We go to the well one more time, Magic have covered 2 straight over Hawks with 70% of public on them and it's 90% tonight, over 70% on a 7-1 run, can the Magic do it again ????
I'll count on the public being wrong as unlikely as it might seem, sometimes things just have a way of working out .......................
Hawks +7 (-120) over Magic --- 3.6 units to win 3 units
We go to the well one more time, Magic have covered 2 straight over Hawks with 70% of public on them and it's 90% tonight, over 70% on a 7-1 run, can the Magic do it again ????
I'll count on the public being wrong as unlikely as it might seem, sometimes things just have a way of working out .......................
Hawks +7 (-120) over Magic --- 3.6 units to win 3 units
We go to the well one more time, Magic have covered 2 straight over Hawks with 70% of public on them and it's 90% tonight, over 70% on a 7-1 run, can the Magic do it again ????
I'll count on the public being wrong as unlikely as it might seem, sometimes things just have a way of working out .......................
Hawks +7 (-120) over Magic --- 3.6 units to win 3 units
We go to the well one more time, Magic have covered 2 straight over Hawks with 70% of public on them and it's 90% tonight, over 70% on a 7-1 run, can the Magic do it again ????
I'll count on the public being wrong as unlikely as it might seem, sometimes things just have a way of working out .......................
Hawks +7 (-120) over Magic --- 3.6 units to win 3 units
u sir are an idiot...at least ur strategy is unique, no one on the forum has tried the look at percentages provided by the books and then bet against them....i am sure they are accurate, especially bc i am sure the books want to help u out
u sir are an idiot...at least ur strategy is unique, no one on the forum has tried the look at percentages provided by the books and then bet against them....i am sure they are accurate, especially bc i am sure the books want to help u out
Just curious as to how you were 2-0 last night when all of your listed plays from last night lost. Atlanta +7, Utah -3, and utah under. Thats 0-2-1. Not 2-0, but ok.
Just curious as to how you were 2-0 last night when all of your listed plays from last night lost. Atlanta +7, Utah -3, and utah under. Thats 0-2-1. Not 2-0, but ok.
I've looked up fading the public percentages over thousands of games and fading the public doesn't give u an advantage at all. When you have a sample of over 500 games the spreads come down to about 50% for both sides and totals. Fading the public can help you, but it's overrated. I think if you always fade the public you'll never win money long-term
I've looked up fading the public percentages over thousands of games and fading the public doesn't give u an advantage at all. When you have a sample of over 500 games the spreads come down to about 50% for both sides and totals. Fading the public can help you, but it's overrated. I think if you always fade the public you'll never win money long-term
I've looked up fading the public percentages over thousands of games and fading the public doesn't give u an advantage at all. When you have a sample of over 500 games the spreads come down to about 50% for both sides and totals. Fading the public can help you, but it's overrated. I think if you always fade the public you'll never win money long-term
well, in defense of theclaw... if you checked his earlier threads, he isn't just fading the public all the time... he waits until the public are on a roll, and then fades them... and when the public is getting killed, he picks spots to back them...
he is really fading the streak...
and he didn't say he went 2-0 last night... he said the public went 2-0 last night... he faded them, and therefore went 0-2...
I've looked up fading the public percentages over thousands of games and fading the public doesn't give u an advantage at all. When you have a sample of over 500 games the spreads come down to about 50% for both sides and totals. Fading the public can help you, but it's overrated. I think if you always fade the public you'll never win money long-term
well, in defense of theclaw... if you checked his earlier threads, he isn't just fading the public all the time... he waits until the public are on a roll, and then fades them... and when the public is getting killed, he picks spots to back them...
he is really fading the streak...
and he didn't say he went 2-0 last night... he said the public went 2-0 last night... he faded them, and therefore went 0-2...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.