I have to say...i feel bad for those who had the colts at +7.5/ 8...cuz ive been on that side before...not only should henry gone down...the scoring play wasnt even reviewed...i thought all scoring plays were reviewed??? Tough loss for those who were in elation thinking that either game was over and won...or even those who were okay to take a push at +7. As SVP says...bad beat
I have to say...i feel bad for those who had the colts at +7.5/ 8...cuz ive been on that side before...not only should henry gone down...the scoring play wasnt even reviewed...i thought all scoring plays were reviewed??? Tough loss for those who were in elation thinking that either game was over and won...or even those who were okay to take a push at +7. As SVP says...bad beat
I did rewind it, looked like it. I believe it wasn't reviewed cause of Vegas tbh. There were to. Many spreads of - 6.5 and +7.50 so that middle hurt them
I did rewind it, looked like it. I believe it wasn't reviewed cause of Vegas tbh. There were to. Many spreads of - 6.5 and +7.50 so that middle hurt them
I did rewind it, looked like it. I believe it wasn't reviewed cause of Vegas tbh. There were to. Many spreads of - 6.5 and +7.50 so that middle hurt them
you can definitely say this game was shady.. NOT REVIEWING IT IS ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFUL...
I did rewind it, looked like it. I believe it wasn't reviewed cause of Vegas tbh. There were to. Many spreads of - 6.5 and +7.50 so that middle hurt them
you can definitely say this game was shady.. NOT REVIEWING IT IS ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFUL...
I thought all TOUCHDOWN's are reviewed upstairs by the booth?
Why wasn't Henry's last minute 72 yd scamper for a TD, reviewed by upstairs booth??
It looked like he was right on the very edge of the sidelines, for not 1 step, but actually 2 steps, were questionable. I do know that since Indianapolis was all out of timeouts, that they were not able to challenge that 72 yd TD run. But there is a rule that all Touchdown scores are always reviewed by the booth. Was it actually reviewed, and approved, thus explaining why they didnt reverse the call?
I thought all TOUCHDOWN's are reviewed upstairs by the booth?
Why wasn't Henry's last minute 72 yd scamper for a TD, reviewed by upstairs booth??
It looked like he was right on the very edge of the sidelines, for not 1 step, but actually 2 steps, were questionable. I do know that since Indianapolis was all out of timeouts, that they were not able to challenge that 72 yd TD run. But there is a rule that all Touchdown scores are always reviewed by the booth. Was it actually reviewed, and approved, thus explaining why they didnt reverse the call?
I thought all TOUCHDOWN's are reviewed upstairs by the booth?
Why wasn't Henry's last minute 72 yd scamper for a TD, reviewed by upstairs booth??
It looked like he was right on the very edge of the sidelines, for not 1 step, but actually 2 steps, were questionable. I do know that since Indianapolis was all out of timeouts, that they were not able to challenge that 72 yd TD run. But there is a rule that all Touchdown scores are always reviewed by the booth. Was it actually reviewed, and approved, thus explaining why they didnt reverse the call?
thats why I'm saying IT WAS SHADY....
look.. they reviewed and reversed a sure touchdown in the JETS game when SEFARIAN JERKINS was going in for TD...
we didn't even get a look LMFAO... and the ref running down the sideline.. are you kidding me right now?? LMFAO
I thought all TOUCHDOWN's are reviewed upstairs by the booth?
Why wasn't Henry's last minute 72 yd scamper for a TD, reviewed by upstairs booth??
It looked like he was right on the very edge of the sidelines, for not 1 step, but actually 2 steps, were questionable. I do know that since Indianapolis was all out of timeouts, that they were not able to challenge that 72 yd TD run. But there is a rule that all Touchdown scores are always reviewed by the booth. Was it actually reviewed, and approved, thus explaining why they didnt reverse the call?
thats why I'm saying IT WAS SHADY....
look.. they reviewed and reversed a sure touchdown in the JETS game when SEFARIAN JERKINS was going in for TD...
we didn't even get a look LMFAO... and the ref running down the sideline.. are you kidding me right now?? LMFAO
I thought all TOUCHDOWN's are reviewed upstairs by the booth?
Why wasn't Henry's last minute 72 yd scamper for a TD, reviewed by upstairs booth??
It looked like he was right on the very edge of the sidelines, for not 1 step, but actually 2 steps, were questionable. I do know that since Indianapolis was all out of timeouts, that they were not able to challenge that 72 yd TD run. But there is a rule that all Touchdown scores are always reviewed by the booth. Was it actually reviewed, and approved, thus explaining why they didnt reverse the call?
