Have to like the Aggies chances here to at least get the cover. Utah St has done especially well as road dogs,when playing quality schools like BYU. Wk # 1's cover over Auburn is an example of that!
UTAH STATE + 7.5
Have to like the Aggies chances here to at least get the cover. Utah St has done especially well as road dogs,when playing quality schools like BYU. Wk # 1's cover over Auburn is an example of that!
UTAH STATE + 7.5
Have to like the Aggies chances here to at least get the cover. Utah St has done especially well as road dogs,when playing quality schools like BYU. Wk # 1's cover over Auburn is an example of that!
UTAH STATE + 7.5
Have to like the Aggies chances here to at least get the cover. Utah St has done especially well as road dogs,when playing quality schools like BYU. Wk # 1's cover over Auburn is an example of that!
UTAH STATE + 7.5
Have to like the Aggies chances here to at least get the cover. Utah St has done especially well as road dogs,when playing quality schools like BYU. Wk # 1's cover over Auburn is an example of that!
UTAH STATE + 7.5
has anyone forgotten that Utah St. SUCKS???
Byu isnt exactly a special team either...but why is it so hard for you people to recognize a trap line?? +7.5 looks so good right???
Byu wins this thing 28-10
has anyone forgotten that Utah St. SUCKS???
Byu isnt exactly a special team either...but why is it so hard for you people to recognize a trap line?? +7.5 looks so good right???
Byu wins this thing 28-10
JangoMD
You were right on yesterday's Pittsburgh winning by more than 10 points. Have a good ride on the person's back in the P.I.
Do you think BYU can cover the 7 1/2 points?
JangoMD
You were right on yesterday's Pittsburgh winning by more than 10 points. Have a good ride on the person's back in the P.I.
Do you think BYU can cover the 7 1/2 points?
Papadon, the side is a little tricky. I show the smart money played heavy State when line opened and are now playing BYU for the middle. There has been too much movement to pick a side this game and cap.
I told you above that this game should not go over 41 points but I feel like it will be a lot lower than that IMHO.
GL
Papadon, the side is a little tricky. I show the smart money played heavy State when line opened and are now playing BYU for the middle. There has been too much movement to pick a side this game and cap.
I told you above that this game should not go over 41 points but I feel like it will be a lot lower than that IMHO.
GL
I think the Auburn game was an abberation for UT St and they 'played up', while BYU has faced some steep competition; SEC team (Miss), Traditional power (Texas) and a bowl team (CFU).
That plus the advantage of being at home and having a roster that probably avg's 2-3 yrs older/mature player than UT St.....I like BYU -7.5.
I think the Auburn game was an abberation for UT St and they 'played up', while BYU has faced some steep competition; SEC team (Miss), Traditional power (Texas) and a bowl team (CFU).
That plus the advantage of being at home and having a roster that probably avg's 2-3 yrs older/mature player than UT St.....I like BYU -7.5.
Bankjob, now you gave away the fact that you are a TRUE ROOKIE. Parlays and Teasers have zero value buddy. Hence the name TEASER. You just lost the little respect I had for you as a capper. Your local must love you.
Your the guy yelling in a sportsbook holding up your $2 parlay 10 ticket and screaming the loudest at the TV. LOL.
Bankjob, now you gave away the fact that you are a TRUE ROOKIE. Parlays and Teasers have zero value buddy. Hence the name TEASER. You just lost the little respect I had for you as a capper. Your local must love you.
Your the guy yelling in a sportsbook holding up your $2 parlay 10 ticket and screaming the loudest at the TV. LOL.
I agree with you DAAKING. Utah St plays in the WAC and will be smacked by the top three teams in their conference. BYU played four tough games.
Made up my mind. BYU @ half, game & under
I agree with you DAAKING. Utah St plays in the WAC and will be smacked by the top three teams in their conference. BYU played four tough games.
Made up my mind. BYU @ half, game & under
2011-09-15 18:56:46.0 | WON: INTERNET: 3 Team 3T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 440 win 400 | WON: TOT UND 102 Mississippi St./Louisiana State under 59 (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 6-19 WON: 105 Iowa State +14 (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 24-20 WON: 101 Louisiana State +6½ (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 19-6 | 400.0 |
2011-09-15 18:56:46.0 | WON: INTERNET: 3 Team 3T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 440 win 400 | WON: TOT UND 102 Mississippi St./Louisiana State under 59 (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 6-19 WON: 105 Iowa State +14 (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 24-20 WON: 101 Louisiana State +6½ (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 19-6 | 400.0 |
2011-09-21 01:37:15.0 | WON: INTERNET: 3 Team 3T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 385 win 350 | WON: 304 BYU +7 (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 24-17 WON: 302 Cincinnati +2½ (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 44-14 WON: TOT OVR 301 NC State/Cincinnati over 49½ (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 14-44 | 350. |
2011-09-21 01:37:15.0 | WON: INTERNET: 3 Team 3T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 385 win 350 | WON: 304 BYU +7 (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 24-17 WON: 302 Cincinnati +2½ (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 44-14 WON: TOT OVR 301 NC State/Cincinnati over 49½ (NCAA FB) (10.0 pts) Score: 14-44 | 350. |
2011-09-23 19:40:44.0 | WON: INTERNET: 2 Team 2T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 275 win 250 | WON: 303 Central Florida +7½ (NCAA FB) (6.0 pts) Score: 17-24 WON: TOT OVR 303 Central Florida/BYU over 38 (NCAA FB) (6.0 pts) Score: 17-24 | 250.0 |
2011-09-23 19:40:44.0 | WON: INTERNET: 2 Team 2T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 275 win 250 | WON: 303 Central Florida +7½ (NCAA FB) (6.0 pts) Score: 17-24 WON: TOT OVR 303 Central Florida/BYU over 38 (NCAA FB) (6.0 pts) Score: 17-24 | 250.0 |
2011-09-26 17:01:04.0 | WON: INTERNET: 2 Team 2T 7PTS Teaser(ties no action) risk 520 win 400 | WON: TOT UND 426 Cowboys/Redskins under 51½ (NFL) (7.0 pts) Score: 18-16 WON: 425 Redskins +10 (NFL) (7.0 pts) Score: 16-18 | 400. |
2011-09-26 17:01:04.0 | WON: INTERNET: 2 Team 2T 7PTS Teaser(ties no action) risk 520 win 400 | WON: TOT UND 426 Cowboys/Redskins under 51½ (NFL) (7.0 pts) Score: 18-16 WON: 425 Redskins +10 (NFL) (7.0 pts) Score: 16-18 | 400. |
2011-09-19 20:15:40.0 | WON: INTERNET: 2 Team 2T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 495 win 450 | WON: 228 Giants -1 (NFL) (6.0 pts) Score: 28-16 WON: TOT UND 228 Giants/Rams under 49½ (NFL) (6.0 pts) Score: 28-16 | 450.0 |
2011-09-19 20:15:40.0 | WON: INTERNET: 2 Team 2T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 495 win 450 | WON: 228 Giants -1 (NFL) (6.0 pts) Score: 28-16 WON: TOT UND 228 Giants/Rams under 49½ (NFL) (6.0 pts) Score: 28-16 | 450.0 |
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.