Gonna throw out the card for the weekend upcoming. There are a TON of bad spots for bigtime teams in letdown situations this week. Time to put your balls on the line and go where no one else dares go.
Got a lot locked in already and am waiting on a couple others to settle down around key numbers before it's go time.
Good luck fellas.
Locked in...
Ga Tech -4 Central Michigan +14.5 (Mich State has ND on deck) Iowa St +7 Arkansas St +24 (Nebraska has VT on deck) West Virginia -6 (revenge) TCU -11 Houston +15
(letdown spot for Okie St after Georgia LW) USC -7 Marshall +19 (sandwich for VT...Bama and Nebraska) Wash St +1.5
Yet to play...
Minnesota -3.5 (first game in new stadium...line still falling) UNLV +7 (Oregon St awaiting showdown with Cincy on a short week following UNLV)
Gonna throw out the card for the weekend upcoming. There are a TON of bad spots for bigtime teams in letdown situations this week. Time to put your balls on the line and go where no one else dares go.
Got a lot locked in already and am waiting on a couple others to settle down around key numbers before it's go time.
Good luck fellas.
Locked in...
Ga Tech -4 Central Michigan +14.5 (Mich State has ND on deck) Iowa St +7 Arkansas St +24 (Nebraska has VT on deck) West Virginia -6 (revenge) TCU -11 Houston +15
(letdown spot for Okie St after Georgia LW) USC -7 Marshall +19 (sandwich for VT...Bama and Nebraska) Wash St +1.5
Yet to play...
Minnesota -3.5 (first game in new stadium...line still falling) UNLV +7 (Oregon St awaiting showdown with Cincy on a short week following UNLV)
Week #2 is traditionally a good week to take a peek for traditional winning programs in the role of DOGS...too much emphasis based on week 1 scores and usually a lot of value to be found. I don't particularly like Mich, OSU, or Clemson this week...but think those lines all offer value. Likewise S-Car. and UCLA. Again, don't get me wrong, I'm not endorsing a play on any of these at this time, but think the value is there. Tennessee laying 9 pts to UCLA because they blew-out W Kenty.!! Tennessee beat no-one last year...I guess that was all Fulmer's fault! Give me a break...
Week #2 is traditionally a good week to take a peek for traditional winning programs in the role of DOGS...too much emphasis based on week 1 scores and usually a lot of value to be found. I don't particularly like Mich, OSU, or Clemson this week...but think those lines all offer value. Likewise S-Car. and UCLA. Again, don't get me wrong, I'm not endorsing a play on any of these at this time, but think the value is there. Tennessee laying 9 pts to UCLA because they blew-out W Kenty.!! Tennessee beat no-one last year...I guess that was all Fulmer's fault! Give me a break...
Can you really consider VT in a sandwich situation when they haven't won a game yet? Maybe if they had won against Bama' the line would have been -24 and I could have seen your point. But I respectfully disagree IF that is your only reasoning for fading the better team with the best home field advantage in the country.
Can you really consider VT in a sandwich situation when they haven't won a game yet? Maybe if they had won against Bama' the line would have been -24 and I could have seen your point. But I respectfully disagree IF that is your only reasoning for fading the better team with the best home field advantage in the country.
Can you really consider VT in a sandwich situation when they haven't won a game yet? Maybe if they had won against Bama' the line would have been -24 and I could have seen your point. But I respectfully disagree IF that is your only reasoning for fading the better team with the best home field advantage in the country.
Yeah, this would have been juicier if Tech would have won, but they are going to be in "win and get out of dodge" mode. I don't understand the line movement here either. It's actually dropping so that signals a play for me for such an ugly road dog. The books are going to reel in a TON of Tech money, but not from me.
Can you really consider VT in a sandwich situation when they haven't won a game yet? Maybe if they had won against Bama' the line would have been -24 and I could have seen your point. But I respectfully disagree IF that is your only reasoning for fading the better team with the best home field advantage in the country.
Yeah, this would have been juicier if Tech would have won, but they are going to be in "win and get out of dodge" mode. I don't understand the line movement here either. It's actually dropping so that signals a play for me for such an ugly road dog. The books are going to reel in a TON of Tech money, but not from me.
Thanks Whodey. I just gotta find the right time to pull the trigger, the line seems to have leveled off for now. Don't want to see it dip below that 7, but I could see an additional hook or two if I wait it out.
Thanks Whodey. I just gotta find the right time to pull the trigger, the line seems to have leveled off for now. Don't want to see it dip below that 7, but I could see an additional hook or two if I wait it out.
Good luck Huggiebear. I can see why Clemson would be an interesting grab at this point...I'm just glad I got in on the ground floor with Tech in that one.
Nebraska seems to be popular around these parts. But that's ok by me.
Good luck Huggiebear. I can see why Clemson would be an interesting grab at this point...I'm just glad I got in on the ground floor with Tech in that one.
Nebraska seems to be popular around these parts. But that's ok by me.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.