Ran some calculations on my fav match-ups already and just finished, the result is 2 Hammer Plays....Lets get it....Hammer plays stand at 9-3 on the year.....
Jazz -2.5....HAMMER PLAY...SA has got way too many distractions right now to win their 5th game on the road this year.....My PRE has Jazz covering ATS by 8-10 points and at a 71% clip, reverse dog is 61.3%.....Hammer Time folks
Lakers -9.5...HAMMER PLAY...If their is one thing I have learned about this team is they don't like to be embarrased at home.....and Minn embarrassed them....Minn could have won that game at Staples Center on 11/09/10.....Look for the Lakers to blow this team out of the water and show them they dont like to be fucked with on their home court.....Pay backs are a bitch.....Lakers 75% PRE to cover ATS and 67% reverse dog.....Hammer it
OKC + 6.5.......This line is off by 2 points at least.......I see a 2-4 point victory here by Boston according to my numbers....Get on it
Thats all I ran for now......Most other games PRE% are not in the range I am comfortable wagering on....However things may change by Friday afternoon so stay tuned sports fans
Ran some calculations on my fav match-ups already and just finished, the result is 2 Hammer Plays....Lets get it....Hammer plays stand at 9-3 on the year.....
Jazz -2.5....HAMMER PLAY...SA has got way too many distractions right now to win their 5th game on the road this year.....My PRE has Jazz covering ATS by 8-10 points and at a 71% clip, reverse dog is 61.3%.....Hammer Time folks
Lakers -9.5...HAMMER PLAY...If their is one thing I have learned about this team is they don't like to be embarrased at home.....and Minn embarrassed them....Minn could have won that game at Staples Center on 11/09/10.....Look for the Lakers to blow this team out of the water and show them they dont like to be fucked with on their home court.....Pay backs are a bitch.....Lakers 75% PRE to cover ATS and 67% reverse dog.....Hammer it
OKC + 6.5.......This line is off by 2 points at least.......I see a 2-4 point victory here by Boston according to my numbers....Get on it
Thats all I ran for now......Most other games PRE% are not in the range I am comfortable wagering on....However things may change by Friday afternoon so stay tuned sports fans
tell me what you think of the bulls matchup too please
I ran that game first because I like the way Dallas has been playing.....PRE was 60% in favor of the Bulls covering ATS.....I added a new calculation to this one because of the erratic play of the Bulls offense.....If the Bulls were more consistant on Offense this may have been a ML play on the Bulls.....but no bet
tell me what you think of the bulls matchup too please
I ran that game first because I like the way Dallas has been playing.....PRE was 60% in favor of the Bulls covering ATS.....I added a new calculation to this one because of the erratic play of the Bulls offense.....If the Bulls were more consistant on Offense this may have been a ML play on the Bulls.....but no bet
Dallas was one i was looking at too but after seeing dallas lose it in the second half to NO Hornets other day it worries me that the just as erratic as the Bulls i think i will take your Jazz play San Annie wasn't that good vs the Bulls and they Jazz will make em pay
Dallas was one i was looking at too but after seeing dallas lose it in the second half to NO Hornets other day it worries me that the just as erratic as the Bulls i think i will take your Jazz play San Annie wasn't that good vs the Bulls and they Jazz will make em pay
first off, just want to say good job this season. always looking at your plays before pulling the trigger on my own plays.
that said, did you factor in sloan being out for the utah jazz? i can't see this as a blowout game and if it comes down to a couple of possessions, the spurs will definitely come out on top with the pop's coaching. read somewhere that millsap also has the flu although he is probable to play in tonight's game. spurs + points and ML seem like a good bet to me..
just wanna hear your thoughts to convince me otherwise. thanks!
first off, just want to say good job this season. always looking at your plays before pulling the trigger on my own plays.
that said, did you factor in sloan being out for the utah jazz? i can't see this as a blowout game and if it comes down to a couple of possessions, the spurs will definitely come out on top with the pop's coaching. read somewhere that millsap also has the flu although he is probable to play in tonight's game. spurs + points and ML seem like a good bet to me..
just wanna hear your thoughts to convince me otherwise. thanks!
first off, just want to say good job this season. always looking at your plays before pulling the trigger on my own plays.
that said, did you factor in sloan being out for the utah jazz? i can't see this as a blowout game and if it comes down to a couple of possessions, the spurs will definitely come out on top with the pop's coaching. read somewhere that millsap also has the flu although he is probable to play in tonight's game. spurs + points and ML seem like a good bet to me..
just wanna hear your thoughts to convince me otherwise. thanks!
