what are your thoughts on the totals on these two game?
Bos @ Mil 199.5
Ind @ Was 200
i have a lean on these two totals but i don't want to say whay so it doesn't influence your judgement. just want to see what your take is on the outcome of these two totals.
what are your thoughts on the totals on these two game?
Bos @ Mil 199.5
Ind @ Was 200
i have a lean on these two totals but i don't want to say whay so it doesn't influence your judgement. just want to see what your take is on the outcome of these two totals.
phat imma have to disagree on the Bos@Mil game 199.5 it ain't happening son.. Boston plays Zone Defense better than any scrubs the bucks played in their last 5 gms..Cash Im liking the Under here pops //.
phat imma have to disagree on the Bos@Mil game 199.5 it ain't happening son.. Boston plays Zone Defense better than any scrubs the bucks played in their last 5 gms..Cash Im liking the Under here pops //.
phat imma have to disagree on the Bos@Mil game 199.5 it ain't happening son.. Boston plays Zone Defense better than any scrubs the bucks played in their last 5 gms..Cash Im liking the Under here pops //.
I also like the under. I was just saying lots of trends point to the over.
phat imma have to disagree on the Bos@Mil game 199.5 it ain't happening son.. Boston plays Zone Defense better than any scrubs the bucks played in their last 5 gms..Cash Im liking the Under here pops //.
I also like the under. I was just saying lots of trends point to the over.
I didn't actually run my numbers, but I did compare some of the major components.
Boston vs. Milwaukee - I have an issue with lines of 199 or 199.5; I personally feel like they're trying to sucker people in who think the two teams "only" have to get 200 points. Boston would be stupid to try and run Milwaukee up and down the court to keep up with the Bucks' pace. Boston still has pride on defense (ranked 9th PPG-wise on the road at just over 95). As far as Milwaukee, it's obvious they've picked their poison as a team - they're going for offense instead of defense; Milwaukee gives up two more points at home (99.8) than they even do on the road. IMO, Boston either controls this one, in which case both teams stay in the 90s point-wise or the Bucks run away with it and win something like 105-85. Both of these situations put the total at UNDER.
Indiana vs. Washington - Two-hundered is another one of those numbers that I really take offense (no pun intended) to. Only the opposite is true - they "only" have to score less than 200 points. I think people take Washington for a much better offense than they are scoring-wise. They may be efficient, that's fine, but after scoring 100+ this last game (108 at a TERRIBLE New Jersey team), they hadn't scored in triple-digits in the previous six games. In fact, the Wizards even have a four game trend towards the UNDERS. I don't have a feel for this game; if you're leaning towards the OVERS, just make sure you're sure Indiana will make up the scoring that Washington WON'T be doing, especially considering it's the first game back from a six game road trip (consistant let-down trend).
I didn't actually run my numbers, but I did compare some of the major components.
Boston vs. Milwaukee - I have an issue with lines of 199 or 199.5; I personally feel like they're trying to sucker people in who think the two teams "only" have to get 200 points. Boston would be stupid to try and run Milwaukee up and down the court to keep up with the Bucks' pace. Boston still has pride on defense (ranked 9th PPG-wise on the road at just over 95). As far as Milwaukee, it's obvious they've picked their poison as a team - they're going for offense instead of defense; Milwaukee gives up two more points at home (99.8) than they even do on the road. IMO, Boston either controls this one, in which case both teams stay in the 90s point-wise or the Bucks run away with it and win something like 105-85. Both of these situations put the total at UNDER.
Indiana vs. Washington - Two-hundered is another one of those numbers that I really take offense (no pun intended) to. Only the opposite is true - they "only" have to score less than 200 points. I think people take Washington for a much better offense than they are scoring-wise. They may be efficient, that's fine, but after scoring 100+ this last game (108 at a TERRIBLE New Jersey team), they hadn't scored in triple-digits in the previous six games. In fact, the Wizards even have a four game trend towards the UNDERS. I don't have a feel for this game; if you're leaning towards the OVERS, just make sure you're sure Indiana will make up the scoring that Washington WON'T be doing, especially considering it's the first game back from a six game road trip (consistant let-down trend).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.