Vancouver -.5 -115 (1st 60 min) to win $200. St .Louis played tough in Game #1 but the 2-1 final score wasn't indicative of a third period dominated by the Canucks. Despite getting the win Vancouver wasn't satisfied with nailbitting in the final minutes. The Blues haven't lost 2 in a row in forever but all good things come to an end. I expect fewer PP's for both sides and a more convincing effort from the Canucks on the ice and the scoreboard heading into enemy territory.
Vancouver -1.5 +170 reduced risk $100
Philadelphia/Pittsburgh OVER 5.5 -115 reduced to win $100. A much friendlier number for these 2 high octane offenses. After the first game jitters I expect this series to open up and more scoring this evening.
Carolina/New Jersey OT +333 risk $50. Think the Canes have a better effort tonight and this game goes longer than 60 minutes.
San Jose to win series -135 to win $200. I refuse to believe the Quacks are going to punk the Sharks and send them home in the first round.
Vancouver -.5 -115 (1st 60 min) to win $200. St .Louis played tough in Game #1 but the 2-1 final score wasn't indicative of a third period dominated by the Canucks. Despite getting the win Vancouver wasn't satisfied with nailbitting in the final minutes. The Blues haven't lost 2 in a row in forever but all good things come to an end. I expect fewer PP's for both sides and a more convincing effort from the Canucks on the ice and the scoreboard heading into enemy territory.
Vancouver -1.5 +170 reduced risk $100
Philadelphia/Pittsburgh OVER 5.5 -115 reduced to win $100. A much friendlier number for these 2 high octane offenses. After the first game jitters I expect this series to open up and more scoring this evening.
Carolina/New Jersey OT +333 risk $50. Think the Canes have a better effort tonight and this game goes longer than 60 minutes.
San Jose to win series -135 to win $200. I refuse to believe the Quacks are going to punk the Sharks and send them home in the first round.
That loss last night and getting booed off home ice in Game 1 actually made me want to get in on the Sharks if that makes any sense. I wasn't convinced before the series at the high price but after that pathetic performance last night I really believe the Sharks have fire under a redass the rest of the way. This is their year to make noise, not the Quacks. We'll see, but at -135 i'll take my chances.
That loss last night and getting booed off home ice in Game 1 actually made me want to get in on the Sharks if that makes any sense. I wasn't convinced before the series at the high price but after that pathetic performance last night I really believe the Sharks have fire under a redass the rest of the way. This is their year to make noise, not the Quacks. We'll see, but at -135 i'll take my chances.
Anyone look at Detroit @ -105 - 1.5 ? I jumped all over this rather than trying to pick a winner Between BOS and MON. Just thought it was a good value.... maybe ?
Anyone look at Detroit @ -105 - 1.5 ? I jumped all over this rather than trying to pick a winner Between BOS and MON. Just thought it was a good value.... maybe ?
Its only one game but the Devils had that look to them. The look of what it takes to win in the playoffs. They were outmuscling and outworking people in the corners, coming out with the pucks in tieups...beating people to loose pucks and blocking lots of shots. Plus they were flying on offense. If that happens again tonight, this series could be over in maybe 5
Its only one game but the Devils had that look to them. The look of what it takes to win in the playoffs. They were outmuscling and outworking people in the corners, coming out with the pucks in tieups...beating people to loose pucks and blocking lots of shots. Plus they were flying on offense. If that happens again tonight, this series could be over in maybe 5
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.