I actually have no factor what so ever for a Head coach not being thier....the Assistant coaches know what to do....and these are grown men bro....they have been playing this game some of them before puberty hit....they know what to do in the absence of their head coach.....if anything it may even inspire them to play a little tighter......I like my numbers....and my Numbers say Jazz.....Thanks for the kind words as well bud
first off, just want to say good job this season. always looking at your plays before pulling the trigger on my own plays.
that said, did you factor in sloan being out for the utah jazz? i can't see this as a blowout game and if it comes down to a couple of possessions, the spurs will definitely come out on top with the pop's coaching. read somewhere that millsap also has the flu although he is probable to play in tonight's game. spurs + points and ML seem like a good bet to me..
just wanna hear your thoughts to convince me otherwise. thanks!
I actually have no factor what so ever for a Head coach not being thier....the Assistant coaches know what to do....and these are grown men bro....they have been playing this game some of them before puberty hit....they know what to do in the absence of their head coach.....if anything it may even inspire them to play a little tighter......I like my numbers....and my Numbers say Jazz.....Thanks for the kind words as well bud
JLB what was your PRE Rating for the Bucks game i find that like enticing??
PRE % is in favor of the 76'ers at 61% to cover the spread but lose.....this one will be a nail biter.....with Phil prob losing by 3 or less...that 0.5 point looks good right now....But this will be a no play for me.....this line is right on
JLB what was your PRE Rating for the Bucks game i find that like enticing??
PRE % is in favor of the 76'ers at 61% to cover the spread but lose.....this one will be a nail biter.....with Phil prob losing by 3 or less...that 0.5 point looks good right now....But this will be a no play for me.....this line is right on
I actually have no factor what so ever for a Head coach not being thier....the Assistant coaches know what to do....and these are grown men bro....they have been playing this game some of them before puberty hit....they know what to do in the absence of their head coach.....if anything it may even inspire them to play a little tighter......I like my numbers....and my Numbers say Jazz.....Thanks for the kind words as well bud
thanks for the reply bro
just checked stats and the jazz swept the spurs last season while the spurs swept the jazz 2 seasons ago. hard game to cap for me so i'll leave it alone. good luck man
I actually have no factor what so ever for a Head coach not being thier....the Assistant coaches know what to do....and these are grown men bro....they have been playing this game some of them before puberty hit....they know what to do in the absence of their head coach.....if anything it may even inspire them to play a little tighter......I like my numbers....and my Numbers say Jazz.....Thanks for the kind words as well bud
thanks for the reply bro
just checked stats and the jazz swept the spurs last season while the spurs swept the jazz 2 seasons ago. hard game to cap for me so i'll leave it alone. good luck man
Hi, JIB: Totally agree with your Jazz and Lakers picks, in fact, already had small wagers on them and waiting for your confirmation. I also had another wager -- Golden State Warriors -3.5 which I like. Could you kindly tell me whether that pick is also in line with your PRE rating? or do you lean the opposite (if you have to choose one). Thanks bro, and as always, BOL tomorrow. Cheers
Hi, JIB: Totally agree with your Jazz and Lakers picks, in fact, already had small wagers on them and waiting for your confirmation. I also had another wager -- Golden State Warriors -3.5 which I like. Could you kindly tell me whether that pick is also in line with your PRE rating? or do you lean the opposite (if you have to choose one). Thanks bro, and as always, BOL tomorrow. Cheers
first off, just want to say good job this season. always looking at your plays before pulling the trigger on my own plays.
that said, did you factor in sloan being out for the utah jazz? i can't see this as a blowout game and if it comes down to a couple of possessions, the spurs will definitely come out on top with the pop's coaching. read somewhere that millsap also has the flu although he is probable to play in tonight's game. spurs + points and ML seem like a good bet to me..
just wanna hear your thoughts to convince me otherwise. thanks!
first off, just want to say good job this season. always looking at your plays before pulling the trigger on my own plays.
that said, did you factor in sloan being out for the utah jazz? i can't see this as a blowout game and if it comes down to a couple of possessions, the spurs will definitely come out on top with the pop's coaching. read somewhere that millsap also has the flu although he is probable to play in tonight's game. spurs + points and ML seem like a good bet to me..
just wanna hear your thoughts to convince me otherwise. thanks!
Agree, I tell you tom that the Spurs is the right play. Revenge factor, Sloan being out, and the Spurs are gunning for their best start record of all-time. I tell you, Spurs or no play.
