YTD 9-1-2 (3 Pending)
Leaning:
Penn St.
Villanova (Big) Hope to catch the opening line before the GP kills it...
William & Mary
George Mason
UNC Wilmington
E. Michigan
W. Michigan
Temple
St. Joe's
Tennessee
YTD 9-1-2 (3 Pending)
Leaning:
Penn St.
Villanova (Big) Hope to catch the opening line before the GP kills it...
William & Mary
George Mason
UNC Wilmington
E. Michigan
W. Michigan
Temple
St. Joe's
Tennessee
YTD 9-1-2 (3 Pending)
Leaning:
Penn St.
Villanova (Big) Hope to catch the opening line before the GP kills it...
William & Mary
George Mason
UNC Wilmington
E. Michigan
W. Michigan
Temple
St. Joe's
Tennessee
big card....
that how they roll in Japan. Yokohama rocks.
gL
Definately won't have time to detail all of them.......
big card....
that how they roll in Japan. Yokohama rocks.
gL
Definately won't have time to detail all of them.......
Now 11-2-2 YTD
First up..
Tennessee -5
Why?
Vanderbilt looks like an really good Offensive team and they are but an 8 point difference in Season ppg and road ppg (79ppg – 71 ppg) shows they aren’t as swell on the road….Where as Tennessee is excellent at home.
On the road Vandy are averaging 71 ppg against teams allowing 68, not significant but efficient. Tennessee at home are allowing 63 ppg against teams averaging 72 (advantage Tennessee).
Tennessee at home is outscoring there opponents by 22 points (14 ppg better at home against conference teams). And there undefeated SU there. They are averaging 86 ppg/51% FGP at home agisnt teams allowing 68 ppg/42% while Vandy on the road is allowing 68.5 ppg/42.9% against teams averaging 71 ppg/43%. (Advantage Tennessee)
Tennessee is quite a faster team and this plays to there advantage as they are a little smaller as a team compared to Vandy and will use this speed to get an advantage on Vandy’s big guys.
Tennessee is 3-1 ATS against Vandy over the last 3 years.
Tennessee has a better bench and uses them more to give their starters adequate time to chug a Gatorade and get back out….Tennessee uses their bench for 42% of the minutes played while Vandy uses thiers for 32%. This comes into account when you have a fast paced team or your going against a fast pace team (Advantage, Tennessee).
Twice last year Tennessee beat Vandy, at home and away… to an average of 16 ppg. They have their number AND all of the starters form Tennessee in those games last year (except Tyler Smith) have returned and are set to play in this game…. Granted, Tyler smith scored 30 and 18 in those games, it was the play of the rest of the team that set him up. The team has done well in filling for him thus far…
I see Tennessee winning this at home by at least 8-10 points.
BOL
Now 11-2-2 YTD
First up..
Tennessee -5
Why?
Vanderbilt looks like an really good Offensive team and they are but an 8 point difference in Season ppg and road ppg (79ppg – 71 ppg) shows they aren’t as swell on the road….Where as Tennessee is excellent at home.
On the road Vandy are averaging 71 ppg against teams allowing 68, not significant but efficient. Tennessee at home are allowing 63 ppg against teams averaging 72 (advantage Tennessee).
Tennessee at home is outscoring there opponents by 22 points (14 ppg better at home against conference teams). And there undefeated SU there. They are averaging 86 ppg/51% FGP at home agisnt teams allowing 68 ppg/42% while Vandy on the road is allowing 68.5 ppg/42.9% against teams averaging 71 ppg/43%. (Advantage Tennessee)
Tennessee is quite a faster team and this plays to there advantage as they are a little smaller as a team compared to Vandy and will use this speed to get an advantage on Vandy’s big guys.
Tennessee is 3-1 ATS against Vandy over the last 3 years.
Tennessee has a better bench and uses them more to give their starters adequate time to chug a Gatorade and get back out….Tennessee uses their bench for 42% of the minutes played while Vandy uses thiers for 32%. This comes into account when you have a fast paced team or your going against a fast pace team (Advantage, Tennessee).
Twice last year Tennessee beat Vandy, at home and away… to an average of 16 ppg. They have their number AND all of the starters form Tennessee in those games last year (except Tyler Smith) have returned and are set to play in this game…. Granted, Tyler smith scored 30 and 18 in those games, it was the play of the rest of the team that set him up. The team has done well in filling for him thus far…
I see Tennessee winning this at home by at least 8-10 points.
