I'm glad you started coming around again. Posters like you and Max Demon are doing a good job of speaking for the modern day Republican party, and the forum is better off for it.
You know, the interesting thing is I can name a few Presidents, Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, who all had some things in common; they were Republicans who did not act against Soviet military aggression. And we aren't talking about a little area like Crimea. We are talking about countries like Hungary, Afghan, Poland, etc. And we aren't talking about occupation or influence, we are talking about military invasion.
If the Republican's complaints about Obama were transformed to the same during Reagan or Eisenhower's actions (or lack thereof), they would be disgraced rather than complimented for their foreign policy prowess.
Food for thought.
I'm glad you started coming around again. Posters like you and Max Demon are doing a good job of speaking for the modern day Republican party, and the forum is better off for it.
You know, the interesting thing is I can name a few Presidents, Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, who all had some things in common; they were Republicans who did not act against Soviet military aggression. And we aren't talking about a little area like Crimea. We are talking about countries like Hungary, Afghan, Poland, etc. And we aren't talking about occupation or influence, we are talking about military invasion.
If the Republican's complaints about Obama were transformed to the same during Reagan or Eisenhower's actions (or lack thereof), they would be disgraced rather than complimented for their foreign policy prowess.
Food for thought.
I'm glad you started coming around again. Posters like you and Max Demon are doing a good job of speaking for the modern day Republican party, and the forum is better off for it.
You know, the interesting thing is I can name a few Presidents, Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, who all had some things in common; they were Republicans who did not act against Soviet military aggression. And we aren't talking about a little area like Crimea. We are talking about countries like Hungary, Afghan, Poland, etc. And we aren't talking about occupation or influence, we are talking about military invasion.
If the Republican's complaints about Obama were transformed to the same during Reagan or Eisenhower's actions (or lack thereof), they would be disgraced rather than complimented for their foreign policy prowess.
Food for thought.
Well said. The radical right around here will never understand if you pounded it in their head with a mallet.
I'll never forget GW Bush saying.." it's none of our business"... when over a million refugees were suffering in Bosnia. And then he goes and attacks the wrong country.. a real genius he was.
And the right wing nuts around here were proud when they said they voted for him. Something they will not own up too, now they claim to be Independent, LOL.
I'm glad you started coming around again. Posters like you and Max Demon are doing a good job of speaking for the modern day Republican party, and the forum is better off for it.
You know, the interesting thing is I can name a few Presidents, Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, who all had some things in common; they were Republicans who did not act against Soviet military aggression. And we aren't talking about a little area like Crimea. We are talking about countries like Hungary, Afghan, Poland, etc. And we aren't talking about occupation or influence, we are talking about military invasion.
If the Republican's complaints about Obama were transformed to the same during Reagan or Eisenhower's actions (or lack thereof), they would be disgraced rather than complimented for their foreign policy prowess.
Food for thought.
Well said. The radical right around here will never understand if you pounded it in their head with a mallet.
I'll never forget GW Bush saying.." it's none of our business"... when over a million refugees were suffering in Bosnia. And then he goes and attacks the wrong country.. a real genius he was.
And the right wing nuts around here were proud when they said they voted for him. Something they will not own up too, now they claim to be Independent, LOL.
The left didn't attack Palin and Christie, they exposed them for the phonies they were.
When you said, Another great man from KY can reach the people, I almost barfed.. The guy has no clue, just like you probably think his dad is a great man, Wrong.. he is just another radical that hasn't thought through the consequences of his statements.
The left didn't attack Palin and Christie, they exposed them for the phonies they were.
When you said, Another great man from KY can reach the people, I almost barfed.. The guy has no clue, just like you probably think his dad is a great man, Wrong.. he is just another radical that hasn't thought through the consequences of his statements.
GW was " Brilliant " LOL
GW was " Brilliant " LOL
I'm not talking establishment GOP. I'm talking the man you mentioned in post #1, Reagan.
I'm not talking establishment GOP. I'm talking the man you mentioned in post #1, Reagan.
He stands for everythiing you represent.
Anti-abortion, anti-g-a-y, and wants the US to become more involved in the Ukraine situation.
As well as keeping the drug war status quo.
He stands for everythiing you represent.
Anti-abortion, anti-g-a-y, and wants the US to become more involved in the Ukraine situation.
As well as keeping the drug war status quo.
God I've missed you. The real voice of right wing reason.
Now, we can agree that sanctions only work if other countries join right?
And you do understand that sanctions don't have an immediate impact?
So, here's an article talking about how the sanctions will work (if others join).
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/03/26/russia-sanctions/6864355/
Here is one that explains how sanctions would hurt us more.
Here is one talking about the impact of sanctions.
Here is another discussion on the possible impact.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-26720147
In other words, there is no clear solution.
But we can guarentee that certain posters will be opposed to whatever the President does and certain posters will be supportive no matter what.
My advice to both is to read and expand your mind.
God I've missed you. The real voice of right wing reason.
Now, we can agree that sanctions only work if other countries join right?
And you do understand that sanctions don't have an immediate impact?
So, here's an article talking about how the sanctions will work (if others join).
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/03/26/russia-sanctions/6864355/
Here is one that explains how sanctions would hurt us more.
Here is one talking about the impact of sanctions.
Here is another discussion on the possible impact.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-26720147
In other words, there is no clear solution.
But we can guarentee that certain posters will be opposed to whatever the President does and certain posters will be supportive no matter what.
My advice to both is to read and expand your mind.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.