There is no booth anymore. All scores and turnovers now go to the NFL's NY office and they make the calls for all games.
How nice of the NFL to consolidate it's power in such a way, right?
I thought all TOUCHDOWN's are reviewed upstairs by the booth?
Why wasn't Henry's last minute 72 yd scamper for a TD, reviewed by upstairs booth??
It looked like he was right on the very edge of the sidelines, for not 1 step, but actually 2 steps, were questionable. I do know that since Indianapolis was all out of timeouts, that they were not able to challenge that 72 yd TD run. But there is a rule that all Touchdown scores are always reviewed by the booth. Was it actually reviewed, and approved, thus explaining why they didnt reverse the call?
There is no booth anymore. All scores and turnovers now go to the NFL's NY office and they make the calls for all games.
How nice of the NFL to consolidate it's power in such a way, right?
Because call on the field was ruled inbounds, it would then require an absolute certain overturn to reverse the call. So when booth reviewed the sidelines footsteps, it was unable to determine witn certainty and 100% positive visual evidence that whether he was indeed in or out of bounds, and with the fact, that the game was already decided and won by Tennessee, at that point it was irrelevant on determing the outcome of who would win the game. If anything the league continues to rebuild and reboost its brand. Ever since the NFL hit its lowest tv ratings about a month ago, when practically every nfl player was kneeling or staying in lockerroom during national anthem, the league has bizzarely surged, games are coming down to the wire more, more higher scoring games in general, and specifically higher scoring primetime games along with controversial calls, miracle endings, and specifically endings that affect the spread and/or total or both. All of this is actually good for the NFL business. It averts all of our attention to the games more, and less about the bad aspects and negative publicity of the game, such as anthem protests.
Tonight I again was truely burnt again, I did have a middle on this game, needed the final to remain as is, and that final 72 yd run, again cost me. Along with multiple frantic insane final finishes, such as that Chiefs miracle TD fumble return vs Skins. Along with most recent Jets TD that was overturned and ruled a fumble touchback.
I'm not for certain, what exactly is going on, but with sports betting becoming more and more discussed and acceptable in the USA.
Alot of sportsnetworks along with color commentators are more open to it, and ESPN has opened its arms to it.
Like the old saying goes "controversy creates cash".
Anything that had dramatic twists and insane endings is all good for the NFL. Now there will be all sorts of buzz regarding this dramatic ending. This seems to be more than a coincidence, that the majority of primetime games are going Over the total and quite a few are finishing with both controversial and miracle like finishes that involve the pointspread.
Because call on the field was ruled inbounds, it would then require an absolute certain overturn to reverse the call. So when booth reviewed the sidelines footsteps, it was unable to determine witn certainty and 100% positive visual evidence that whether he was indeed in or out of bounds, and with the fact, that the game was already decided and won by Tennessee, at that point it was irrelevant on determing the outcome of who would win the game. If anything the league continues to rebuild and reboost its brand. Ever since the NFL hit its lowest tv ratings about a month ago, when practically every nfl player was kneeling or staying in lockerroom during national anthem, the league has bizzarely surged, games are coming down to the wire more, more higher scoring games in general, and specifically higher scoring primetime games along with controversial calls, miracle endings, and specifically endings that affect the spread and/or total or both. All of this is actually good for the NFL business. It averts all of our attention to the games more, and less about the bad aspects and negative publicity of the game, such as anthem protests.
Tonight I again was truely burnt again, I did have a middle on this game, needed the final to remain as is, and that final 72 yd run, again cost me. Along with multiple frantic insane final finishes, such as that Chiefs miracle TD fumble return vs Skins. Along with most recent Jets TD that was overturned and ruled a fumble touchback.
I'm not for certain, what exactly is going on, but with sports betting becoming more and more discussed and acceptable in the USA.
Alot of sportsnetworks along with color commentators are more open to it, and ESPN has opened its arms to it.
Like the old saying goes "controversy creates cash".
Anything that had dramatic twists and insane endings is all good for the NFL. Now there will be all sorts of buzz regarding this dramatic ending. This seems to be more than a coincidence, that the majority of primetime games are going Over the total and quite a few are finishing with both controversial and miracle like finishes that involve the pointspread.
i took titans spread 7.5 before game. 6.5 in in game + money and money line + money in game...
who would take colts is an idiot..
a screw is the jets TE touchdown catch overturned for a fumble in end zone for a turnover....thats a darn...and every poster, commentator and reporter agrees with it.....jets still covered but over got fucked on that.
i took titans spread 7.5 before game. 6.5 in in game + money and money line + money in game...
who would take colts is an idiot..
a screw is the jets TE touchdown catch overturned for a fumble in end zone for a turnover....thats a darn...and every poster, commentator and reporter agrees with it.....jets still covered but over got fucked on that.
