1. Name Calling "AKA Racists". Not regularly used here on Covers, at least the racists call, but a common practice on news shows when an Obama policy is criticized, i.e "If you don't like Obamacare you must be a racists", or "If you don't like raising the debt ceiling you must be a racists."
2. Distracting "AKA Pivoting or Changing the Subject". How many times is someone talking about a subject and the argument gets lost in gibberish brought on by a lib? This can also be referred to as the "Oooh, look squirrel" deflection.
3. Somebody Else Did it "AKA Two Wrongs Make a Right". I don't think I need to elaborate here.
4. The President wasn't aware. For example: Benghazi, IRS Targeting Conservative Groups, NSA Surveillance, Dept of Justice Wiretaps, "If you like your plan you can keep your plan", Obamacare website. I have a feeling this list may grow in the next three years.
5. It's a Far Right Conspiracy (or the Koch Brothers did it). This is an example of the liberal buzzwords I spoke about a few years ago.
6. You heard that on Faux News. I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I DJ Brow?
7. Argumentum Ad Misericordium "AKA Do it for the children". I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I Don Juan?
8. It's Bush's Fault. I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I 51% of voters?
1. Name Calling "AKA Racists". Not regularly used here on Covers, at least the racists call, but a common practice on news shows when an Obama policy is criticized, i.e "If you don't like Obamacare you must be a racists", or "If you don't like raising the debt ceiling you must be a racists."
2. Distracting "AKA Pivoting or Changing the Subject". How many times is someone talking about a subject and the argument gets lost in gibberish brought on by a lib? This can also be referred to as the "Oooh, look squirrel" deflection.
3. Somebody Else Did it "AKA Two Wrongs Make a Right". I don't think I need to elaborate here.
4. The President wasn't aware. For example: Benghazi, IRS Targeting Conservative Groups, NSA Surveillance, Dept of Justice Wiretaps, "If you like your plan you can keep your plan", Obamacare website. I have a feeling this list may grow in the next three years.
5. It's a Far Right Conspiracy (or the Koch Brothers did it). This is an example of the liberal buzzwords I spoke about a few years ago.
6. You heard that on Faux News. I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I DJ Brow?
7. Argumentum Ad Misericordium "AKA Do it for the children". I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I Don Juan?
8. It's Bush's Fault. I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I 51% of voters?
War on women would fall under #1: If you don't want to pay for some s-l-u-t-s birth control you must hate women.
Tax cuts for the rich and do it for the children falls under #7. If you cut taxes then children will starve or the poor will starve or you are throwing granny over the cliff.
Republican Jesus is just comic relief from Club Dirt. He is actually the biggest Holy Roller on Covers.
War on women would fall under #1: If you don't want to pay for some s-l-u-t-s birth control you must hate women.
Tax cuts for the rich and do it for the children falls under #7. If you cut taxes then children will starve or the poor will starve or you are throwing granny over the cliff.
Republican Jesus is just comic relief from Club Dirt. He is actually the biggest Holy Roller on Covers.
here's some information about the upcoming battle between Repoublican Jesus (representing the billionaires, of course) and a very watered down version of Regular Jesus (on the Pope's side). who do you got?
here's some information about the upcoming battle between Repoublican Jesus (representing the billionaires, of course) and a very watered down version of Regular Jesus (on the Pope's side). who do you got?
1. Name Calling "AKA Racists". Not regularly used here on Covers, at least the racists call, but a common practice on news shows when an Obama policy is criticized, i.e "If you don't like Obamacare you must be a racists", or "If you don't like raising the debt ceiling you must be a racists."
2. Distracting "AKA Pivoting or Changing the Subject". How many times is someone talking about a subject and the argument gets lost in gibberish brought on by a lib? This can also be referred to as the "Oooh, look squirrel" deflection.
3. Somebody Else Did it "AKA Two Wrongs Make a Right". I don't think I need to elaborate here.
4. The President wasn't aware. For example: Benghazi, IRS Targeting Conservative Groups, NSA Surveillance, Dept of Justice Wiretaps, "If you like your plan you can keep your plan", Obamacare website. I have a feeling this list may grow in the next three years.
5. It's a Far Right Conspiracy (or the Koch Brothers did it). This is an example of the liberal buzzwords I spoke about a few years ago.
6. You heard that on Faux News. I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I DJ Brow?
7. Argumentum Ad Misericordium "AKA Do it for the children". I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I Don Juan?
