Spottie you really need to see if Quigley and Van Der Sloot are playing a the line suggests they are. If they are, then it might be a play on Sky. EDD hasn't been effective yet with her team mates but let's give them time to gel. Hard game to cap IMHO. I know I said I will Katy low for a bit but I love this league too much. Was just a little frustrated with the Lynxs poor performance in the 4Q
Spottie you really need to see if Quigley and Van Der Sloot are playing a the line suggests they are. If they are, then it might be a play on Sky. EDD hasn't been effective yet with her team mates but let's give them time to gel. Hard game to cap IMHO. I know I said I will Katy low for a bit but I love this league too much. Was just a little frustrated with the Lynxs poor performance in the 4Q
True that Aussie. After I saw how good the Sun were as dogs I immediately backed off because the simply cover as dogs.
Anyways as is the case again in this game there are questions and is it really something I NEED to play. Nope ! Sometimes these lines move on information and sometimes that information is not disclosed to us in time to make a strong decision.
Thank you for the heads up and maybe I should pass. It is an early game so I thought of getting some talk going
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
True that Aussie. After I saw how good the Sun were as dogs I immediately backed off because the simply cover as dogs.
Anyways as is the case again in this game there are questions and is it really something I NEED to play. Nope ! Sometimes these lines move on information and sometimes that information is not disclosed to us in time to make a strong decision.
Thank you for the heads up and maybe I should pass. It is an early game so I thought of getting some talk going
Here's some queries for you....teams that were poor last year, tend to not do well as conference away favorites.
HD and C and month<9 and opS(W)<15
21-16 ATS
14-23 OVER
If our home dog was an unexceptional team from last year the result change a little.
HD and C and month<9 and opS(W)<15 and tpS(W)<20
20-12 ATS
13-19 OVER
Finally a home conference dog that had a better record than their present opponent last year has been:
20-9 ATS
13-16 OVER
Awesome stuff for the home dog Indigo.
Like I said at first I was waiting for an opportunity to fire on the Mystics, but then I had to think about the other side. Play on the Mystics that really haven't played up to the lines that they have been dishing out? Not a good Idea.
I could only play the home dog here. I will wait for line movement and line ups.
Thank you for all the information gents!
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
Here's some queries for you....teams that were poor last year, tend to not do well as conference away favorites.
HD and C and month<9 and opS(W)<15
21-16 ATS
14-23 OVER
If our home dog was an unexceptional team from last year the result change a little.
HD and C and month<9 and opS(W)<15 and tpS(W)<20
20-12 ATS
13-19 OVER
Finally a home conference dog that had a better record than their present opponent last year has been:
20-9 ATS
13-16 OVER
Awesome stuff for the home dog Indigo.
Like I said at first I was waiting for an opportunity to fire on the Mystics, but then I had to think about the other side. Play on the Mystics that really haven't played up to the lines that they have been dishing out? Not a good Idea.
I could only play the home dog here. I will wait for line movement and line ups.
If Vandersloot and Quigley are in I will play some ML at odds 3.00
At the moment I have Chicago +5 at 2.04
Delle Donne went this summer to WASH in a big trade bringing Doolson Cooper and Coates to CHI, giving depth to the team. Both teams had problems this early season in the decision making, CHI without Vandersloot and Faulkner lack of a real PG but that makes Pondexter more involved and she is helping the team to score. WASH has never had a real PG and even signing Tolliver they find themselves in a position were a SG directs the team looking also to score herself and sometimes holding the ball too much. WASH has a very good shooting team and they don’t hesitate in taking them, being able to break games at any point but for me here there are several factors to consider. I find Mystics team quite unbalanced, DelleDonne as a center simply limits a lot the team rebounding wise and their defense to post players is unexistent, CHI has Boyette, Breland, Dolson and Coates (probably out today). They will contorl the rebound and if they are clever score a lot in the paint. CHI had to play lots of minutes with TYoung and Pondexter lately but they still were a team able to run. Today Quigley is upgraded as probable and she is a great scorer for the perimeter, Vandersloot is yet doubtfoul but I still think this handicap for CHI at home in a game probably whole team has something to proof against DelleDonne and they will be higher motivated than Mystic team is a play to make.
If Vandersloot and Quigley are in I will play some ML at odds 3.00
At the moment I have Chicago +5 at 2.04
Delle Donne went this summer to WASH in a big trade bringing Doolson Cooper and Coates to CHI, giving depth to the team. Both teams had problems this early season in the decision making, CHI without Vandersloot and Faulkner lack of a real PG but that makes Pondexter more involved and she is helping the team to score. WASH has never had a real PG and even signing Tolliver they find themselves in a position were a SG directs the team looking also to score herself and sometimes holding the ball too much. WASH has a very good shooting team and they don’t hesitate in taking them, being able to break games at any point but for me here there are several factors to consider. I find Mystics team quite unbalanced, DelleDonne as a center simply limits a lot the team rebounding wise and their defense to post players is unexistent, CHI has Boyette, Breland, Dolson and Coates (probably out today). They will contorl the rebound and if they are clever score a lot in the paint. CHI had to play lots of minutes with TYoung and Pondexter lately but they still were a team able to run. Today Quigley is upgraded as probable and she is a great scorer for the perimeter, Vandersloot is yet doubtfoul but I still think this handicap for CHI at home in a game probably whole team has something to proof against DelleDonne and they will be higher motivated than Mystic team is a play to make.
Like in other sports, teams that made the playoffs the year before are often overvalued while bettors ignore non-playoff teams. This contrarian system backs non-playoff teams that are favored against playoff teams from the year before. The Mystics had one of the worst records in the league last year but after trading for a former MVP candidate are now expected to contend for the league title.
Trend
Non-Playoff favorites in high total games.
This Betting System has gone 61-27 (69.3%) ATS, +31.2 units since 2009.
Our Pick
The Mystics opened as 2-point favorites in Chicago tonight. Bet on Washington and Elena Delle Donne when she takes on her former team.
Like in other sports, teams that made the playoffs the year before are often overvalued while bettors ignore non-playoff teams. This contrarian system backs non-playoff teams that are favored against playoff teams from the year before. The Mystics had one of the worst records in the league last year but after trading for a former MVP candidate are now expected to contend for the league title.
Trend
Non-Playoff favorites in high total games.
This Betting System has gone 61-27 (69.3%) ATS, +31.2 units since 2009.
Our Pick
The Mystics opened as 2-point favorites in Chicago tonight. Bet on Washington and Elena Delle Donne when she takes on her former team.
I'm 0-2 in this WNBA season and going Mystics TT over 84.5 and game over 164, 1st half might be slow early start but I think both teams need to get off their 1-2 poor records and for some reason Chi at home is a fast track, GL everyone
I'm 0-2 in this WNBA season and going Mystics TT over 84.5 and game over 164, 1st half might be slow early start but I think both teams need to get off their 1-2 poor records and for some reason Chi at home is a fast track, GL everyone
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.