so wizards +12 would be a play in that system
so wizards +12 would be a play in that system
perhaps some consideration should also be towards how many people place wagers on the matchup....in other words how many people must wager on a matchup before one side is deemed to be a a "public play"... 20 vs 80 people? 200 vs. 800 people? or even more 2000 vs. 8000 people? and therefore the 8000 on one side would be a creditable threshold to deemed as a public play.
perhaps some consideration should also be towards how many people place wagers on the matchup....in other words how many people must wager on a matchup before one side is deemed to be a a "public play"... 20 vs 80 people? 200 vs. 800 people? or even more 2000 vs. 8000 people? and therefore the 8000 on one side would be a creditable threshold to deemed as a public play.
so wizards +12 would be a play in that system
actually, all four away teams would be the correct play according to his system.
so wizards +12 would be a play in that system
actually, all four away teams would be the correct play according to his system.
perhaps some consideration should also be towards how many people place wagers on the matchup....in other words how many people must wager on a matchup before one side is deemed to be a a "public play"... 20 vs 80 people? 200 vs. 800 people? or even more 2000 vs. 8000 people? and therefore the 8000 on one side would be a creditable threshold to deemed as a public play.
perhaps some consideration should also be towards how many people place wagers on the matchup....in other words how many people must wager on a matchup before one side is deemed to be a a "public play"... 20 vs 80 people? 200 vs. 800 people? or even more 2000 vs. 8000 people? and therefore the 8000 on one side would be a creditable threshold to deemed as a public play.
actually, all four away teams would be the correct play according to his system.
actually, all four away teams would be the correct play according to his system.
covers consensus % is inaccurate.
according to the stats on sportsinsights (his link, not mine)
Hous is road dog with 44 %
OKC is home fav with 39%
did i understand his system wrong ?
covers consensus % is inaccurate.
according to the stats on sportsinsights (his link, not mine)
Hous is road dog with 44 %
OKC is home fav with 39%
did i understand his system wrong ?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.