Super Bowl play on Bears +3000 What ?

Forum: NFL Betting Page 1 of 2  1 2  
Author: [NFL Betting] Topic: Super Bowl play on Bears +3000 What ?
JackSmack PM JackSmack
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11911
South Carolina
 
JackSmack
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/9/2012 11:08:13 PM

I bet this comes down a bit before the season. Forte-Bush. Marshall-Hester-Jeffrey-Bennett. Earl Bennett can play. If Cutler plays like he did last year, you never know.

46989 PM 46989
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 930
New Jersey
 
46989
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/11/2012 8:58:18 PM
I love it. They were playing well last season 7-3 and on a roll. Cutler went down and that was it. They also lost Forte too. The defense is always solid. Love the pickups they made also and in my opinion they had a good draft. I have $150 on it to win $3500. It also helps that they play the soft NFC West. Solid prop bet.
46989 PM 46989
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 930
New Jersey
 
46989
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/11/2012 8:59:11 PM
Ive been watching this its been bouncing around between +2000 and 3000 it seems.
EazyFBaby PM EazyFBaby
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3263
United States
 
EazyFBaby
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/12/2012 12:07:50 AM
Yeah I like it... good D and Cutler's got his boy back with him... watch out for these guys
mrquija27 PM mrquija27
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3050
Michigan
 
mrquija27
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/12/2012 7:47:18 AM
Its a very good play.  I think Green Bay gets out of the way for Detroit or Chicago to take the division.
JackSmack PM JackSmack
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11911
South Carolina
 
JackSmack
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/12/2012 1:31:32 PM
Thanks, but You think Green Bay will be 3rd in conference?I dont know about that. I think for the value Chicago is worth a few hundred bucks for sure but I still like Green Bay to win it all if odds werent involved.
JackSmack PM JackSmack
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11911
South Carolina
 
JackSmack
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/12/2012 1:32:46 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by 46989:

Ive been watching this its been bouncing around between +2000 and 3000 it seems.

it was at 3000 at 5dimes when I made the thread. 2000 seems more correct if you ask me.

chillinmcm PM chillinmcm
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4304
Ontario
 
chillinmcm
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/12/2012 3:14:25 PM
I'm locked and loaded with the Bears for +4200 at Pinnacle
drunkskunk PM drunkskunk
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 154
Kansas
 
drunkskunk
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/14/2012 12:29:54 AM
for some reason i dont think we'll see much out of forte this year.
Colts03 PM Colts03
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 13377
Texas
 
Colts03
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/14/2012 12:18:14 PM
not a chance.  cutler will have a mental breakdown and be replaced by week 7 
THEMUGG PM THEMUGG
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 31017
Washington
 
THEMUGG
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/14/2012 2:48:26 PM
 A better play might be the Seahawks @ 40/1..........they get the soft NFC central ('cept GB of course), very winnable roadies @ Carolina, Detroit, Miami, & Buffalo. If they can split with SF then 12-4/11-5 is attainable. 
iamnotpeterose PM iamnotpeterose
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 258
 
iamnotpeterose
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/19/2012 6:37:18 PM
On it also two bets at 30and 35 to1
JackSmack PM JackSmack
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11911
South Carolina
 
JackSmack
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/19/2012 7:57:08 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

 A better play might be the Seahawks @ 40/1..........they get the soft NFC central ('cept GB of course), very winnable roadies @ Carolina, Detroit, Miami, & Buffalo. If they can split with SF then 12-4/11-5 is attainable. 

I like the seahawks but I like the Bears and the defense much better. Not sold on Flynn either. Gotta prove it for more than a game a year.  If it doesnt pan out for Flynn he could always be a Matt Damon stunt double. They look alot alike don't you think!

DoubleUp4Life PM DoubleUp4Life
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 37013
New York
 
DoubleUp4Life
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/19/2012 9:50:33 PM
Call me a Homer but why not throw a few bucks on the Bills at 70-1 ????

very nice offseason for a team that started 5-2
depeche2 PM depeche2
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 67006
Illinois
 
depeche2
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/19/2012 11:20:16 PM
Great value.  Health is a big wildcard, gotta have a lot go right, but the pieces are there for this to be the best most complete Bears team that Lovie Smith has had.
GunShard PM GunShard
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1524
United States
 
GunShard
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/21/2012 4:56:02 AM

Make sure Matt Forte signed the contact before placing a bet on this team.