8. It's Bush's Fault. I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I 51% of voters?
1. Could it be certian members of the media are just pointing racist bigots that hate Obama care and raising the debt ceiling? Not necessarily calling people bigots and racist for being against these issues?
2. Could it be that most political issues are intertwined together? Republicans today have a huge problem comprehending this for some strange reason.
3. Why should a person/administration take responsibility for others dumba$$ actions?
4/5. Those are right wing conspiracies. There's a shitt load of them. One out of every hundred is actually real, though.
6. Fox News is propaganda news. It's not a myth. It's a fact.
7. Come on, really? Republicans invented the "It's for the children argument." Reaganists are responsible for coining that phrase.
8. This is a subjective argument. Bush and Cheney are responsible for so much damn shiit, that it’s hard to distinguish what they are responsible for and what they are not. Odds are they are responsible for it, though.
1. Name Calling "AKA Racists". Not regularly used here on Covers, at least the racists call, but a common practice on news shows when an Obama policy is criticized, i.e "If you don't like Obamacare you must be a racists", or "If you don't like raising the debt ceiling you must be a racists."
2. Distracting "AKA Pivoting or Changing the Subject". How many times is someone talking about a subject and the argument gets lost in gibberish brought on by a lib? This can also be referred to as the "Oooh, look squirrel" deflection.
3. Somebody Else Did it "AKA Two Wrongs Make a Right". I don't think I need to elaborate here.
4. The President wasn't aware. For example: Benghazi, IRS Targeting Conservative Groups, NSA Surveillance, Dept of Justice Wiretaps, "If you like your plan you can keep your plan", Obamacare website. I have a feeling this list may grow in the next three years.
5. It's a Far Right Conspiracy (or the Koch Brothers did it). This is an example of the liberal buzzwords I spoke about a few years ago.
6. You heard that on Faux News. I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I DJ Brow?
7. Argumentum Ad Misericordium "AKA Do it for the children". I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I Don Juan?
8. It's Bush's Fault. I don't think I need to elaborate here, do I 51% of voters?
1. Could it be certian members of the media are just pointing racist bigots that hate Obama care and raising the debt ceiling? Not necessarily calling people bigots and racist for being against these issues?
2. Could it be that most political issues are intertwined together? Republicans today have a huge problem comprehending this for some strange reason.
3. Why should a person/administration take responsibility for others dumba$$ actions?
4/5. Those are right wing conspiracies. There's a shitt load of them. One out of every hundred is actually real, though.
6. Fox News is propaganda news. It's not a myth. It's a fact.
7. Come on, really? Republicans invented the "It's for the children argument." Reaganists are responsible for coining that phrase.
8. This is a subjective argument. Bush and Cheney are responsible for so much damn shiit, that it’s hard to distinguish what they are responsible for and what they are not. Odds are they are responsible for it, though.
1. Could it be certian members of the media are just pointing racist bigots that hate Obama care and raising the debt ceiling? Not necessarily calling people bigots and racist for being against these issues?
2. Could it be that most political issues are intertwined together? Republicans today have a huge problem comprehending this for some strange reason.
3. Why should a person/administration take responsibility for others dumba$$ actions?
4/5. Those are right wing conspiracies. There's a shitt load of them. One out of every hundred is actually real, though.
6. Fox News is propaganda news. It's not a myth. It's a fact.
7. Come on, really? Republicans invented the "It's for the children argument." Reaganists are responsible for coining that phrase.
8. This is a subjective argument. Bush and Cheney are responsible for so much damn shiit, that it’s hard to distinguish what they are responsible for and what they are not. Odds are they are responsible for it, though.
You have provided bumper sticker slogans, which by the way could be #9, but have provided no proof. We've been down this road before. When you do this you sound like Don accusing Romney of being a tax.
1. Could it be certian members of the media are just pointing racist bigots that hate Obama care and raising the debt ceiling? Not necessarily calling people bigots and racist for being against these issues?
2. Could it be that most political issues are intertwined together? Republicans today have a huge problem comprehending this for some strange reason.
3. Why should a person/administration take responsibility for others dumba$$ actions?
4/5. Those are right wing conspiracies. There's a shitt load of them. One out of every hundred is actually real, though.
6. Fox News is propaganda news. It's not a myth. It's a fact.
7. Come on, really? Republicans invented the "It's for the children argument." Reaganists are responsible for coining that phrase.
