nfl since 2002.  does anyone know what category this is and why st. louis may not be as bad as you think if you just look at last year's performance.
I guess and guess only. Number of starters lost due to injury ?

I have no interest in a win total on the Rams. Fisher can make bad teams better, but underachieves with more talented rosters. He's a master of mediocrity and gets paid well for it.

Jacksonville over 5.5 is the only futures bet I made, and I couldn't be happier with it. I'll be stunned if they don't win 7. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 3310
Posted: #21
Rams are still bottom feeders, they might win 6 or 7 this year, but i highly doubt it. Steven Jackson needs to get the fuck outta there.

bol 2 ya man.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 5
Posted: #22
Rams should be an improved team, softer schedule, Fisher is an upgrade over Spagnuolo.  They are going to run the ball a lot and be conservative on offense, Bradford is solid if he can stay healthy but they lack play makers on offense.  I don't think their win total will ultimately reflect their improvement.  Tough to see them winning 7 games, but i think 5-6 is a possibility.  
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

I guess and guess only. Number of starters lost due to injury ?

I have no interest in a win total on the Rams. Fisher can make bad teams better, but underachieves with more talented rosters. He's a master of mediocrity and gets paid well for it.

Jacksonville over 5.5 is the only futures bet I made, and I couldn't be happier with it. I'll be stunned if they don't win 7. 


yes, they were destroyed by injuries.  they had a -5 turnover margin.  when these two areas revert back to normal, the rams will be several wins better and some people will wonder why.

that mjd situation ended the only way it could and the way everyone knew it would.  mjd had less leverage than the shit referees. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #24
Looks easy, if it was last year.  Problem is, it's 2012.

Losses:
GB
Ne
SF x2

That's it.  The rest are winnable.  Not saying they WILL win, but they only need to win 6.  And you didn't include the easy games.  JMO
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 55433
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:

Looks easy, if it was last year.  Problem is, it's 2012.

Losses:
GB
Ne
SF x2

That's it.  The rest are winnable and very losable..  Not saying they WILL win, but they only need to win 6 (7).  And you didn't include the easy games.  JMO


Easy games? For the Rams? Please enlighten me.....

Fixed it in blue.
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.