The Terps have had a so so schedule, while BC has had to deal with 3 out of 4 "powerhouses" in the last 4 games. Statistically, last game was Maryland best. But their best effort came in week # 4 against West Virginia. THey lost by 10 but weren't run over. I can see Vegas' thinking because BC had to deal with the likes of Clemson,Florida St., & Georgia Tech. But statistically they have been in a freefall, unable to run and totally helpless to stop being run over. The one weak team they did have was Army, and even then, the Blacknights pushed them around. If you can't beat Army- you can't beat anyone. That clinched it for me. I upped the ante on this one!
The Terps have had a so so schedule, while BC has had to deal with 3 out of 4 "powerhouses" in the last 4 games. Statistically, last game was Maryland best. But their best effort came in week # 4 against West Virginia. THey lost by 10 but weren't run over. I can see Vegas' thinking because BC had to deal with the likes of Clemson,Florida St., & Georgia Tech. But statistically they have been in a freefall, unable to run and totally helpless to stop being run over. The one weak team they did have was Army, and even then, the Blacknights pushed them around. If you can't beat Army- you can't beat anyone. That clinched it for me. I upped the ante on this one!
Maryland's starting quarterback is out for the season, so that's why the line is low. Having said that, I think MD will bounce back big time with the heartbreaking loss they had last week
Maryland's starting quarterback is out for the season, so that's why the line is low. Having said that, I think MD will bounce back big time with the heartbreaking loss they had last week
All i know is that bc gave up 600 yards rushing to FUCKING ARMY. No way am i not taking maryland here regardless of whose starting at qb that bc defense is HORRID.
All i know is that bc gave up 600 yards rushing to FUCKING ARMY. No way am i not taking maryland here regardless of whose starting at qb that bc defense is HORRID.
BC -1 early "steam"!!!! hey fellas, i live in boston but like any decent gambler i dont take the BC eagles or the patriots because they are my home teams. BUT i did get an early "steam" pick from "vegas runner" on pregame.com...hes a pro handicapper nationally known, respected guy, an honest guy. i dont take all of his picks just cause he picked them but listen to his points & evaluate info on my own. he is a quantity/volume player i'm the exact opposite looking to get down on 4-7 college games a week & i bet on teams/players/physical mismatches/basically knowing teams offensive lines/run def/running QBs etc...vegas runner bets qauntity/many many games in all 4 major sports & bets for value or against the number no matter who is playing, he bets value not teams. he takes games that have a line that is 2 or 3 off from his power rankings that he evaluates b4 the sports books release a number. thats why ya can't just folow him blind, ya cant keep up with the volume that this type of pro capper gets down on. unfortunately this pick didnt have numbers backing it up or motivations (hense the "steam")some of us are not completely up to speed with all of the language but as i found out "early steam" as vegas runner called is basically "inside information" on one team or the other, it maybe an injury/start situation that obviously hasnt been made public, especially on monday or tuesday. it could be information on those variable situations like the QB for fresno state smoked meth with a hooker & got arrested during a raid on a shit motel in vegas the night b4 playing nevada. the staff bails out the QB & keeps it out of the new just long enough to play the game..."steam" could be anything.. this pick for BC came out monday -1 early steam....here are my 3 most played teams this year, playing sides or the o/u L-TECH - TEXAS A&M - ALABAMA....as u can imagine i crushed the L-tech vs A&M over 79 when they played 2 weeks ago. Alabama or the o/u in a bama game is 5-0 for me & remember whenever u need another team to help out in a teaser just take Alabama they are the most consistant & physically dominant team on the line in CFB. so thats the longest run on sentence in history. good luck fellas
