| Author: |
[NFL Betting] Topic: Is Cleveland retarded? |
|
TRAIN69 |
RSI   View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: BetOnline.ag | |
Legend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30201
Location: Missouri |
#1 Posted: 4/26/2012 8:33:45 PM Trade up one spot,from 4 to 3, but also give up their 4th (118), 5th (139) and 7th round pick (211) ......To get Richardson......who nobody else was gonna move up to take.....
friggin Browns.....no wonder they suck behind every year. Who was in the war room that gave that decision the thumbs up? WTF? |
|
quote |
|
ZippyChippy |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 349
Location: New York |
#2 Posted: 4/26/2012 8:36:16 PM |
|
quote |
|
Lundegaard |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2368
Location: United States |
#3 Posted: 4/26/2012 8:39:01 PM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
GWYNN8 |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3786
Location: California |
#4 Posted: 4/26/2012 8:47:49 PM   |
|
quote |
|
Kurshka |
RSI |
MVP
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15154
Location: California |
#5 Posted: 4/26/2012 8:50:04 PM Dallas traded up for Barron? I bet they could have stayed at #14 and got him. Bad move IMO. Think Cox or Claiborne would have been the pick.
Train for once I agree with you. NFL has turned to a passing league and would never take a RB that high. |
|
quote |
|
|
|
Kurshka |
RSI |
MVP
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15154
Location: California |
#6 Posted: 4/26/2012 8:53:00 PM |
|
quote |
|
TRAIN69 |
RSI |
Legend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30201
Location: Missouri |
#7 Posted: 4/26/2012 8:57:37 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by ZippyChippy:
Tampa was gonna trade up. Cleveland did give up a lot though.
Tampa wasnt gonna take Richardson even if they did trade up to #3.....Clev got the player they wwanted no matter what.
Dallas with a great move to get Claiborne at #6 and only giving up a 2nd round pick.
STL really fucked up by trading the #2 so early to Wash. They could have got a much better deal if they waited til testerday or this morning. |
|
quote |
|
Lundegaard |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: 5Dimes | |
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2368
Location: United States |
#8 Posted: 4/26/2012 9:11:58 PM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
Laroja |
RSI  |
Captain
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 9684
Location: Ontario |
#9 Posted: 4/26/2012 10:04:20 PM
|
|
quote |
|
IgetMoney101 |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6141
Location: Michigan |
#10 Posted: 4/26/2012 11:12:41 PM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
thisguyiswise |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6861
Location: Wisconsin |
#11 Posted: 4/26/2012 11:16:46 PM
asante samuel for 6th round pick, morris claiborne for 2nd. its crazy, i get the money but still |
|
quote |
|
TRAIN69 |
RSI |
Legend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30201
Location: Missouri |
#12 Posted: 4/26/2012 11:18:42 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by IgetMoney101:
Jets would have traded for that spot. Cleveland needs a bloody wr and qb. How many times do teams get a quality rb in rds 2-4 but instead they trade up to get Richardson at 3?
I dont think the Jets would have selected Richardson |
|
quote |
|
thisguyiswise |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6861
Location: Wisconsin |
#13 Posted: 4/26/2012 11:24:50 PM |
|
quote |
|
TRAIN69 |
RSI |
Legend
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30201
Location: Missouri |
#14 Posted: 4/26/2012 11:27:58 PM QUOTE Originally Posted by thisguyiswise:
jets were not getting richardson, they would have had to trade basically their whole draft
Who would they have selected then? WHy would the Browns give a away 3 additional picks to move up 1 spot to get a player they would gave got anyway? |
|
quote |
|
CCMKD |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Prospect
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 57
Location: |
#15 Posted: 4/27/2012 12:15:58 AM
Dallas with the move of the night IMO...great stuff
|
|
quote |
|
mattbrot |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4954
Location: United States |
#16 Posted: 4/27/2012 12:38:11 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Who would they have selected then? WHy would the Browns give a away 3 additional picks to move up 1 spot to get a player they would gave got anyway?
