Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Like detroit and sd.
Big majority of the public is on sea and theres been no line movement. |
LOCK-BOSS | 11 |
|
|
Jags look good with bortles. Over seems like a long shot at this point.
|
nflbookiecrusha | 3 |
|
|
Jaguars +3 over 41
Good luck |
nflbookiecrusha | 3 |
|
|
Should be about 45°F. High humidity, low precipitation. Wind around 5 mph. Good football weather.
|
vetdrm | 7 |
|
|
Saints 31-27
|
Frank the Bank | 29 |
|
|
Makes no sense
|
ironlionzion722 | 6 |
|
|
Carolina D is fantastic this year and lately...
based off Saints playing at home and Carolina playing on the road, this game should be N.O. - 6. Overall all though I have it at -4. GL to all, on my side or not. |
nflbookiecrusha | 5 |
|
|
This is going to be a good game or Saints blow out the Panthers.
Take N.O up to -4. They should cover. I would like to say the under is a play too but based off of today's totals, I wouldn't touch it. A lot of games posted the over. |
nflbookiecrusha | 5 |
|
|
13 seems really high. It should be 10 max but more like 8.5
|
hankd59 | 10 |
|
|
Oh yeah.. det is good
|
rem_sleep | 23 |
|
|
Dunno wtf is up with indi, i wouldn't touch it.
like BUF F the Giants Play SF not SEA F the cowboys GL |
rem_sleep | 23 |
|
|
No
|
Sfbookiebuster | 2 |
|
|
Good call bookiebuster... wmi, give him a break dude of course he's not going to pay everyone's bets, do your own homework.
I like your system based off situational plays. Stats(the only place I disagree with you) could be the benefactor and make your plays that much better.BUT.. No doubt, situational plays are some of the strongest plays. Keep on making yourself $$$ |
Sfbookiebuster | 63 |
|
|
Number 1000. Sorry had to do it
|
BostonCelticFTW | 2161 |
|
|
I did play over 40.5 and lost that one though. Oh well I'm up for the week and have another left tonight to make up for last night.
|
nflbookiecrusha | 13 |
|
|
I didn't play it luckily. I would have played the redskins
|
nflbookiecrusha | 13 |
|
|
Thanks for the response. I like your point of view husky
|
nflbookiecrusha | 13 |
|
|
I like over 45 as well but, it is close.
@howie, why do you think that line is only -1. Shouldn't it be more? |
Howie_Doin | 222 |
|
|
I don't understand wash+1. It just doesn't make sense? Unless it's only based off being divisional.
The line should be wash -5/46.5. |
nflbookiecrusha | 13 |
|
|
Well 2-1 not bad... nc state shizz the bed on that one.
|
nflbookiecrusha | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.