29, are you the same cat who posted as "mofome" on two sites across the street?
i think you are.
That's the problem your trying to think again.
I already answered your question in another thread, but here it is again. By the way Sherlock, all you have to do is a search on COVERS with the word "mofome" and you would see that there is an account that posts with that handle.
Huh? I have no idea what a "mofome" or an eog is.
You asked me the same thing back in 2010. (starting with post #132)
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?action=quote&ur=Lucan&id=109737887&spt=33&sub=100874774&page=6
All new members and all 'Bama fans should read your contributions in the above thread to get an accurate gauge of what your role is in this forum.
That's the problem your trying to think again.
I already answered your question in another thread, but here it is again. By the way Sherlock, all you have to do is a search on COVERS with the word "mofome" and you would see that there is an account that posts with that handle.
Huh? I have no idea what a "mofome" or an eog is.
You asked me the same thing back in 2010. (starting with post #132)
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?action=quote&ur=Lucan&id=109737887&spt=33&sub=100874774&page=6
All new members and all 'Bama fans should read your contributions in the above thread to get an accurate gauge of what your role is in this forum.
well g-guy i'll respectfully disagree with you on the vols. I've always been a butch jones fan going to back to his days at C.Michigan. I think they can win 7 games this yr. Here's where i see the wins
1. austin peay duh
2 WKU
3 S.Alabama
4. Mizzou that is a revenge game for the vols
5. Auburn
6. Vandy
7. Kentucky
but hey thats why they play the games BOL g-guy
well g-guy i'll respectfully disagree with you on the vols. I've always been a butch jones fan going to back to his days at C.Michigan. I think they can win 7 games this yr. Here's where i see the wins
1. austin peay duh
2 WKU
3 S.Alabama
4. Mizzou that is a revenge game for the vols
5. Auburn
6. Vandy
7. Kentucky
but hey thats why they play the games BOL g-guy
1. austin peay duh (win)
2 WKU (win)
3 S.Alabama (win)
4. Mizzou that is a revenge game for the vols (revenge does not work well on road. they'll be dogs for sure unless franklin hurt)
5. Auburn (malzahn's guys will move the ball in knoxville)
6. Vandy (don't sleep on ffranklin's group)
7. Kentucky (rivalry gm on road)
only 3 sure wins out of these 7. the other 4 are virtual toss ups.
5-7
let's talk when the 12 gms are done. i love butch jones and am well versed on his career. this is a rebuilding job. give him until yr 3 to get to 8 wins or more.
1. austin peay duh (win)
2 WKU (win)
3 S.Alabama (win)
4. Mizzou that is a revenge game for the vols (revenge does not work well on road. they'll be dogs for sure unless franklin hurt)
5. Auburn (malzahn's guys will move the ball in knoxville)
6. Vandy (don't sleep on ffranklin's group)
7. Kentucky (rivalry gm on road)
only 3 sure wins out of these 7. the other 4 are virtual toss ups.
5-7
let's talk when the 12 gms are done. i love butch jones and am well versed on his career. this is a rebuilding job. give him until yr 3 to get to 8 wins or more.
I wasn't going to bump this pathetic thread again, but since WahooS has already done so I will add further comments.
Why the fukk did you even create this thread?
The following is post #1 in a recent thread that you authored.
my style can be abrasive, i know that. i was not that way 25 yrs ago because i only had 7 yrs experience doing this.
now i've got 32 seasons under my belt and only a handful of losing ones.
i want to share what the vets shared w/me in my formative yrs.
i apologize for ruffling feathers. my bad.
let's move forward and talk some foots and help one another beat the books.
peace and love.
And then unprovoked you decide to call me out and accuse me of being some fucktard from another site that I have never even heard of let alone posted on. What did I do to arouse your ire? Is it the fact that Jimmy reported that I lived in an upper level income area that you probably couldn't afford?
Unlike you, I do not fukk with anyone on this site and don't even post anything unless I feel that it is constructive. So if you want to start a war with me, bring it on because I will gladly expose you for the phony attention person that you are.
You continually prove on a daily basis that you know NOTHING about college football.