8. This is a subjective argument. Bush and Cheney are responsible for so much damn shiit, that it’s hard to distinguish what they are responsible for and what they are not. Odds are they are responsible for it, though.
You have provided bumper sticker slogans, which by the way could be #9, but have provided no proof. We've been down this road before. When you do this you sound like Don accusing Romney of being a tax.
There
you go again taking up for Robney who stole his money from the middle
class with corp. takeovers. You're ashamed to admit you voted for him,
like all the other righty's here who call themselves Independents now,
LOL.
My proof his the fact that he refused to show all. What does that tell you ?
And, now you are beginning to doubt yourself, as you should, by
suggesting that I need someone to chime in for me, when you have two
goofballs chiming in for you, to whom I pay no attention.
I am my own man, I need NO reinforcements. I was following politics when you were being breastfed kiddo.
Presently, You are in you infant stages, politically speaking. Faux News, they have you conned.
There
you go again taking up for Robney who stole his money from the middle
class with corp. takeovers. You're ashamed to admit you voted for him,
like all the other righty's here who call themselves Independents now,
LOL.
My proof his the fact that he refused to show all. What does that tell you ?
And, now you are beginning to doubt yourself, as you should, by
suggesting that I need someone to chime in for me, when you have two
goofballs chiming in for you, to whom I pay no attention.
I am my own man, I need NO reinforcements. I was following politics when you were being breastfed kiddo.
Presently, You are in you infant stages, politically speaking. Faux News, they have you conned.
There
you go again taking up for Robney who stole his money from the middle
class with corp. takeovers. You're ashamed to admit you voted for him,
like all the other righty's here who call themselves Independents now,
LOL.
My proof his the fact that he refused to show all. What does that tell you ?
And, now you are beginning to doubt yourself, as you should, by
suggesting that I need someone to chime in for me, when you have two
goofballs chiming in for you, to whom I pay no attention.
I am my own man, I need NO reinforcements. I was following politics when you were being breastfed kiddo.
Presently, You are in you infant stages, politically speaking. Faux News, they have you conned.
#6
if you want to use #6 as a negative, you need to start quoting foxnews as your source so we can all see how that looks. and when we continue to post the nonsense that comes from those nuts, you defend it. otherwise, you aren't standing behind your list.
There
you go again taking up for Robney who stole his money from the middle
class with corp. takeovers. You're ashamed to admit you voted for him,
like all the other righty's here who call themselves Independents now,
LOL.
My proof his the fact that he refused to show all. What does that tell you ?
And, now you are beginning to doubt yourself, as you should, by
suggesting that I need someone to chime in for me, when you have two
goofballs chiming in for you, to whom I pay no attention.
I am my own man, I need NO reinforcements. I was following politics when you were being breastfed kiddo.
Presently, You are in you infant stages, politically speaking. Faux News, they have you conned.
#6
if you want to use #6 as a negative, you need to start quoting foxnews as your source so we can all see how that looks. and when we continue to post the nonsense that comes from those nuts, you defend it. otherwise, you aren't standing behind your list.
When I use FOX News as the source I do include it. The list I attached in post #1 didn't come from FOX News. FOX Lies/FAUX News is just one example the author listed as a "Liberal Tactic to Honest Debate."
I'm starting to get the feeling the reason people are having a problem with this list is because they plan on using many of these tactics put forth in this thread.
When I use FOX News as the source I do include it. The list I attached in post #1 didn't come from FOX News. FOX Lies/FAUX News is just one example the author listed as a "Liberal Tactic to Honest Debate."
I'm starting to get the feeling the reason people are having a problem with this list is because they plan on using many of these tactics put forth in this thread.
if you want to use #6 as a negative, you need to start quoting foxnews as your source so we can all see how that looks. and when we continue to post the nonsense that comes from those nuts, you defend it. otherwise, you aren't standing behind your list.
Surely Fox news is slanted right, just as its competition is slanted left.
Since there are a lot of people who claim fox news is nothing but lies then why don't you post some of them on here for us to see. They should be all over youtube right?
I know I can find a lot of stuff for its competition.
if you want to use #6 as a negative, you need to start quoting foxnews as your source so we can all see how that looks. and when we continue to post the nonsense that comes from those nuts, you defend it. otherwise, you aren't standing behind your list.
Surely Fox news is slanted right, just as its competition is slanted left.