Agree, I tell you tom that the Spurs is the right play. Revenge factor, Sloan being out, and the Spurs are gunning for their best start record of all-time. I tell you, Spurs or no play.
or actually anyone in here....tv games are either your on the right side or...not
Fix on the Blazers? LOL c'mon give them some credit, they played their asses off. It's not their fault Denver is completely overrated and loves laying eggs.
With that said TV games do see to always live up to the hype of really good games down the stretch. Even Texas/ Illinois seemed a bit shady... Texas would keep pulling away then Illinois is right back in it right when you want to change the channel. The under in that game should have hit then of course here comes over time, where Texas pulls away again. It really makes you think something has to be fixed for the benefit of tv ratings.
or actually anyone in here....tv games are either your on the right side or...not
Fix on the Blazers? LOL c'mon give them some credit, they played their asses off. It's not their fault Denver is completely overrated and loves laying eggs.
With that said TV games do see to always live up to the hype of really good games down the stretch. Even Texas/ Illinois seemed a bit shady... Texas would keep pulling away then Illinois is right back in it right when you want to change the channel. The under in that game should have hit then of course here comes over time, where Texas pulls away again. It really makes you think something has to be fixed for the benefit of tv ratings.
Lakers -9.5...HAMMER PLAY...If their is one thing I have learned about this team is they don't like to be embarrased at home.....and Minn embarrassed them....Minn could have won that game at Staples Center on 11/09/10.....Look for the Lakers to blow this team out of the water and show them they dont like to be fucked with on their home court.....Pay backs are a bitch.
Huh? I don't see a revenge mentality here for LA. I could see it if the Wolves had pulled off the shocker in LA, of course, but why would the Lakers be pissed off at a lottery team for playing them tough and coming up short? The Lakers are too arrogant to give most teams credit for giving them a game, and that 99-94 win over the Wolves was no exception. Phil Jackson and his players went on and on about all of their mistakes that resulted from a lack of focus and execution. I'm not sure one player or coach said a word about Minnesota simply playing well.
Now there is a good chance that that November 9th game, along with the strong games the Wolves have played since, has gotten the Lakers' attention. Surely they'll take this Minnesota team more seriously tonight than they did in Los Angeles ten days ago. But as for wanting to embarass them, I don't think so. I don't think it's any accident that the Lakers haven't covered a spread against the Wolves since Kurt Rambis became Minnesota's head coach. The Minnesota Timberwolves are the last team in the NBA the Lakers want to humiliate.
This Lakers -9.5 play could very well work out, but if it does, I think it will have everything to do with a newfound respect the Lakers have gained for the Wolves, and will have nothing to do with being angry at the Wolves for losing to them in LA by only 5 points.
Lakers -9.5...HAMMER PLAY...If their is one thing I have learned about this team is they don't like to be embarrased at home.....and Minn embarrassed them....Minn could have won that game at Staples Center on 11/09/10.....Look for the Lakers to blow this team out of the water and show them they dont like to be fucked with on their home court.....Pay backs are a bitch.
Huh? I don't see a revenge mentality here for LA. I could see it if the Wolves had pulled off the shocker in LA, of course, but why would the Lakers be pissed off at a lottery team for playing them tough and coming up short? The Lakers are too arrogant to give most teams credit for giving them a game, and that 99-94 win over the Wolves was no exception. Phil Jackson and his players went on and on about all of their mistakes that resulted from a lack of focus and execution. I'm not sure one player or coach said a word about Minnesota simply playing well.
Now there is a good chance that that November 9th game, along with the strong games the Wolves have played since, has gotten the Lakers' attention. Surely they'll take this Minnesota team more seriously tonight than they did in Los Angeles ten days ago. But as for wanting to embarass them, I don't think so. I don't think it's any accident that the Lakers haven't covered a spread against the Wolves since Kurt Rambis became Minnesota's head coach. The Minnesota Timberwolves are the last team in the NBA the Lakers want to humiliate.
This Lakers -9.5 play could very well work out, but if it does, I think it will have everything to do with a newfound respect the Lakers have gained for the Wolves, and will have nothing to do with being angry at the Wolves for losing to them in LA by only 5 points.
hey bro.. luv reading ur threads .. thanks for taking the time to post them and i really appreciate ur inputs on ALL sports!!! keep the books and win a lot of ... GL on ALL ur future plays
hey bro.. luv reading ur threads .. thanks for taking the time to post them and i really appreciate ur inputs on ALL sports!!! keep the books and win a lot of ... GL on ALL ur future plays
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.