Sorry for the week old response... Appreciate the comments, always a pleasure when I get a chance to post with you on here..even when it is a bit delayed and sporadic on my end...And to think it all began with a boxing
It has been a rough last few years for sure...I guess 3 ACC wins could be considered an improvement over the 1 from last year.
Thank god for pitchers and catcher reporting. Knowing I will get to see Halladay, Lee, and Hamels each take the mound every 5th day in a little over a month helps ease the pain a bit. The Twins can't possibly be as bad this year, can the?...Oh wait..nevermind...Carl Pavano is your #1 starter
Your coach has to be gone after this year right? Actually, with the dude at GTech, he isn't the worst in the ACC anymore.
As for your Twins comment
I think we may be a little better than people think this year. Certainly better than the 74 wins Vegas has us tabbed for.
Sorry for the week old response... Appreciate the comments, always a pleasure when I get a chance to post with you on here..even when it is a bit delayed and sporadic on my end...And to think it all began with a boxing
It has been a rough last few years for sure...I guess 3 ACC wins could be considered an improvement over the 1 from last year.
Thank god for pitchers and catcher reporting. Knowing I will get to see Halladay, Lee, and Hamels each take the mound every 5th day in a little over a month helps ease the pain a bit. The Twins can't possibly be as bad this year, can the?...Oh wait..nevermind...Carl Pavano is your #1 starter
Your coach has to be gone after this year right? Actually, with the dude at GTech, he isn't the worst in the ACC anymore.
As for your Twins comment
I think we may be a little better than people think this year. Certainly better than the 74 wins Vegas has us tabbed for.
state of Alabama has a similar bill in the works (senate bill 12)...could be voted on as early as this coming tuesday according to an article in the birmingham post herald
state of Alabama has a similar bill in the works (senate bill 12)...could be voted on as early as this coming tuesday according to an article in the birmingham post herald
Logically people who get pregnant 12 times are not responsible people whether they have an abortion 12 times or have 12 children.
It's irresponsible to get pregnant 12 times regardless of the outcome.
Therefore, abortion plays no part in your 'responsible vs. irresponsible people argument.
In fact, I would say it's FAR LESS RESPONSIBLE to have 12 children than 12 abortions considering the footprint every person on the planet leaves behind.
But then again, you don't care about concrete things, things that you can actually see and has an impact on your life and society (the environment, poverty etc).. you only care about imaginary things that you can't see... that people have told you is real and you should just believe (heaven, hell, 'sin in the eyes of god' etc).
Logically people who get pregnant 12 times are not responsible people whether they have an abortion 12 times or have 12 children.
It's irresponsible to get pregnant 12 times regardless of the outcome.
Therefore, abortion plays no part in your 'responsible vs. irresponsible people argument.
In fact, I would say it's FAR LESS RESPONSIBLE to have 12 children than 12 abortions considering the footprint every person on the planet leaves behind.
But then again, you don't care about concrete things, things that you can actually see and has an impact on your life and society (the environment, poverty etc).. you only care about imaginary things that you can't see... that people have told you is real and you should just believe (heaven, hell, 'sin in the eyes of god' etc).
I still don't understand this argument. It could be argued that having NO CHILDREN is more responsible than having 3 children. If that is my argument (it is in this debate), I would say it's more responsible to have 3 abortions than 3 children.
Abortion plays no part in your 'responsible people' argument because 'responsible' is a subjective term.
I guess you want to regulate a women's life to the point where she can only have sex/have children how/where/when YOU say so?
Interesting
Alright Bob, your cover is blown. Hiding behind an alias just to make leftists look worse than they already do. this is one of your best goes at it yet, i must say
I still don't understand this argument. It could be argued that having NO CHILDREN is more responsible than having 3 children. If that is my argument (it is in this debate), I would say it's more responsible to have 3 abortions than 3 children.
Abortion plays no part in your 'responsible people' argument because 'responsible' is a subjective term.
I guess you want to regulate a women's life to the point where she can only have sex/have children how/where/when YOU say so?
Interesting
Alright Bob, your cover is blown. Hiding behind an alias just to make leftists look worse than they already do. this is one of your best goes at it yet, i must say
state of Alabama has a similar bill in the works (senate bill 12)...could be voted on as early as this coming tuesday according to an article in the birmingham post herald
nice
Looks like the GOP HQ sent out a memo or something. It's their flavour of the week.
Reminds me of attention person with big egos... and rolling heads
state of Alabama has a similar bill in the works (senate bill 12)...could be voted on as early as this coming tuesday according to an article in the birmingham post herald
nice
Looks like the GOP HQ sent out a memo or something. It's their flavour of the week.
Reminds me of attention person with big egos... and rolling heads
Alright Bob, your cover is blown. Hiding behind an alias just to make leftists look worse than they already do. this is one of your best goes at it yet, i must say
fucking hilarious
At the risk of feeding into your stupidity, do share your concerns about my comments
Alright Bob, your cover is blown. Hiding behind an alias just to make leftists look worse than they already do. this is one of your best goes at it yet, i must say
fucking hilarious
At the risk of feeding into your stupidity, do share your concerns about my comments
At the risk of feeding into your stupidity, do share your concerns about my comments
i typed a long response, and then realized it was counter productive to feed into your trolling, so just go ahead living life married to all those faulty assumptions, and scratch your tiny head until it bleeds, wondering why your gods of science and mathematical models, are always wrong
At the risk of feeding into your stupidity, do share your concerns about my comments
i typed a long response, and then realized it was counter productive to feed into your trolling, so just go ahead living life married to all those faulty assumptions, and scratch your tiny head until it bleeds, wondering why your gods of science and mathematical models, are always wrong
i typed a long response, and then realized it was counter productive to feed into your trolling, so just go ahead living life married to all those faulty assumptions, and scratch your tiny head until it bleeds, wondering why your gods of science and mathematical models, are always wrong
'My trolling' now that's a laugh..
Translation: "I have no argument, you were right, and my foot tastes like ass, so I'ma take it out my mouth."
be easy, no need to apologize. I knew you had nothing despite the avalanche of rolling heads, which is why I asked you to clarify.
Just to point out, the reason I ignore you is so we don't run into these problems. Yet you keep attacking me out of nowhere then
... just give it up already.
Since mutual respect between us is at rock bottom, there is nowhere to go but up.
i typed a long response, and then realized it was counter productive to feed into your trolling, so just go ahead living life married to all those faulty assumptions, and scratch your tiny head until it bleeds, wondering why your gods of science and mathematical models, are always wrong
'My trolling' now that's a laugh..
Translation: "I have no argument, you were right, and my foot tastes like ass, so I'ma take it out my mouth."
be easy, no need to apologize. I knew you had nothing despite the avalanche of rolling heads, which is why I asked you to clarify.
Just to point out, the reason I ignore you is so we don't run into these problems. Yet you keep attacking me out of nowhere then
... just give it up already.
Since mutual respect between us is at rock bottom, there is nowhere to go but up.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.