Since there are a lot of people who claim fox news is nothing but lies then why don't you post some of them on here for us to see. They should be all over youtube right?
I know I can find a lot of stuff for its competition.
i contend that foxnews is the craziest, dumbest, weirdest, fake angriest, pedophiliest, religious freakshowiest, inbdrediest, unintentionally comedic channel/internet site that exists. as are most of its followers. yes, i suppose the left sites are terrible but foxnews gets its own category.
however, i agree that foxnews is at somewhat of a perception disadvantage since the left has some funny people who can exploit foxnews and show people how ridiculous it is while rightwingers are completely devoid of any humor whatsoever and have no one who is clever and funny enough to show up the liberal sites.
i contend that foxnews is the craziest, dumbest, weirdest, fake angriest, pedophiliest, religious freakshowiest, inbdrediest, unintentionally comedic channel/internet site that exists. as are most of its followers. yes, i suppose the left sites are terrible but foxnews gets its own category.
however, i agree that foxnews is at somewhat of a perception disadvantage since the left has some funny people who can exploit foxnews and show people how ridiculous it is while rightwingers are completely devoid of any humor whatsoever and have no one who is clever and funny enough to show up the liberal sites.
i contend that foxnews is the craziest, dumbest, weirdest, fake angriest, pedophiliest, religious freakshowiest, inbdrediest, unintentionally comedic channel/internet site that exists. as are most of its followers. yes, i suppose the left sites are terrible but foxnews gets its own category.
however, i agree that foxnews is at somewhat of a perception disadvantage since the left has some funny people who can exploit foxnews and show people how ridiculous it is while rightwingers are completely devoid of any humor whatsoever and have no one who is clever and funny enough to show up the liberal sites.
All bumper stickers.
Like Bowl said, surely you must have an example. You can even use a sound byte from The Daily Show or Colbert Report.
i contend that foxnews is the craziest, dumbest, weirdest, fake angriest, pedophiliest, religious freakshowiest, inbdrediest, unintentionally comedic channel/internet site that exists. as are most of its followers. yes, i suppose the left sites are terrible but foxnews gets its own category.
however, i agree that foxnews is at somewhat of a perception disadvantage since the left has some funny people who can exploit foxnews and show people how ridiculous it is while rightwingers are completely devoid of any humor whatsoever and have no one who is clever and funny enough to show up the liberal sites.
All bumper stickers.
Like Bowl said, surely you must have an example. You can even use a sound byte from The Daily Show or Colbert Report.
you find that on a bumper sticker, and i'll buy it. i'll also sue for copyright infringement.
i've posted plenty. you know how to search for them. but they set the bar so, high, i try to limit them to the best now. but you're right, i do only watch foxnews on youtube or through links via jon stewart and similar people.
i can post more if you are asking but i can't lower my standards and tarnish the good ClubDirt name. it has to be special crazy and stupid to be post-worthy when we are talking about foxnews.
you find that on a bumper sticker, and i'll buy it. i'll also sue for copyright infringement.
i've posted plenty. you know how to search for them. but they set the bar so, high, i try to limit them to the best now. but you're right, i do only watch foxnews on youtube or through links via jon stewart and similar people.
i can post more if you are asking but i can't lower my standards and tarnish the good ClubDirt name. it has to be special crazy and stupid to be post-worthy when we are talking about foxnews.
you find that on a bumper sticker, and i'll buy it. i'll also sue for copyright infringement.
i've posted plenty. you know how to search for them. but they set the bar so, high, i try to limit them to the best now. but you're right, i do only watch foxnews on youtube or through links via jon stewart and similar people.
i can post more if you are asking but i can't lower my standards and tarnish the good ClubDirt name. it has to be special crazy and stupid to be post-worthy when we are talking about foxnews.
Wow.
They are asking you for examples to prove your sweeping statement in a thread that was generated based on hyperbole and sweeping statements.
you find that on a bumper sticker, and i'll buy it. i'll also sue for copyright infringement.
i've posted plenty. you know how to search for them. but they set the bar so, high, i try to limit them to the best now. but you're right, i do only watch foxnews on youtube or through links via jon stewart and similar people.
i can post more if you are asking but i can't lower my standards and tarnish the good ClubDirt name. it has to be special crazy and stupid to be post-worthy when we are talking about foxnews.
Wow.
They are asking you for examples to prove your sweeping statement in a thread that was generated based on hyperbole and sweeping statements.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.