Bingo! Suited and booted... Excellent piece of work Phoenix and Over backers!
Suns
Over
Do you
think the Suns would cover when the referee didn't eject Crawford??
Clippers had 3-4 point lead and momentum was on their side. Clippers
were lost after Jamal Crawford was ejected. Over 214 came through for me. Think the Suns profited from the ejection.
Bingo! Suited and booted... Excellent piece of work Phoenix and Over backers!
Suns
Over
Do you
think the Suns would cover when the referee didn't eject Crawford??
Clippers had 3-4 point lead and momentum was on their side. Clippers
were lost after Jamal Crawford was ejected. Over 214 came through for me. Think the Suns profited from the ejection.
I
do think the Suns would have covered if Crawford was in the game or not AND if Jeff
Hornacek would have left Miles Plumlee on the floor down the stretch instead of
going with Alex Len who shoots free throws worst than DeAndre Jordan and Shaq O’Neal
combined, they would have won that game straight up...
I
think you posted in a prior thread coaches don’t matter its players that have
to execute; you could NOT be more wrong i.e. Popovich, Belichick and Jimmy
Johnson to name a few…If those “dudes”
were NOT calling the shots for their respective teams, those organizations
would NOT have won championships those years.
That's true that I wrote that coaches don't execute on the floor. I still stand to my comment but it was in reference to your comment on Monty Williams. Gotta see it in connection. Yeah they call the shots but they don't play the game 48 minutes. In your game prediction it sounded to me like 'New Orleans will lose this game vs the Lakers because Monty Williams coaches them'. I said that because your focus on the comment was on Williams and not the players matching up against each or which has better performed in their recent games and so on.
I still think the game wouldn't end up in OT and the Clippers would have won and very very likely cover the spread. Have watched the full game??
I
do think the Suns would have covered if Crawford was in the game or not AND if Jeff
Hornacek would have left Miles Plumlee on the floor down the stretch instead of
going with Alex Len who shoots free throws worst than DeAndre Jordan and Shaq O’Neal
combined, they would have won that game straight up...
I
think you posted in a prior thread coaches don’t matter its players that have
to execute; you could NOT be more wrong i.e. Popovich, Belichick and Jimmy
Johnson to name a few…If those “dudes”
were NOT calling the shots for their respective teams, those organizations
would NOT have won championships those years.
That's true that I wrote that coaches don't execute on the floor. I still stand to my comment but it was in reference to your comment on Monty Williams. Gotta see it in connection. Yeah they call the shots but they don't play the game 48 minutes. In your game prediction it sounded to me like 'New Orleans will lose this game vs the Lakers because Monty Williams coaches them'. I said that because your focus on the comment was on Williams and not the players matching up against each or which has better performed in their recent games and so on.
I still think the game wouldn't end up in OT and the Clippers would have won and very very likely cover the spread. Have watched the full game??
It's of course hypothetical how the would have turned out when Crawford wouldn't be ejected but hey everyone has a different opinion. I was flirting to take the Clippers minus the points but the over was a no-brainer with these two teams hence decided to switch from ATS to total.
It's of course hypothetical how the would have turned out when Crawford wouldn't be ejected but hey everyone has a different opinion. I was flirting to take the Clippers minus the points but the over was a no-brainer with these two teams hence decided to switch from ATS to total.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.