Are you expecting a 1 pt win by Hofstra since JM hasnt beaten them going back at least 10 games. I know they play some tight games but Hofstra also blows them out every other year. Also on the Siena game, every major trend in the Siena matchup is pointing towards the under. Both have terrible defenses but they also have terrible offenses. I just don't see how you can take a JM team that hasnt beat Hofstra in years but I guess anyone is due.
Hofstra has had their # lately, yes. But, as I stated, they've had a much better defense in past years than this year. Also, James Madison was viewed there for a few years as one of the worst teams in the country. Over the past four years, they have improved a vast amount. I'm more worried about a letdown coming off of GM and ODU than the history in the series.
As for the other game you metioned, I'm not sure where you think they have terrible offenses. Rider's most recent results include 80, 57 (Fairfield #12 defense in nation), 96, 77, 82, 88, 78, 77, 74. The Siena offense hasn't been all that great, but they have been better at home (like most teams), and they'll enjoy a higher paced game. You could be right, whatever trend you're referring to could continue. I just think there is going to be plenty of opportunities and plenty of trips up and down the court that will help push this up and over.
Are you expecting a 1 pt win by Hofstra since JM hasnt beaten them going back at least 10 games. I know they play some tight games but Hofstra also blows them out every other year. Also on the Siena game, every major trend in the Siena matchup is pointing towards the under. Both have terrible defenses but they also have terrible offenses. I just don't see how you can take a JM team that hasnt beat Hofstra in years but I guess anyone is due.
Hofstra has had their # lately, yes. But, as I stated, they've had a much better defense in past years than this year. Also, James Madison was viewed there for a few years as one of the worst teams in the country. Over the past four years, they have improved a vast amount. I'm more worried about a letdown coming off of GM and ODU than the history in the series.
As for the other game you metioned, I'm not sure where you think they have terrible offenses. Rider's most recent results include 80, 57 (Fairfield #12 defense in nation), 96, 77, 82, 88, 78, 77, 74. The Siena offense hasn't been all that great, but they have been better at home (like most teams), and they'll enjoy a higher paced game. You could be right, whatever trend you're referring to could continue. I just think there is going to be plenty of opportunities and plenty of trips up and down the court that will help push this up and over.
Already in at +2, hoping to get another half point as the day goes on...
Do you see value in Northeastern -4.5, i know they are struggling but this seems like a winnable game for them. I know you like Bill and Mary if they hit the three. I am just asking do you see value in -4.5??
Already in at +2, hoping to get another half point as the day goes on...
Do you see value in Northeastern -4.5, i know they are struggling but this seems like a winnable game for them. I know you like Bill and Mary if they hit the three. I am just asking do you see value in -4.5??
LOVE YOUR CARD TODAY, looked into all games. The only one i am iffy about is the sien a over, i feel like we will know within the first 10 min if that one will hit. if both teams are shooting poorly i will likely that the second half under for 2 dimes.
GL bud. Hope we clean up today. I hammered both the Packers and Stellers yesterday and am playing with house money right now!!!!!
LOVE YOUR CARD TODAY, looked into all games. The only one i am iffy about is the sien a over, i feel like we will know within the first 10 min if that one will hit. if both teams are shooting poorly i will likely that the second half under for 2 dimes.
GL bud. Hope we clean up today. I hammered both the Packers and Stellers yesterday and am playing with house money right now!!!!!
first off mad props to you on the almost hit on the JM game; takes some balls to make a call like that; the trends I was referring to were all the under trends that were going in that game. There were 3 significant under trends that and nothing really pointing to an over. Siena only hit 23% in the first half and so I took them -3 and barely hit it. Your over hit easily. I follow trends somewhat but not always. Some are just flat out hard to ignore. For instance last week when KU played at Baylor and the road teams was 13-0 ATS. Stuff like that is hard to follow. You seem to have a vast knowledge about a ton of schools especially the smaller ones. I just wonder is that what you try to stick to versus capping bigger schools. It just seems like you take a lot of 2 pt away dogs which if you are a little off you will get wacked or it will go down to the wire. In college bball there are so many missed lines and with your knowledge of those smaller schools there are just a lot of different games it seems you could easily hit that others could not. Either way nice day today
first off mad props to you on the almost hit on the JM game; takes some balls to make a call like that; the trends I was referring to were all the under trends that were going in that game. There were 3 significant under trends that and nothing really pointing to an over. Siena only hit 23% in the first half and so I took them -3 and barely hit it. Your over hit easily. I follow trends somewhat but not always. Some are just flat out hard to ignore. For instance last week when KU played at Baylor and the road teams was 13-0 ATS. Stuff like that is hard to follow. You seem to have a vast knowledge about a ton of schools especially the smaller ones. I just wonder is that what you try to stick to versus capping bigger schools. It just seems like you take a lot of 2 pt away dogs which if you are a little off you will get wacked or it will go down to the wire. In college bball there are so many missed lines and with your knowledge of those smaller schools there are just a lot of different games it seems you could easily hit that others could not. Either way nice day today
neil, Nice night on the hardcourts. I got lucky and parlayed a 2 teamer ML ND and Morehead. Pd. about 12-1. Thanks.
Today I really like the Boilers getting 7 1/2. Doesn't that line have to come down? Purdue's sos is much stronger than OSU. Your thoughts? Thanks and GL to us all today.
neil, Nice night on the hardcourts. I got lucky and parlayed a 2 teamer ML ND and Morehead. Pd. about 12-1. Thanks.
Today I really like the Boilers getting 7 1/2. Doesn't that line have to come down? Purdue's sos is much stronger than OSU. Your thoughts? Thanks and GL to us all today.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.