Train.. It is not so much that they traded up one spot (that in itself would of been stupid). It is that they feared other teams would of traded for that spot to get TR. Other teams, who wanted TR, knew that cleveland was going to take him (right or wrong) and therefore Cleveland decided that they could not let that happen. |
|
quote |
|
BarcsHasBite |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | My Sportsbook: Pinnacle Sports | |
Veteran
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3369
Location: Ontario |
#17 Posted: 4/27/2012 1:11:30 AM
|
|
quote |
|
ArtSchlichterJr |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 828
Location: United States |
#18 Posted: 4/27/2012 1:13:21 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by mattbrot:
Train.. It is not so much that they traded up one spot (that in itself would of been stupid). It is that they feared other teams would of traded for that spot to get TR. Other teams, who wanted TR, knew that cleveland was going to take him (right or wrong) and therefore Cleveland decided that they could not let that happen. Plus they have 13 picks this draft... Aint signing 13 players.....Got a great Rb and a flyer on a potential sleeper QB... IMO Oak St QB just may be the steal of the 1st round ... In todays NFL a quality QB is a must now worth a gamble to try and find one.. Great draft for the Browns today.. |
|
quote |
|
Lucan |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1566
Location: United States |
#19 Posted: 4/27/2012 4:09:31 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Trade up one spot,from 4 to 3, but also give up their 4th (118), 5th (139) and 7th round pick (211) ......To get Richardson......who nobody else was gonna move up to take.....
friggin Browns.....no wonder they suck behind every year. Who was in the war room that gave that decision the thumbs up? WTF?
Browns or a lucky team picking up Richardson, the trade up was a good move. If you think nobody else was going to try and get him your dead wrong Train.
He's a workhorse and will be ready on day one, and he don't fumble the ball either, and is great catching the ball when Colt has to get rid of the ball fast.
Enjoy the moment...its going to be fun to watch the next Emmit Smith in NFL.
Richardson will be rookie of the year!!!
Browns learned their lesson from last year passing up Julio Jones, when players leave Alabama and or elite players from high school to college you can't keep letting other teams draft them if theres a why you can improve your team.
If you won't to talk about a bad pick they made you can say Weeden was it. Colt McCoy is a better QB. Paying Weeden millions coming out the 1st round is stupid at his age. |
|
quote |
|
Lucan |
RSI |
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1566
Location: United States |
#20 Posted: 4/27/2012 4:25:59 AM Browns or a lucky team picking up Richardson, the trade up was a good move. If you think nobody else was going to try and get him your dead wrong Train.
He's a workhorse and will be ready on day one, and he don't fumble the ball either, and is great catching the ball when Colt has to get rid of the ball fast.
Enjoy the moment...its going to be fun to watch the next Emmit Smith in NFL.
Richardson will be rookie of the year!!!
Browns learned their lesson from last year passing up Julio Jones, when players leave Alabama and or elite players from high school to college you can't keep letting other teams draft them if theres a way you can improve your team.
If you won't to talk about a bad pick they made you can say Weeden was it. Colt McCoy is a better QB. Paying Weeden millions coming out the 1st round is stupid at his age. |
|
quote |
|
GunShard |
RSI  |
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1134
Location: United States |
#21 Posted: 4/27/2012 6:54:01 AM QUOTE Originally Posted by Lucan:
Browns or a lucky team picking up Richardson, the trade up was a good move. If you think nobody else was going to try and get him your dead wrong Train.
He's a workhorse and will be ready on day one, and he don't fumble the ball either, and is great catching the ball when Colt has to get rid of the ball fast.
Enjoy the moment...its going to be fun to watch the next Emmit Smith in NFL.
Richardson will be rookie of the year!!!
Browns learned their lesson from last year passing up Julio Jones, when players leave Alabama and or elite players from high school to college you can't keep letting other teams draft them if theres a way you can improve your team.
If you won't to talk about a bad pick they made you can say Weeden was it. Colt McCoy is a better QB. Paying Weeden millions coming out the 1st round is stupid at his age.
Eagles runningback Lesean Mccoy is very Emmitt Smith like. |
|
quote |
|
FlamingoBarnes |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1013
Location: |
#22 Posted: 4/27/2012 7:13:41 AM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |
|
FlamingoBarnes |
View Space | Friends | Playbook | |
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1013
Location: |
#23 Posted: 4/27/2012 8:29:20 AM |
|
quote |
|
packers1992 |
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook | |
Captain
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7066
Location: Michigan |
#24 Posted: 4/27/2012 9:39:00 AM flamingo enough about mccoy he's not a franchise qb. I said it to jacksmack the browns can get andre johnson calivin johnson and larry fitzgerald tomrrow and with mccoy or weeden you'll be 6-10. Pur Rodgers on the browns they're 8-8 because aaron makes everybody better. Mccoy doesn't
It tells you all you need to know that his teammates didn't fight James Harrison when he used that cheap hit on that thursday game. If he was the guy they would've fought and beat the crap out of harrison
As far as richardson this is 2012 not 1954 should've taken blackmon. 2 wasted picks |
|
quote |
|
IgetMoney101 |
RSI |
Captain
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6141
Location: Michigan |
#25 Posted: 4/27/2012 10:05:20 AM |
|
Posted using a mobile device.quote |