But scalabrine doesn't care about that, he'd rather rant about a baker in Sweden who made a cake that resembled a black woman.
I guess scal is happy over 40% of the 1 million + annual abortions in America are done on black women.
But scalabrine doesn't care about that, he'd rather rant about a baker in Sweden who made a cake that resembled a black woman.
I guess scal is happy over 40% of the 1 million + annual abortions in America are done on black women.
But scalabrine doesn't care about that, he'd rather rant about a baker in Sweden who made a cake that resembled a black woman.
I guess scal is happy over 40% of the 1 million + annual abortions in America are done on black women.
Actually, the picture is more complex than you choose to present, if you delve deeper. The dot com bubble was certainly a large, if not the, reason for the GDP and federal revenue gains during this short explosion from 1997-2000.
Are you pretending federal policies did not influence this market?
For example, By 1998, the first full year in which the lower capital gains rates were in effect, venture capital activity reached almost $28 billion, more than a three-fold increase over 1995 levels, and by 1999, it had doubled yet again
Actually, the picture is more complex than you choose to present, if you delve deeper. The dot com bubble was certainly a large, if not the, reason for the GDP and federal revenue gains during this short explosion from 1997-2000.
Are you pretending federal policies did not influence this market?
For example, By 1998, the first full year in which the lower capital gains rates were in effect, venture capital activity reached almost $28 billion, more than a three-fold increase over 1995 levels, and by 1999, it had doubled yet again
scalabrine- are you serious? raising tax to 50%? So someone making 1 million gets half of it taken? haha wow what a joke. All the business owners would do is lay off a couple people maybe 10 to cover for that. How would that be good for the economy? Unemployment would go to 15-20%. I do agree with the capital gains to 35%. But it would take motivation away from people, hell I would want to make 999,999 not over one million. I think it should be 35%. Lets be honest what is the gov going to do with this money and is it even enough to touch the deficit? I dont think so. Tell Obama not to spend 5 trillion again for all these bullshit shovel ready jobs that lasted 2 months and not those same people are unemployed again
scalabrine- are you serious? raising tax to 50%? So someone making 1 million gets half of it taken? haha wow what a joke. All the business owners would do is lay off a couple people maybe 10 to cover for that. How would that be good for the economy? Unemployment would go to 15-20%. I do agree with the capital gains to 35%. But it would take motivation away from people, hell I would want to make 999,999 not over one million. I think it should be 35%. Lets be honest what is the gov going to do with this money and is it even enough to touch the deficit? I dont think so. Tell Obama not to spend 5 trillion again for all these bullshit shovel ready jobs that lasted 2 months and not those same people are unemployed again
No.
Are you pretending the tax cuts were the primary reason for the dramatic rise in GDP and revenue? To ignore the dot com boom as a large factor is errant.
No.
Are you pretending the tax cuts were the primary reason for the dramatic rise in GDP and revenue? To ignore the dot com boom as a large factor is errant.
Good for sweden, denmark and norway. What happen to the rest of Europe there broke as shit. An im just speaking from talking to some owners, including some family who own small businesses. Maybe some people dont, but I do no that some will. So either way it will effect unemployment. All business have some fat they can cut, but a lot of them dont want to because these people have familes but if it does go to 60% ( that is just insane) then fat gets cut
Good for sweden, denmark and norway. What happen to the rest of Europe there broke as shit. An im just speaking from talking to some owners, including some family who own small businesses. Maybe some people dont, but I do no that some will. So either way it will effect unemployment. All business have some fat they can cut, but a lot of them dont want to because these people have familes but if it does go to 60% ( that is just insane) then fat gets cut
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.