BOL
Now 11-2-2 YTD
First up..
Tennessee -5
Why?
Vanderbilt looks like an really good Offensive team and they are but an 8 point difference in Season ppg and road ppg (79ppg – 71 ppg) shows they aren’t as swell on the road….Where as Tennessee is excellent at home.
On the road Vandy are averaging 71 ppg against teams allowing 68, not significant but efficient. Tennessee at home are allowing 63 ppg against teams averaging 72 (advantage Tennessee).
Tennessee at home is outscoring there opponents by 22 points (14 ppg better at home against conference teams). And there undefeated SU there. They are averaging 86 ppg/51% FGP at home agisnt teams allowing 68 ppg/42% while Vandy on the road is allowing 68.5 ppg/42.9% against teams averaging 71 ppg/43%. (Advantage Tennessee)
Tennessee is quite a faster team and this plays to there advantage as they are a little smaller as a team compared to Vandy and will use this speed to get an advantage on Vandy’s big guys.
Tennessee is 3-1 ATS against Vandy over the last 3 years.
Tennessee has a better bench and uses them more to give their starters adequate time to chug a Gatorade and get back out….Tennessee uses their bench for 42% of the minutes played while Vandy uses thiers for 32%. This comes into account when you have a fast paced team or your going against a fast pace team (Advantage, Tennessee).
Twice last year Tennessee beat Vandy, at home and away… to an average of 16 ppg. They have their number AND all of the starters form Tennessee in those games last year (except Tyler Smith) have returned and are set to play in this game…. Granted, Tyler smith scored 30 and 18 in those games, it was the play of the rest of the team that set him up. The team has done well in filling for him thus far…
I see Tennessee winning this at home by at least 8-10 points.
BOL
Correction----Tennessee -5.5
Now 11-2-2 YTD
First up..
Tennessee -5
Why?
Vanderbilt looks like an really good Offensive team and they are but an 8 point difference in Season ppg and road ppg (79ppg – 71 ppg) shows they aren’t as swell on the road….Where as Tennessee is excellent at home.
On the road Vandy are averaging 71 ppg against teams allowing 68, not significant but efficient. Tennessee at home are allowing 63 ppg against teams averaging 72 (advantage Tennessee).
Tennessee at home is outscoring there opponents by 22 points (14 ppg better at home against conference teams). And there undefeated SU there. They are averaging 86 ppg/51% FGP at home agisnt teams allowing 68 ppg/42% while Vandy on the road is allowing 68.5 ppg/42.9% against teams averaging 71 ppg/43%. (Advantage Tennessee)
Tennessee is quite a faster team and this plays to there advantage as they are a little smaller as a team compared to Vandy and will use this speed to get an advantage on Vandy’s big guys.
Tennessee is 3-1 ATS against Vandy over the last 3 years.
Tennessee has a better bench and uses them more to give their starters adequate time to chug a Gatorade and get back out….Tennessee uses their bench for 42% of the minutes played while Vandy uses thiers for 32%. This comes into account when you have a fast paced team or your going against a fast pace team (Advantage, Tennessee).
Twice last year Tennessee beat Vandy, at home and away… to an average of 16 ppg. They have their number AND all of the starters form Tennessee in those games last year (except Tyler Smith) have returned and are set to play in this game…. Granted, Tyler smith scored 30 and 18 in those games, it was the play of the rest of the team that set him up. The team has done well in filling for him thus far…
I see Tennessee winning this at home by at least 8-10 points.
BOL
Correction----Tennessee -5.5
Villanova -11
Why?
Notre Dame is horrible on the road, There season Average PPG is at a Great Looking 80.6 ppg but is sickly on the road at 64.8 ppg. Yet they own the 4th best offense in the country (pomeroy), but mostly at their own home. Big time Jeckyl and Hide syndrome here.
Villanova is the 3rd best offense in the country (pomeroy) and is averaging 87.6 ppg/49.3% FGP at home. Very good. Notre Dames road defense is allowing 67 ppg against teams averaging only 70 ppg. (GIGANTIC ADVANTAGE VILLANOVA).
Notre dame is again is averaging 64.8 ppg on the road (mostly due to Harongody/Abromaitis) against teams that are allowing 68 ppg. Again, pretty crazy with a #4 offense to be so crappy on the road. Villanova’s defense which is 85 places better than Notre Dames (pomeroy) is allowing 66 ppg against teams that are averaging 69 ppg.