BC -1 early "steam"!!!! hey fellas, i live in boston but like any decent gambler i dont take the BC eagles or the patriots because they are my home teams. BUT i did get an early "steam" pick from "vegas runner" on pregame.com...hes a pro handicapper nationally known, respected guy, an honest guy. i dont take all of his picks just cause he picked them but listen to his points & evaluate info on my own. he is a quantity/volume player i'm the exact opposite looking to get down on 4-7 college games a week & i bet on teams/players/physical mismatches/basically knowing teams offensive lines/run def/running QBs etc...vegas runner bets qauntity/many many games in all 4 major sports & bets for value or against the number no matter who is playing, he bets value not teams. he takes games that have a line that is 2 or 3 off from his power rankings that he evaluates b4 the sports books release a number. thats why ya can't just folow him blind, ya cant keep up with the volume that this type of pro capper gets down on. unfortunately this pick didnt have numbers backing it up or motivations (hense the "steam")some of us are not completely up to speed with all of the language but as i found out "early steam" as vegas runner called is basically "inside information" on one team or the other, it maybe an injury/start situation that obviously hasnt been made public, especially on monday or tuesday. it could be information on those variable situations like the QB for fresno state smoked meth with a hooker & got arrested during a raid on a shit motel in vegas the night b4 playing nevada. the staff bails out the QB & keeps it out of the new just long enough to play the game..."steam" could be anything.. this pick for BC came out monday -1 early steam....here are my 3 most played teams this year, playing sides or the o/u L-TECH - TEXAS A&M - ALABAMA....as u can imagine i crushed the L-tech vs A&M over 79 when they played 2 weeks ago. Alabama or the o/u in a bama game is 5-0 for me & remember whenever u need another team to help out in a teaser just take Alabama they are the most consistant & physically dominant team on the line in CFB. so thats the longest run on sentence in history. good luck fellas
Terp alumni/big fan here. Line is so low because the Terps are on their 4th qb. They managed to piece together a solid young team after Edsall disaster last year but lost starting qb Brown before season. Played some good ball with true freshman Hills (should be 5-2 w tough fought losses v uconn and w virginia) but lost him for the season last week v nc state (as well as game bc of horrendous kicker/factor that into the spread that the kicker is so bad you can't count on him for extra points). They also lost 3rd string wr converted to qb Burns for the season last week. That leaves them with 4th string/another true freshman Rowe. His backup is a LINEBACKER. So if he goes down Terps aren't scoring. That being said, Rowe isn't necessarily worse than Hills or Burns. It was very close at camp between the three but he's the only one with zero experience to this point. Terps have also played very well in all their road games. Assuming Rowe stays in the game and Craddock can actually hit his extra points and some chip shot fgs you would think Terps should still win against a terrible BC team. BUT lots of things can and have gone wrong for MD already in the young season so it may not be the gimme many are expecting. Also, gotta like the under despite pathetic BC def bc Terp D is solid and Edsall was extremely conservative w Hills his 1st week starting. Assuming he will play similar style to break in Rowe.
Terp alumni/big fan here. Line is so low because the Terps are on their 4th qb. They managed to piece together a solid young team after Edsall disaster last year but lost starting qb Brown before season. Played some good ball with true freshman Hills (should be 5-2 w tough fought losses v uconn and w virginia) but lost him for the season last week v nc state (as well as game bc of horrendous kicker/factor that into the spread that the kicker is so bad you can't count on him for extra points). They also lost 3rd string wr converted to qb Burns for the season last week. That leaves them with 4th string/another true freshman Rowe. His backup is a LINEBACKER. So if he goes down Terps aren't scoring. That being said, Rowe isn't necessarily worse than Hills or Burns. It was very close at camp between the three but he's the only one with zero experience to this point. Terps have also played very well in all their road games. Assuming Rowe stays in the game and Craddock can actually hit his extra points and some chip shot fgs you would think Terps should still win against a terrible BC team. BUT lots of things can and have gone wrong for MD already in the young season so it may not be the gimme many are expecting. Also, gotta like the under despite pathetic BC def bc Terp D is solid and Edsall was extremely conservative w Hills his 1st week starting. Assuming he will play similar style to break in Rowe.
