thats wasn't a FUCKING INTERCEPTION !!!!!!! Bama/LSU

Forum: College Football Page 2 of 2  1 2  
Author: [College Football] Topic: thats wasn't a friggin INTERCEPTION !!!!!!! Bama/LSU
phark PM phark
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5187
Pennsylvania
 
phark
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:08:37 AM

That was a catch at the goaline IMO. He had possession when he landed.

Lvdonkey PM Lvdonkey
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1633
Nevada
 
Lvdonkey
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:12:10 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by phark:

That was a catch at the goaline IMO. He had possession when he landed.


yes and if he had hung onto the ball through the ground, a tie possession goes to the receiver.. he let it be taken away so it was a pick, pretty clear to see.  Anyone who watched it and thinks it was anything other than a pick doesn't know the rules of the game.
bpilktree PM bpilktree
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 93
 
bpilktree
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:12:12 AM
As an Alabama fan I can say that he didn't catch the ball though he should have the defender  just made a great play.  Howeve to say that LSU was better makes me laugh.  They were not better though they won because of the FG kicker.  LSU did absobuletly nothing on offense the entire game and niether did Alabama really.  As soon as it went into overtime I know LSU was probally going to win becuase of the fg kicker.  Alabama offense had to score a TD if they were going to win because we all saww how the kicker is.  LSU has a very good kicker and Alabama does not.  I really hate the OT rule when teams have good defenses like this because it is basically who has the better kicker.  LSU did not drive on Alabama at all in the game and if it was the same rules as NFL Alabma wins or they are still playing.
Frenchy PM Frenchy
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 172
 
Frenchy
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:12:29 AM
To say that wasn't an interception is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.  WOW!!!!
ccbulldog PM ccbulldog
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1079
Mississippi
 
ccbulldog
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:12:43 AM
Dude! I had money on Bama and even I could tell on the replay it was an interception. The Bama receiver was bobbling the ball on the way down and it wound up in the defenders hands. Just face it!
By the way, Saban made some dumb behind calls in that game. And that really shocked me because I thought he was the best x and 0 s coach in the Country.
Ocean808 PM Ocean808
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 557
Hawaii
 
Ocean808
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:16:15 AM
 Bama  needs a new kicker.  Enough said.
dcmc34f PM dcmc34f
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5363
Georgia
 
dcmc34f
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:18:06 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by BamaRollTide1:

darn them Refs that wasn't a INTERCEPTION Dumb person the player had hit the ground on his back the ball is dead

Bama first and goal you God Damn Mother guy !!!!!!!!

Why was a receiver throwing a pass in that situation in the first place? This thread was started from a Alabama fan of course. The refs made the right call. Roll Tide, whatever that means.
MastaLock PM MastaLock
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1098
New Jersey
 
MastaLock
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:20:12 AM
He had the ball in his hands on his back.. ball should be dead at that point for that slight sec... then defender grabbed it which moved the ball.. thats a bullshit call.. and there is no point of reviews because there has been many times this year in college where the refs go and clearly look on a camera at the plays and still get it wrong its a friggin joke.. that was a catch and down by contact clear as day 
Jwiseguy1 PM Jwiseguy1
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
Idaho
 
Jwiseguy1
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:20:34 AM
Alabama played a great game.. LSU played a great game. When you enter in the discussion a refs decision or other... your making excuses.  I wish they both would have lost, but not real.  Hate the SEC and always will.  
ccbulldog PM ccbulldog
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1079
Mississippi
 
ccbulldog
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:24:27 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by MastaLock:

He had the ball in his hands on his back.. ball should be dead at that point for that slight sec... then defender grabbed it which moved the ball.. thats a bullshit call.. and there is no point of reviews because there has been many times this year in college where the refs go and clearly look on a camera at the plays and still get it wrong its a friggin joke.. that was a catch and down by contact clear as day 


No, he did not have the ball laying on the ground. Go back and watch the play again in slo mo. If what you say was true, it would have been reversed. Take off those crimson covered glasses.
Frenchy PM Frenchy
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 172
 
Frenchy
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:25:18 AM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by MastaLock:

He had the ball in his hands on his back.. ball should be dead at that point for that slight sec... then defender grabbed it which moved the ball.. thats a bullshit call.. and there is no point of reviews because there has been many times this year in college where the refs go and clearly look on a camera at the plays and still get it wrong its a friggin joke.. that was a catch and down by contact clear as day 

 

The dude never had complete control.   Goodness.  My wife,who never watches football called it an int.    Get over it.  You all sound silly

Win12345 PM Win12345
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1281
United States
 
Win12345
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:36:34 AM
LSU scored a TD really darn the out of bounds. So really they kicker had nothing to do with it.
Ocean808 PM Ocean808
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 557
Hawaii
 
Ocean808
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 12:55:57 AM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by Win12345:

LSU scored a TD really darn the out of bounds. So really they kicker had nothing to do with it.

What are you talking about?

riq PM riq
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 781
California
 
riq
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 1:00:54 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by theguru1:

if any honest person who is neutral on who won the game like me and says that the tight end didnt have possession and down when his back touched the ground then ur a fuckin liar cuz it was plain as day on the replay and then lsu player stripped it after he was on his back with possession. obviously the replay official wanted lsu to win. and then i am not so sure about the hold on the int runback that would have been another td. 14 pts off the board for bama that changed the whole outcome of the game on thos two plays.


yeah right, he never had full possession, you have to maintain possession all the way to the ground and apparently he didn't. only thing thats obvious here is that you have no friggin clue
dont_bet PM dont_bet
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 781
 
dont_bet
Participation Meter
Posted: 11/6/2011 1:02:53 AM
an INT?  The catch was not not even clean....replay show his hand was still wobbling!  Too bad LSU stole from his hand or did he ahnd it over for the fix?  rofl
Forum: College Football Page 2 of 2  1 2  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.