At Hawthorne in Race 3, #4 AJ's Mountain (2-1) will definetely take some money seeing how he won his last race by 16 lengths over MC 15k company.
The reason I feel he is a suspect is in this race today, because he broke from the 10 post shot across to take the lead, was challenged alittle bit by the #11 but was able to slow down the pace through the second half, and then turn it back on in the stretch to win going away.
(I don't know how many people are firm believers in watching the gallop outs but I tend to pay attention to them.)
In the gallop out Aj's mountain wasn't even half way around the turn when he was being passed up by rivals HE JUST BEAT BY 16 LENGTHS! In my opinion thats a sign A) he was exhausted from giving such a big effort, or B) he really isn't as sharp as one would think.
Lets turn to #1 Clew Bay (7-2) he draws the rail which is winning @ 25%, Clew also drew the rail in his last outsing were he dueled in a slow pace and pulled away late to win by 4. We know he is sharp, but the two things that catch my eye are: Clew has the most experience on off tracks (3-0-1-2),( it rained last night in Chicago) and he has shown the ability to come off the pace, coming from 5th to 3rd, 5th to 2nd by nk, and 8th to 3rd, and all three of those situations were on off tracks!
After all that being said, I feel like Riggs will be smart enough to keep Clew behind the rest of the field who will be dueling for the lead, and hopefully he will make his move at the TOS.
At Hawthorne in Race 3, #4 AJ's Mountain (2-1) will definetely take some money seeing how he won his last race by 16 lengths over MC 15k company.
The reason I feel he is a suspect is in this race today, because he broke from the 10 post shot across to take the lead, was challenged alittle bit by the #11 but was able to slow down the pace through the second half, and then turn it back on in the stretch to win going away.
(I don't know how many people are firm believers in watching the gallop outs but I tend to pay attention to them.)
In the gallop out Aj's mountain wasn't even half way around the turn when he was being passed up by rivals HE JUST BEAT BY 16 LENGTHS! In my opinion thats a sign A) he was exhausted from giving such a big effort, or B) he really isn't as sharp as one would think.
Lets turn to #1 Clew Bay (7-2) he draws the rail which is winning @ 25%, Clew also drew the rail in his last outsing were he dueled in a slow pace and pulled away late to win by 4. We know he is sharp, but the two things that catch my eye are: Clew has the most experience on off tracks (3-0-1-2),( it rained last night in Chicago) and he has shown the ability to come off the pace, coming from 5th to 3rd, 5th to 2nd by nk, and 8th to 3rd, and all three of those situations were on off tracks!
After all that being said, I feel like Riggs will be smart enough to keep Clew behind the rest of the field who will be dueling for the lead, and hopefully he will make his move at the TOS.
#5 Hart of a cowboy is 7-5 and he was one of the four that was dueling blocking, prairie breeze, he dueled 4 wide in a slow pace and faded bad. I don't think hes worth those odds.
#5 Hart of a cowboy is 7-5 and he was one of the four that was dueling blocking, prairie breeze, he dueled 4 wide in a slow pace and faded bad. I don't think hes worth those odds.
Looks like AJ proved me wrong! @ 1-2 though definetely not worth it.
Clew did everything I though he did and Riggs did everything I though he would, made a nice move on the turn but just couldn't get to the winner, a good 2nd though.
Looks like AJ proved me wrong! @ 1-2 though definetely not worth it.
Clew did everything I though he did and Riggs did everything I though he would, made a nice move on the turn but just couldn't get to the winner, a good 2nd though.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.