Notre Dame’s strength is in there 2 pointers as they are making 51% of them. Villanova is allowing 43% of 2 pointers to their opponents. Hopefully, they have enough to slow down Harongody and Abromaitis in this category to keep them under control.
Villanova’s ATs trends are really good to include 14-3 ATS all games, 12-4 as a favorite, 6-1 in hoems games, 3-0 against teams that are averaging more than 77 ppg. and 9-3 ATS against teams with a wining record.
Basically what this boils down to is Notre Dame and Villanova being really good offensively but Notre Dame having an Achilles’ heel in that they have a poor defense and can’t play offense on the road.
Villanova Rolls
BOL
Villanova -11
Why?
Notre Dame is horrible on the road, There season Average PPG is at a Great Looking 80.6 ppg but is sickly on the road at 64.8 ppg. Yet they own the 4th best offense in the country (pomeroy), but mostly at their own home. Big time Jeckyl and Hide syndrome here.
Villanova is the 3rd best offense in the country (pomeroy) and is averaging 87.6 ppg/49.3% FGP at home. Very good. Notre Dames road defense is allowing 67 ppg against teams averaging only 70 ppg. (GIGANTIC ADVANTAGE VILLANOVA).
Notre dame is again is averaging 64.8 ppg on the road (mostly due to Harongody/Abromaitis) against teams that are allowing 68 ppg. Again, pretty crazy with a #4 offense to be so crappy on the road. Villanova’s defense which is 85 places better than Notre Dames (pomeroy) is allowing 66 ppg against teams that are averaging 69 ppg.
Notre Dame’s strength is in there 2 pointers as they are making 51% of them. Villanova is allowing 43% of 2 pointers to their opponents. Hopefully, they have enough to slow down Harongody and Abromaitis in this category to keep them under control.
Villanova’s ATs trends are really good to include 14-3 ATS all games, 12-4 as a favorite, 6-1 in hoems games, 3-0 against teams that are averaging more than 77 ppg. and 9-3 ATS against teams with a wining record.
Basically what this boils down to is Notre Dame and Villanova being really good offensively but Notre Dame having an Achilles’ heel in that they have a poor defense and can’t play offense on the road.
Villanova Rolls
BOL
Oklahoma St. -5.5
Why?
Oklahoma St. is 6-0 ATS as a favorite (23-6 over the last 3 years), 3-0 in home games, 8-4 in games against teams with a winning record, as 3.5-6 point favorite over the last 3 years, OK St. is 23-6 ATS. 10-0 at home straight up!
Texas A&M is 0-2 ATS off a win against a conference rival, 6-7 when playing against a team with a wining record (103 ATS against teams w/winning record after 15 games).
These teams have the 35th and 38th ranked defenses in the country (pomeroy) but it seems the defense for Texas A&M only shows up at Reed Arena (64.2 ppg allowed on the season, 72.9 ppg allowed on the road against teams averaging 72). No “Reed Rowdies” making some noise in OK St’s Gallagher-Iba Arena, which was voted the 5th hardest place to play an NCAAB game.
At home OK St. is scoring 80 ppg/47% fgp against teams allowing 69 ppg/42.5%. On the road Texas A&M is again allowing 72.9 ppg against teams averaging 72.
OK St. doesn’t turn the ball over as frequently as Texas A&M does (-3 difference), and OK St. is better at rebounding with a +5 difference at home (14-9). They’ll get the ball more and keep the ball more than Texas A&M.
James Anderson for OK St. is averaging 23 ppg this season and Marshall Moses is pulling down just about 10 rebounds a game (Moses is the 6th best in the nation in defensive rebounding% (pomeroy). Sloan for Texas A&M is their best scorer at 19 ppg.
OK ST. is a faster paced team. Not good for the larger Texas A&M team. Of there away games, all of the losses except to West Virginia came at the hands of a quicker paced team.
Texas A&M has played a slightly more difficult schedule, SLIGHTLY.
January 12th, Texas A&M gat slammed by Kansas St. at their arena, by 23 points. OK St. beat Kansas St. there last game on the road by 4. Another shared opponent was Oklahoma which Texas A&M beat at home by 3, while Kansas St. lost to Oklahoma on the road in overtime. (Advantage, OK St.)
I see this game being a little more separated than the spread has it. Texas A&M doesn’t play well away from home and OK St. pretty much takes care of business wherever they are.
BOL
Oklahoma St. -5.5
Why?