Maryland just lost there third QB out for the season for a injury in practice. Hahaha, they move a Linebacker to QB yesterday, how much of the plays can he memorize lol. Boston College at large, sell your house and put your money on BC hahahaha
Maryland just lost there third QB out for the season for a injury in practice. Hahaha, they move a Linebacker to QB yesterday, how much of the plays can he memorize lol. Boston College at large, sell your house and put your money on BC hahahaha
I just read the article. They have a true freshmen who is going to start. He came in the game last week and lead them on their last drive. If MD wins this game it will be because of defense and special teams... I still think MD has better athletes on the field. Now i know why this spread was 1 point
I just read the article. They have a true freshmen who is going to start. He came in the game last week and lead them on their last drive. If MD wins this game it will be because of defense and special teams... I still think MD has better athletes on the field. Now i know why this spread was 1 point
Unlike some forum post I gathered some good info here was thinking Maryland but the line was an issue now i know why ...bol staying away from this one..
Unlike some forum post I gathered some good info here was thinking Maryland but the line was an issue now i know why ...bol staying away from this one..
Terp alumni/big fan here. Line is so low because the Terps are on their 4th qb. They managed to piece together a solid young team after Edsall disaster last year but lost starting qb Brown before season. Played some good ball with true freshman Hills (should be 5-2 w tough fought losses v uconn and w virginia) but lost him for the season last week v nc state (as well as game bc of horrendous kicker/factor that into the spread that the kicker is so bad you can't count on him for extra points). They also lost 3rd string wr converted to qb Burns for the season last week. That leaves them with 4th string/another true freshman Rowe. His backup is a LINEBACKER. So if he goes down Terps aren't scoring. That being said, Rowe isn't necessarily worse than Hills or Burns. It was very close at camp between the three but he's the only one with zero experience to this point. Terps have also played very well in all their road games. Assuming Rowe stays in the game and Craddock can actually hit his extra points and some chip shot fgs you would think Terps should still win against a terrible BC team. BUT lots of things can and have gone wrong for MD already in the young season so it may not be the gimme many are expecting. Also, gotta like the under despite pathetic BC def bc Terp D is solid and Edsall was extremely conservative w Hills his 1st week starting. Assuming he will play similar style to break in Rowe.
WHAT A GREAT PIECE OF INFO AND PRESENTED PERFECTLY
EDSALL GAME IS BALL CONTROL BEENTHAT WAY SINCE HE WAS COACHING UCONN AND IT HASNT CHANGED. HE WONT BE ASKING THE ROOK TO WIN THE GAME JUST MANAGE IT
EVEN IF ITS HIS LINEBACKER CALLING PLAYS THEY CAN STILL WIN STRAIGHT UP.
Terp alumni/big fan here. Line is so low because the Terps are on their 4th qb. They managed to piece together a solid young team after Edsall disaster last year but lost starting qb Brown before season. Played some good ball with true freshman Hills (should be 5-2 w tough fought losses v uconn and w virginia) but lost him for the season last week v nc state (as well as game bc of horrendous kicker/factor that into the spread that the kicker is so bad you can't count on him for extra points). They also lost 3rd string wr converted to qb Burns for the season last week. That leaves them with 4th string/another true freshman Rowe. His backup is a LINEBACKER. So if he goes down Terps aren't scoring. That being said, Rowe isn't necessarily worse than Hills or Burns. It was very close at camp between the three but he's the only one with zero experience to this point. Terps have also played very well in all their road games. Assuming Rowe stays in the game and Craddock can actually hit his extra points and some chip shot fgs you would think Terps should still win against a terrible BC team. BUT lots of things can and have gone wrong for MD already in the young season so it may not be the gimme many are expecting. Also, gotta like the under despite pathetic BC def bc Terp D is solid and Edsall was extremely conservative w Hills his 1st week starting. Assuming he will play similar style to break in Rowe.
WHAT A GREAT PIECE OF INFO AND PRESENTED PERFECTLY
EDSALL GAME IS BALL CONTROL BEENTHAT WAY SINCE HE WAS COACHING UCONN AND IT HASNT CHANGED. HE WONT BE ASKING THE ROOK TO WIN THE GAME JUST MANAGE IT
EVEN IF ITS HIS LINEBACKER CALLING PLAYS THEY CAN STILL WIN STRAIGHT UP.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.