And as far as your assesment of the 2013 Volunteers you again don't have a clue. Do you know why the SEC dominates every year? Do you know what the biggest difference between them and other conferences are? It's not QBs, RBs, WRs, TEs, or DBs, it's the size and speed of the defensive front 7. No other conference can come close to matching SEC productivity in that area. What must an SEC offense better have to survive in such a league? A good offensive line is what, and Tennessee has the best in the SEC East if not the entire SEC. They also return a QB and two RBs that have starting expierience and a JC transfer at TE. Sure they have very little proven talent at WR but this is the SEC, it's not as if they are going to be putting guys on the field that are not elite athletes.
Tennessee will be better than 5-7 and if they are not it won't be due to their "depleted offense" but rather to an inconsistant defense.
I wasn't going to bump this pathetic thread again, but since WahooS has already done so I will add further comments.
Why the fukk did you even create this thread?
The following is post #1 in a recent thread that you authored.
my style can be abrasive, i know that. i was not that way 25 yrs ago because i only had 7 yrs experience doing this.
now i've got 32 seasons under my belt and only a handful of losing ones.
i want to share what the vets shared w/me in my formative yrs.
i apologize for ruffling feathers. my bad.
let's move forward and talk some foots and help one another beat the books.
peace and love.
And then unprovoked you decide to call me out and accuse me of being some fucktard from another site that I have never even heard of let alone posted on. What did I do to arouse your ire? Is it the fact that Jimmy reported that I lived in an upper level income area that you probably couldn't afford?
Unlike you, I do not fukk with anyone on this site and don't even post anything unless I feel that it is constructive. So if you want to start a war with me, bring it on because I will gladly expose you for the phony attention person that you are.
You continually prove on a daily basis that you know NOTHING about college football.
And as far as your assesment of the 2013 Volunteers you again don't have a clue. Do you know why the SEC dominates every year? Do you know what the biggest difference between them and other conferences are? It's not QBs, RBs, WRs, TEs, or DBs, it's the size and speed of the defensive front 7. No other conference can come close to matching SEC productivity in that area. What must an SEC offense better have to survive in such a league? A good offensive line is what, and Tennessee has the best in the SEC East if not the entire SEC. They also return a QB and two RBs that have starting expierience and a JC transfer at TE. Sure they have very little proven talent at WR but this is the SEC, it's not as if they are going to be putting guys on the field that are not elite athletes.
Tennessee will be better than 5-7 and if they are not it won't be due to their "depleted offense" but rather to an inconsistant defense.
And then unprovoked you decide to call me out and accuse me of being some fucktard from another site that I have never even heard of let alone posted on. What did I do to arouse your ire? Is it the fact that Jimmy reported that I lived in an upper level income area that you probably couldn't afford?
Don't let him get to you.
And then unprovoked you decide to call me out and accuse me of being some fucktard from another site that I have never even heard of let alone posted on. What did I do to arouse your ire? Is it the fact that Jimmy reported that I lived in an upper level income area that you probably couldn't afford?
Don't let him get to you.
And as far as your assesment of the 2013 Volunteers you again don't have a clue. Do you know why the SEC dominates every year? Do you know what the biggest difference between them and other conferences are? It's not QBs, RBs, WRs, TEs, or DBs, it's the size and speed of the defensive front 7. No other conference can come close to matching SEC productivity in that area. What must an SEC offense better have to survive in such a league? A good offensive line is what, and Tennessee has the best in the SEC East if not the entire SEC. They also return a QB and two RBs that have starting expierience and a JC transfer at TE. Sure they have very little proven talent at WR but this is the SEC, it's not as if they are going to be putting guys on the field that are not elite athletes.
Tennessee will be better than 5-7 and if they are not it won't be due to their "depleted offense" but rather to an inconsistant defense.
And as far as your assesment of the 2013 Volunteers you again don't have a clue. Do you know why the SEC dominates every year? Do you know what the biggest difference between them and other conferences are? It's not QBs, RBs, WRs, TEs, or DBs, it's the size and speed of the defensive front 7. No other conference can come close to matching SEC productivity in that area. What must an SEC offense better have to survive in such a league? A good offensive line is what, and Tennessee has the best in the SEC East if not the entire SEC. They also return a QB and two RBs that have starting expierience and a JC transfer at TE. Sure they have very little proven talent at WR but this is the SEC, it's not as if they are going to be putting guys on the field that are not elite athletes.
Tennessee will be better than 5-7 and if they are not it won't be due to their "depleted offense" but rather to an inconsistant defense.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.