Oklahoma St. is 6-0 ATS as a favorite (23-6 over the last 3 years), 3-0 in home games, 8-4 in games against teams with a winning record, as 3.5-6 point favorite over the last 3 years, OK St. is 23-6 ATS. 10-0 at home straight up!
Texas A&M is 0-2 ATS off a win against a conference rival, 6-7 when playing against a team with a wining record (103 ATS against teams w/winning record after 15 games).
These teams have the 35th and 38th ranked defenses in the country (pomeroy) but it seems the defense for Texas A&M only shows up at Reed Arena (64.2 ppg allowed on the season, 72.9 ppg allowed on the road against teams averaging 72). No “Reed Rowdies” making some noise in OK St’s Gallagher-Iba Arena, which was voted the 5th hardest place to play an NCAAB game.
At home OK St. is scoring 80 ppg/47% fgp against teams allowing 69 ppg/42.5%. On the road Texas A&M is again allowing 72.9 ppg against teams averaging 72.
OK St. doesn’t turn the ball over as frequently as Texas A&M does (-3 difference), and OK St. is better at rebounding with a +5 difference at home (14-9). They’ll get the ball more and keep the ball more than Texas A&M.
James Anderson for OK St. is averaging 23 ppg this season and Marshall Moses is pulling down just about 10 rebounds a game (Moses is the 6th best in the nation in defensive rebounding% (pomeroy). Sloan for Texas A&M is their best scorer at 19 ppg.
OK ST. is a faster paced team. Not good for the larger Texas A&M team. Of there away games, all of the losses except to West Virginia came at the hands of a quicker paced team.
Texas A&M has played a slightly more difficult schedule, SLIGHTLY.
January 12th, Texas A&M gat slammed by Kansas St. at their arena, by 23 points. OK St. beat Kansas St. there last game on the road by 4. Another shared opponent was Oklahoma which Texas A&M beat at home by 3, while Kansas St. lost to Oklahoma on the road in overtime. (Advantage, OK St.)
I see this game being a little more separated than the spread has it. Texas A&M doesn’t play well away from home and OK St. pretty much takes care of business wherever they are.
BOL
Iowa +10.5
Why?
Another episode of Jeckyl and Hide. Ohio at home and away.
Ohio is scoring 75 ppg on the season against teams allowing 66.8, on the road though is a different story where they are averaging 65 ppg against the same 66.8 allowed by their opponents. This is a 10 ppg difference on the road than at home. Iowa is allowing 63.8 ppg at home against teams averaging 71. Advantage (Iowa)
Iowa at home is scoring almost exactly what there opponents allow them to (65.8 ppg against 65.3 allowed by opponents). Ohio St. is allowing 71.1 ppg on the road against teams averaging 69.9. Granted, Ohio St. away games were against the likes of Butler, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, West Virginia and Purdue, but they still lost all of them except the Purdue game by an average of 11 points.
Both of these teams have almost the exact overall strength of schedule (Ohio St. #44, Iowa #37), but what sticks to me is non-conference numbers.
Ohio St.’s SOS cnon-onference thus far is #257, while Iowa’s is #203. SO, theoretically, Iowa has played tougher opponents than has Ohio St. and there numbers PPG numbers are against as strong a schedule as Ohio St.’s.
Iowa should keep this closer than 10 points for most of the game.
Of the shots during a game, almost half of the shots Iowa takes are 3 point attempts. This is 4th in the nation. Accounting for 38.7% of their ppg (6th in the nation) There FGP for 3’s at home is 34.5% against teams allowing 32.2%. Ohio is allowing 42.6% 3-pt FGP on the road against teams that average 34.2. (Ohio St. is also #323 in the nation in defending against the 3-bomb). What this is all saying is that Evan Turner/Dallas Lauderdale’s block capability and play down under won’t have as much an impact if Iowa is throwing threes at a high percent.
Ohio St. has Minnesota on deck and that could be considered a revenge game as they lost to them in Minnesota Jan 9. It’ll be a home game after 2 road games. Possible “Let Down” game here? ‘Hope so.
Ohio St. is good, but there numbers are tricky, definitely not a road dominance. Iowa should play well enough and has a “bet-able” chance of covering this spread.
BOL
Iowa +10.5
Why?
Another episode of Jeckyl and Hide. Ohio at home and away.