Guys, if you go on line to review in slow motion you will see he WAS NOT out of bounds. I'm not sure why they didn't review it, however, maybe they did upstairs immediately and radioed down....You can look at the run on line in slow motion...
Guys, if you go on line to review in slow motion you will see he WAS NOT out of bounds. I'm not sure why they didn't review it, however, maybe they did upstairs immediately and radioed down....You can look at the run on line in slow motion...
Today I heard something interesting. They interviewed the sportsbook manager from west gate. He said and I quote “best Sunday ever, we haven’t had a Sunday this good in many years”
This same bozo said that a couple weeks ago claiming books had a great week... now I recall seeing that sport books don’t make as much money as table games and slot machines... this is incredible that sports books are cleaning up.. I do know these oddsmakers are truly brilliant people with lots of information(although they can’t cure cancer) and what not... but I’ve never seen double digit faves lose straight up in the same year week in and week out at this clip...something is definitely up... I think I’m going to sit out now as it’s just too volatile... GL gents.. oh and Achilles, I don’t hate ya bro.
Today I heard something interesting. They interviewed the sportsbook manager from west gate. He said and I quote “best Sunday ever, we haven’t had a Sunday this good in many years”
This same bozo said that a couple weeks ago claiming books had a great week... now I recall seeing that sport books don’t make as much money as table games and slot machines... this is incredible that sports books are cleaning up.. I do know these oddsmakers are truly brilliant people with lots of information(although they can’t cure cancer) and what not... but I’ve never seen double digit faves lose straight up in the same year week in and week out at this clip...something is definitely up... I think I’m going to sit out now as it’s just too volatile... GL gents.. oh and Achilles, I don’t hate ya bro.
Today I heard something interesting. They interviewed the sportsbook manager from west gate. He said and I quote “best Sunday ever, we haven’t had a Sunday this good in many years”
This same bozo said that a couple weeks ago claiming books had a great week... now I recall seeing that sport books don’t make as much money as table games and slot machines... this is incredible that sports books are cleaning up.. I do know these oddsmakers are truly brilliant people with lots of information(although they can’t cure cancer) and what not... but I’ve never seen double digit faves lose straight up in the same year week in and week out at this clip...something is definitely up... I think I’m going to sit out now as it’s just too volatile... GL gents.. oh and Achilles, I don’t hate ya bro.
Daytrader: you gotta let the tough loss go. These things happen. You will get em next time. Not concerned with your feelings towards Achilles, I just hope you are gonna be ok going forward!
Today I heard something interesting. They interviewed the sportsbook manager from west gate. He said and I quote “best Sunday ever, we haven’t had a Sunday this good in many years”
This same bozo said that a couple weeks ago claiming books had a great week... now I recall seeing that sport books don’t make as much money as table games and slot machines... this is incredible that sports books are cleaning up.. I do know these oddsmakers are truly brilliant people with lots of information(although they can’t cure cancer) and what not... but I’ve never seen double digit faves lose straight up in the same year week in and week out at this clip...something is definitely up... I think I’m going to sit out now as it’s just too volatile... GL gents.. oh and Achilles, I don’t hate ya bro.
Daytrader: you gotta let the tough loss go. These things happen. You will get em next time. Not concerned with your feelings towards Achilles, I just hope you are gonna be ok going forward!
Guys, if you go on line to review in slow motion you will see he WAS NOT out of bounds. I'm not sure why they didn't review it, however, maybe they did upstairs immediately and radioed down....You can look at the run on line in slow motion...
He wasn't Out of Bounds, and all scoring plays are reviewed and the Ref is signaled yea or nay.
Guys, if you go on line to review in slow motion you will see he WAS NOT out of bounds. I'm not sure why they didn't review it, however, maybe they did upstairs immediately and radioed down....You can look at the run on line in slow motion...
He wasn't Out of Bounds, and all scoring plays are reviewed and the Ref is signaled yea or nay.
Daytrader: you gotta let the tough loss go. These things happen. You will get em next time. Not concerned with your feelings towards Achilles, I just hope you are gonna be ok going forward!
LOL.. I’m ok bro .. I bought Tennessee in game at +190 and literally broke even. But thanks for your concern douche...
Daytrader: you gotta let the tough loss go. These things happen. You will get em next time. Not concerned with your feelings towards Achilles, I just hope you are gonna be ok going forward!
LOL.. I’m ok bro .. I bought Tennessee in game at +190 and literally broke even. But thanks for your concern douche...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.