I brought this up a few months back and the comments were rather funny.
The last 10 rounds in a major his playing partners have failed to break par. This includes the likes of Rose, Garcia, Mickelson, Bubba and Furyk and Wittenberg ( who probably played the best round out of all 10 rounds)
Counting the Masters( Bae, Jimenez, Swartz and Singh only 1 out of 16 rounds played with TW were sub 70 and that was a 69 bythe Mechanic in round 1.
Keep on thinking this man doesn't effect others playing with him.
I brought this up a few months back and the comments were rather funny.
The last 10 rounds in a major his playing partners have failed to break par. This includes the likes of Rose, Garcia, Mickelson, Bubba and Furyk and Wittenberg ( who probably played the best round out of all 10 rounds)
Counting the Masters( Bae, Jimenez, Swartz and Singh only 1 out of 16 rounds played with TW were sub 70 and that was a 69 bythe Mechanic in round 1.
Keep on thinking this man doesn't effect others playing with him.
He definately has an effect on people, but not to the level he used to. I can see this Olesen kid getting swallowed up tomorrow, but there's plenty at the top of that leaderboard that can handle playing with him just fine.
He definately has an effect on people, but not to the level he used to. I can see this Olesen kid getting swallowed up tomorrow, but there's plenty at the top of that leaderboard that can handle playing with him just fine.
That's nearly an automatic for me, I always look at who he's playing with on the weekend rounds, and you can sure bet that I'll be fading his partner tomorrow.
That's nearly an automatic for me, I always look at who he's playing with on the weekend rounds, and you can sure bet that I'll be fading his partner tomorrow.
Interesting,hoping to see him and either Scott or dufner in a Sunday pairing. That be good tv. I really like his chances tomorrow. How did tiger compare in those ten rounds? He and a mass amount of tv cameras are enough to make life tough for anyone.
Interesting,hoping to see him and either Scott or dufner in a Sunday pairing. That be good tv. I really like his chances tomorrow. How did tiger compare in those ten rounds? He and a mass amount of tv cameras are enough to make life tough for anyone.
Only third and fourth rounds count. Pairings on the weekend are set because of equal play. Tigers weekend record is losing against his playing partners this year. Tomorrow's round will be a different story.
Only third and fourth rounds count. Pairings on the weekend are set because of equal play. Tigers weekend record is losing against his playing partners this year. Tomorrow's round will be a different story.
[Quote: Originally Posted by MrBogey] another over par round by a player paired with TW, Too bad Sneds gagged it today....
Last time I checked you could win money betting on the first 2 rounds of a tournament so I am not sure what u mean when u say they dont count.
the whole fkn forum lost that matchup. [/Quotehe beat a 22 year old dane by what 2? Really rattled him. Hammer him to win tomorrow, remember if you are 2nd you are the first loser.
[Quote: Originally Posted by MrBogey] another over par round by a player paired with TW, Too bad Sneds gagged it today....
Last time I checked you could win money betting on the first 2 rounds of a tournament so I am not sure what u mean when u say they dont count.
the whole fkn forum lost that matchup. [/Quotehe beat a 22 year old dane by what 2? Really rattled him. Hammer him to win tomorrow, remember if you are 2nd you are the first loser.
personally I was impressed with Olesen and the way he kept his composure. not sure who you are talking about beating Olesen by 2
I was referring to Sned losing the 3rd round head to head vs Olesen.
I thought this thread and the last one was about how Tiger made everyone who he played with folded Sorry for letting facts get in the way of your thread.
personally I was impressed with Olesen and the way he kept his composure. not sure who you are talking about beating Olesen by 2
I was referring to Sned losing the 3rd round head to head vs Olesen.
I thought this thread and the last one was about how Tiger made everyone who he played with folded Sorry for letting facts get in the way of your thread.
Mr bogey likes to state how peoples knee shake playing with tiger and how you can make money. The fact is people don't crumble against tiger and the juice on tiger gives him no value and that is way Mr bogey is a statistical loser.
Mr bogey likes to state how peoples knee shake playing with tiger and how you can make money. The fact is people don't crumble against tiger and the juice on tiger gives him no value and that is way Mr bogey is a statistical loser.
as far as being a statistical loser I will just say
jack ass comments from guys like you make the golf forum almost unbearable about 4 times a year when the fly by nights show their faces. turned to shit. I
simply post facts. you being blind to the obvious is hilarious. I guess
it is total coincidence that players paired with Tiger have not broken
par in 11 straight rounds now.
as far as being a statistical loser I will just say
jack ass comments from guys like you make the golf forum almost unbearable about 4 times a year when the fly by nights show their faces. turned to shit. I
simply post facts. you being blind to the obvious is hilarious. I guess
it is total coincidence that players paired with Tiger have not broken
par in 11 straight rounds now.
The thread is about how you have been making money betting against tigers playing partner. I am only pointing out that your theory and thread about tiger pairing has no value and is a statistical loser. I did not ? Your overall record. Your thread has no value and I am warning the four times a year people to not follow your square no value play.
The thread is about how you have been making money betting against tigers playing partner. I am only pointing out that your theory and thread about tiger pairing has no value and is a statistical loser. I did not ? Your overall record. Your thread has no value and I am warning the four times a year people to not follow your square no value play.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.