I don't understand why the Bears didn't draft OL in the NFL draft. Cutler gets sacked too much every season.

Biscuit PM Biscuit
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1469
 
Biscuit
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/21/2012 1:33:55 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by GunShard:

I don't understand why the Bears didn't draft OL in the NFL draft. Cutler gets sacked too much every season.



I was wondering about that, too.   I'd like to see what Cutler could do behind a decent OL for one season


Biscuit PM Biscuit
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1469
 
Biscuit
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/21/2012 2:03:32 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

 A better play might be the Seahawks @ 40/1..........they get the soft NFC central ('cept GB of course), very winnable roadies @ Carolina, Detroit, Miami, & Buffalo. If they can split with SF then 12-4/11-5 is attainable. 


How do you sell that?

I could see an argument for the Bears.....decent QB and RB, added a ProBowl receiver in the off season, decent D and good special teams with Peppers, Urlacher, Briggs, Hester, etc.   Also they were in the NFC championship game recently, and (possibly) could've made it again last year except for injuries.   So, a SB is possible, if they're a bit lucky.

Seahawks have a good RB and defensive secondary, but not sure about their offense with Flynn @ QB..   I think making the playoffs is possible, and (maybe) winning one playoff home game is about the best that they could do.

BTW they are 50-1 @ 5D


chillinmcm PM chillinmcm
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4304
Ontario
 
chillinmcm
Participation Meter
Posted: 5/21/2012 3:36:58 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:

Call me a Homer but why not throw a few bucks on the Bills at 70-1 ????

very nice offseason for a team that started 5-2
Like that bet to, small wager on the Bills, they are 83-1 at pinnacle
JackSmack PM JackSmack
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11911
South Carolina
 
JackSmack
Participation Meter
Posted: 6/12/2012 9:07:39 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by JackSmack:

I like the seahawks but I like the Bears and the defense much better. Not sold on Flynn either. Gotta prove it for more than a game a year.  If it doesnt pan out for Flynn he could always be a Matt Damon stunt double. They look alot alike don't you think!

Coach Pete Carroll said that Tarvaris Jackson currently has his nose in front of Matt Flynn for the starting quarterback job.

mischkin04 PM mischkin04
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1728
Florida
 
mischkin04
Participation Meter
Posted: 6/12/2012 7:27:57 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by JackSmack:

Coach Pete Carroll said that Tarvaris Jackson currently has his nose in front of Matt Flynn for the starting quarterback job.

  The incumbent usually does have an edge this time of year.

mischkin04 PM mischkin04
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1728
Florida
 
mischkin04
Participation Meter
Posted: 6/12/2012 7:37:48 PM

    25-1 on up looks great for da Bearsss. I think da Billsss have to fight the real uphill battle just to get there, so no way I'd take them at less than 70-1. As far as Seattle goes,  ,maybe in a few years.

      GL      Sept. can't get here soon enough 

Dubfire PM Dubfire
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 625
California
 
Dubfire
Participation Meter
Posted: 6/13/2012 1:49:57 AM
QUOTE Originally Posted by mrquija27:

Its a very good play.  I think Green Bay gets out of the way for Detroit or Chicago to take the division.

The lions are not a good football team. All flash and no substance. Their lines will be inflated due to the big name fantasy football players like stafford and johnson. I can't wait to fade them in certain spots this season. 
bigbill365 PM bigbill365
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1867
United States
 
bigbill365
Participation Meter
Posted: 6/18/2012 2:52:03 PM
why not just throw 100 on the cleveland browns and then another 100 down the toilet
mrquija27 PM mrquija27
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3050
Michigan
 
mrquija27
Participation Meter
Posted: 6/18/2012 8:12:54 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by Dubfire:


The lions are not a good football team. All flash and no substance. Their lines will be inflated due to the big name fantasy football players like stafford and johnson. I can't wait to fade them in certain spots this season. 

Oh....

Well actually if you wanna know the truth.  The Detroit Lions are in the process of building a very productive franchise.  They currently have probably the best youngest offense in the entire league and will be great for years to come as long as Stafford stays healthy.  Now we will faulter at times do to our horrible secondary.  But we have a very strong defensive line and they are also young.  I think it will take another draft or two to solidfy our defense but lets be clear here they are building it correctly.    To say the Lions have no substance is an absolute joke!!!

Forum: NFL Betting Page 1 of 2  1 2  
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.