5 U DETROIT -5
5 U CHARLOTTE +1
10 U INDIANA -6½ (10 UNIT PLAY!!)
4 U IND -6½ & OVER 211
4 U BOSTON -11
10 U GOLDEN ST +5½ (10 UNIT PLAY!!)
6 U UTAH -9
i completely understand your points, but DALLAS has had a tough time with better teams... let alone GOLDEN ST for the last couple years..
94-90 is fine with me.
i completely understand your points, but DALLAS has had a tough time with better teams... let alone GOLDEN ST for the last couple years..
94-90 is fine with me.
thanks push... hope you have a great year as well.
as far as the HORNETS, plenty of people will jump on the line and i too can come up with 50 reasons why it would be a good wager... but it is fishy as hell considering the injuries to the CLIPS as well as their recent play.
HORNETS have been hot except their last game... and CLIPS have been horrible except their last game.
i certainly have a lean to the HORNETS, but think that something is up here and even there's a consideration for a play in this game, it would be the UNDER imo.
thanks push... hope you have a great year as well.
as far as the HORNETS, plenty of people will jump on the line and i too can come up with 50 reasons why it would be a good wager... but it is fishy as hell considering the injuries to the CLIPS as well as their recent play.
HORNETS have been hot except their last game... and CLIPS have been horrible except their last game.
i certainly have a lean to the HORNETS, but think that something is up here and even there's a consideration for a play in this game, it would be the UNDER imo.
u really thinkin that looks too good man?? I feel like thats a decent line for this game since NJ has started to play mcglore more and thats given them more of an inside presence (somthing I thought they should have done all year... not a big on the nets so i dont know if that was because of injury or what) - also i've been away from nba for a bit... I thought mcglore was seeing more time, can anyone confirm or deny this???? I think with him in there 6.5 is a rather high line when carter, kidd, and jefferson dont have to worry about boards as much..
u really thinkin that looks too good man?? I feel like thats a decent line for this game since NJ has started to play mcglore more and thats given them more of an inside presence (somthing I thought they should have done all year... not a big on the nets so i dont know if that was because of injury or what) - also i've been away from nba for a bit... I thought mcglore was seeing more time, can anyone confirm or deny this???? I think with him in there 6.5 is a rather high line when carter, kidd, and jefferson dont have to worry about boards as much..
i'm sure you could make an argument for a trap, but NEW JERSEY has actually played some good games recently and ORLANDO has not been as impressive as they were earlier in the season, so the line is about square IMO...
ORLANDO hasn't seemed to do as well now that they are on the radar and favored in a majority of their games now.
although i like ORLANDO tonight, i just don't know which NEW JERSEY team will show up and for the matter which VC will show up. these inconsistent bastards are almost impossible to cap.
the 100 million dollar man for ORLANDO hasn't played too well recently either (not sure if it's because of the neck stiffness he was suffering), but ORLANDO would be in serious trouble if they didn't have turk playing so well.
BOL with whatever you play.
i'm sure you could make an argument for a trap, but NEW JERSEY has actually played some good games recently and ORLANDO has not been as impressive as they were earlier in the season, so the line is about square IMO...
ORLANDO hasn't seemed to do as well now that they are on the radar and favored in a majority of their games now.
although i like ORLANDO tonight, i just don't know which NEW JERSEY team will show up and for the matter which VC will show up. these inconsistent bastards are almost impossible to cap.
the 100 million dollar man for ORLANDO hasn't played too well recently either (not sure if it's because of the neck stiffness he was suffering), but ORLANDO would be in serious trouble if they didn't have turk playing so well.
BOL with whatever you play.
u really thinkin that looks too good man?? I feel like thats a decent line for this game since NJ has started to play mcglore more and thats given them more of an inside presence (somthing I thought they should have done all year... not a big on the nets so i dont know if that was because of injury or what) - also i've been away from nba for a bit... I thought mcglore was seeing more time, can anyone confirm or deny this???? I think with him in there 6.5 is a rather high line when carter, kidd, and jefferson dont have to worry about boards as much..
magloire is garbage....
sorry Tridge, but i just had to throw that out there... NETS were better off with Mikki Moore in the paint... magloire has played sporadically, but hasn't made an impact on any games.
u really thinkin that looks too good man?? I feel like thats a decent line for this game since NJ has started to play mcglore more and thats given them more of an inside presence (somthing I thought they should have done all year... not a big on the nets so i dont know if that was because of injury or what) - also i've been away from nba for a bit... I thought mcglore was seeing more time, can anyone confirm or deny this???? I think with him in there 6.5 is a rather high line when carter, kidd, and jefferson dont have to worry about boards as much..
magloire is garbage....
sorry Tridge, but i just had to throw that out there... NETS were better off with Mikki Moore in the paint... magloire has played sporadically, but hasn't made an impact on any games.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.