definitely NOT all the time; but on a sunday ... its always good for a public
definitely NOT all the time; but on a sunday ... its always good for a public
actually that 2h did not make any sense... i watch the % and make decisions based on that, but calling those who bet on over "half brainless" and "squares" is not justifiable.
why are you so angry anyways?
actually that 2h did not make any sense... i watch the % and make decisions based on that, but calling those who bet on over "half brainless" and "squares" is not justifiable.
why are you so angry anyways?
who's else hands should it be in? yours?
who's else hands should it be in? yours?
Thank god for the fix!! LA/DAL Under 211
Thank god for the fix!! LA/DAL Under 211
The line didn't go up because more money was on the under regardless that more bettors were taking the over. So just because you see a high consensus on one side that doesn't mean there is more money on that side.
To make it easy to understand I'm gonna use small numbers here, say you had a 100 bettors taking the action on the o/u on a particular matchup. 75 of the bettors or 75% are on the over and only 25 or 25% are on the under, the total amount of dollars on the over amounted to 750 bucks while the total amount of dollars on the under amounted to 5,000 bucks. As you can see there is more dollars that the under bettors poured in and so because they want close to even action they are going to adjust the line even lower to get more money on the over action to get the gap closer between the money on the under and the over because if they succeed in doing that than they don't care what side wins because they will rake in the juice on the side that loses...capiche?
SJD just trying to help his fellow uninformed gamblers to see the light!
The line didn't go up because more money was on the under regardless that more bettors were taking the over. So just because you see a high consensus on one side that doesn't mean there is more money on that side.
To make it easy to understand I'm gonna use small numbers here, say you had a 100 bettors taking the action on the o/u on a particular matchup. 75 of the bettors or 75% are on the over and only 25 or 25% are on the under, the total amount of dollars on the over amounted to 750 bucks while the total amount of dollars on the under amounted to 5,000 bucks. As you can see there is more dollars that the under bettors poured in and so because they want close to even action they are going to adjust the line even lower to get more money on the over action to get the gap closer between the money on the under and the over because if they succeed in doing that than they don't care what side wins because they will rake in the juice on the side that loses...capiche?
SJD just trying to help his fellow uninformed gamblers to see the light!
What there is no fixing of unders? Cmon masta if you believe they can fix the ova they surely can fix the unda...lol All they have to do is not call as many fouls and make the game move along faster and they also could call more fouls in which a terrible known foul shooter will be at the charity stripes. They could also call quick early fouls on good shooters so they could sit for a while. So I guess with your belief you will never cry fix when there is a unda eh?...lol
What there is no fixing of unders? Cmon masta if you believe they can fix the ova they surely can fix the unda...lol All they have to do is not call as many fouls and make the game move along faster and they also could call more fouls in which a terrible known foul shooter will be at the charity stripes. They could also call quick early fouls on good shooters so they could sit for a while. So I guess with your belief you will never cry fix when there is a unda eh?...lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.