Ohio is scoring 75 ppg on the season against teams allowing 66.8, on the road though is a different story where they are averaging 65 ppg against the same 66.8 allowed by their opponents. This is a 10 ppg difference on the road than at home. Iowa is allowing 63.8 ppg at home against teams averaging 71. Advantage (Iowa)
Iowa at home is scoring almost exactly what there opponents allow them to (65.8 ppg against 65.3 allowed by opponents). Ohio St. is allowing 71.1 ppg on the road against teams averaging 69.9. Granted, Ohio St. away games were against the likes of Butler, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, West Virginia and Purdue, but they still lost all of them except the Purdue game by an average of 11 points.
Both of these teams have almost the exact overall strength of schedule (Ohio St. #44, Iowa #37), but what sticks to me is non-conference numbers.
Ohio St.’s SOS cnon-onference thus far is #257, while Iowa’s is #203. SO, theoretically, Iowa has played tougher opponents than has Ohio St. and there numbers PPG numbers are against as strong a schedule as Ohio St.’s.
Iowa should keep this closer than 10 points for most of the game.
Of the shots during a game, almost half of the shots Iowa takes are 3 point attempts. This is 4th in the nation. Accounting for 38.7% of their ppg (6th in the nation) There FGP for 3’s at home is 34.5% against teams allowing 32.2%. Ohio is allowing 42.6% 3-pt FGP on the road against teams that average 34.2. (Ohio St. is also #323 in the nation in defending against the 3-bomb). What this is all saying is that Evan Turner/Dallas Lauderdale’s block capability and play down under won’t have as much an impact if Iowa is throwing threes at a high percent.
Ohio St. has Minnesota on deck and that could be considered a revenge game as they lost to them in Minnesota Jan 9. It’ll be a home game after 2 road games. Possible “Let Down” game here? ‘Hope so.
Ohio St. is good, but there numbers are tricky, definitely not a road dominance. Iowa should play well enough and has a “bet-able” chance of covering this spread.
BOL
Villanova -11
Why?
Notre Dame is horrible on the road, There season Average PPG is at a Great Looking 80.6 ppg but is sickly on the road at 64.8 ppg. Yet they own the 4th best offense in the country (pomeroy), but mostly at their own home. Big time Jeckyl and Hide syndrome here.
Villanova is the 3rd best offense in the country (pomeroy) and is averaging 87.6 ppg/49.3% FGP at home. Very good. Notre Dames road defense is allowing 67 ppg against teams averaging only 70 ppg. (GIGANTIC ADVANTAGE VILLANOVA).
Notre dame is again is averaging 64.8 ppg on the road (mostly due to Harongody/Abromaitis) against teams that are allowing 68 ppg. Again, pretty crazy with a #4 offense to be so crappy on the road. Villanova’s defense which is 85 places better than Notre Dames (pomeroy) is allowing 66 ppg against teams that are averaging 69 ppg.
Notre Dame’s strength is in there 2 pointers as they are making 51% of them. Villanova is allowing 43% of 2 pointers to their opponents. Hopefully, they have enough to slow down Harongody and Abromaitis in this category to keep them under control.
Villanova’s ATs trends are really good to include 14-3 ATS all games, 12-4 as a favorite, 6-1 in hoems games, 3-0 against teams that are averaging more than 77 ppg. and 9-3 ATS against teams with a wining record.
Basically what this boils down to is Notre Dame and Villanova being really good offensively but Notre Dame having an Achilles’ heel in that they have a poor defense and can’t play offense on the road.
Villanova Rolls
BOL
Taking this game under 167 as well.....
Villanova -11
Why?
Notre Dame is horrible on the road, There season Average PPG is at a Great Looking 80.6 ppg but is sickly on the road at 64.8 ppg. Yet they own the 4th best offense in the country (pomeroy), but mostly at their own home. Big time Jeckyl and Hide syndrome here.
Villanova is the 3rd best offense in the country (pomeroy) and is averaging 87.6 ppg/49.3% FGP at home. Very good. Notre Dames road defense is allowing 67 ppg against teams averaging only 70 ppg. (GIGANTIC ADVANTAGE VILLANOVA).
Notre dame is again is averaging 64.8 ppg on the road (mostly due to Harongody/Abromaitis) against teams that are allowing 68 ppg. Again, pretty crazy with a #4 offense to be so crappy on the road. Villanova’s defense which is 85 places better than Notre Dames (pomeroy) is allowing 66 ppg against teams that are averaging 69 ppg.
Notre Dame’s strength is in there 2 pointers as they are making 51% of them. Villanova is allowing 43% of 2 pointers to their opponents. Hopefully, they have enough to slow down Harongody and Abromaitis in this category to keep them under control.
Villanova’s ATs trends are really good to include 14-3 ATS all games, 12-4 as a favorite, 6-1 in hoems games, 3-0 against teams that are averaging more than 77 ppg. and 9-3 ATS against teams with a wining record.
Basically what this boils down to is Notre Dame and Villanova being really good offensively but Notre Dame having an Achilles’ heel in that they have a poor defense and can’t play offense on the road.
Villanova Rolls
BOL
Taking this game under 167 as well.....
No time for a huge write-up, but I like this one...
William & Mary -2.5 at JMU. JMU has a beet up team (lost three players in january already).
W&M better FGP, 3p% and FT %. 10-4 ATS, 7-2 ATS on the road. They shot 53% FGP against them last game.
W&M has better numbers against better teams..
BOL
No time for a huge write-up, but I like this one...
William & Mary -2.5 at JMU. JMU has a beet up team (lost three players in january already).
W&M better FGP, 3p% and FT %. 10-4 ATS, 7-2 ATS on the road. They shot 53% FGP against them last game.
W&M has better numbers against better teams..
BOL
Temple -1.5 at Charlotte,
I like that Temple defense on the road is better than it is at home. They adequately have held thier top 50 oponents (in scoring) to way less than they usually score. Except for thier game against Kansas. They have quality defensive games away at Rhode Island(#32), Seton Hall (#23), and Georgetown (#18). (Numbers in parenthesis are Offensive rank). Charlotte comes in at #49.
On the road Temple is holding opponents that usually score 70 ppg to 54 ppg. Charlotte at home is averaging 79 ppg against teams that allow 67.
Charlotte's offensive numbers are inflated due to playing home games mostly agianst some puch overs like Winston Salem, Grdner Webb, Mercer (all in which they scored more than 90)
Charlotte's Stength of schedule is 38 spots easier than Temples and thier non-conference is just about 100 spots easier than Temples. SO, these numbers are decieving.
When playing a good defensive Team Charlotte is 2-4 ATS. They are 5-6 ATS against winning temas.
Temple is outscoring there conference opponents by an average of 13 and on the road they are avergaing 9 point wins.
I like Temple here to easily cover the 1.5. They own this conference and are really good on the road.
BOL
Temple -1.5 at Charlotte,
I like that Temple defense on the road is better than it is at home. They adequately have held thier top 50 oponents (in scoring) to way less than they usually score. Except for thier game against Kansas. They have quality defensive games away at Rhode Island(#32), Seton Hall (#23), and Georgetown (#18). (Numbers in parenthesis are Offensive rank). Charlotte comes in at #49.
On the road Temple is holding opponents that usually score 70 ppg to 54 ppg. Charlotte at home is averaging 79 ppg against teams that allow 67.
Charlotte's offensive numbers are inflated due to playing home games mostly agianst some puch overs like Winston Salem, Grdner Webb, Mercer (all in which they scored more than 90)
Charlotte's Stength of schedule is 38 spots easier than Temples and thier non-conference is just about 100 spots easier than Temples. SO, these numbers are decieving.
When playing a good defensive Team Charlotte is 2-4 ATS. They are 5-6 ATS against winning temas.
Temple is outscoring there conference opponents by an average of 13 and on the road they are avergaing 9 point wins.
I like Temple here to easily cover the 1.5. They own this conference and are really good on the road.
BOL
Went with a gut instinct and 10 minutes of capping......
BYU +1
I know it's against the Unranked team at home favored against a ranked team, but BYU's numbers on the road being better than New Mexico's numbers at home just was so appealing....
We'll see
Went with a gut instinct and 10 minutes of capping......
BYU +1
I know it's against the Unranked team at home favored against a ranked team, but BYU's numbers on the road being better than New Mexico's numbers at home just was so appealing....
We'll see
Villanova -11 +3 Units
Villanova/Notre Dame Under 167 +1 Unit
OK St. +3 Units
Bill & Mary -1 Units
Temple -2 Units
Tennessee -2 Units
Iowa - Looking Good (3 Units)
BYU - To Be Determined (1 Unit)
3-3 So far (+1 Unit)......
Villanova -11 +3 Units
Villanova/Notre Dame Under 167 +1 Unit
OK St. +3 Units
Bill & Mary -1 Units
Temple -2 Units
Tennessee -2 Units
Iowa - Looking Good (3 Units)
BYU - To Be Determined (1 Unit)
3-3 So far (+1 Unit)......
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.