Buddy, highly recommend you check HF and o:division!=division and line<=-170. Been doing very well this season and previously. For me, home field/court is massive in any sport really and I am not really a fan of taking favs on the road because of this so I eliminated that from the query and just stuck with Home favs.
yeah I've looked into all the different scenarios. div and none div, different leagues etc. I just gave up trying to post anything intelligent on this thread long time ago. I see no point trying to help people out in the open forum anymore It's pointless and bunch of sheeps on here.
Buddy, highly recommend you check HF and o:division!=division and line<=-170. Been doing very well this season and previously. For me, home field/court is massive in any sport really and I am not really a fan of taking favs on the road because of this so I eliminated that from the query and just stuck with Home favs.
yeah I've looked into all the different scenarios. div and none div, different leagues etc. I just gave up trying to post anything intelligent on this thread long time ago. I see no point trying to help people out in the open forum anymore It's pointless and bunch of sheeps on here.
I have been gambling for26 years I have looked and used covers for years and other sites .I do not understand why on covers and some other sites where a guy posts a system or method and some people can not just read it and either use it or not use it . I for one have learned a lot over the years from a lot of very good gamblers.I also am new to betting on base ball .I can tell you I have won using this method since may 20th. every day what ever the highest money line is over minus 180 I take and I realize you are risking a lot.yesterday I put up $245 to win $100 with the Boston Red Sox and I won .I have seen so many really good people ran out of here that have a lot of knowledge to share
I have been gambling for26 years I have looked and used covers for years and other sites .I do not understand why on covers and some other sites where a guy posts a system or method and some people can not just read it and either use it or not use it . I for one have learned a lot over the years from a lot of very good gamblers.I also am new to betting on base ball .I can tell you I have won using this method since may 20th. every day what ever the highest money line is over minus 180 I take and I realize you are risking a lot.yesterday I put up $245 to win $100 with the Boston Red Sox and I won .I have seen so many really good people ran out of here that have a lot of knowledge to share
I would love to see the results for the ROI% on this system over the last few years if it was modified for only home teams and vs. non-divisional opponents as Aussie suggested.
I would love to see the results for the ROI% on this system over the last few years if it was modified for only home teams and vs. non-divisional opponents as Aussie suggested.
since 2013 to today.. home fav and non division larger than -170 Guys just let this die man. it's a lost cause You who know how to use it just bank on it. fuk everybody else who doesn't want to follow it. Its more money for you. less people do it the better for us.
since 2013 to today.. home fav and non division larger than -170 Guys just let this die man. it's a lost cause You who know how to use it just bank on it. fuk everybody else who doesn't want to follow it. Its more money for you. less people do it the better for us.
I have been gambling for26 years I have looked and used covers for years and other sites .I do not understand why on covers and some other sites where a guy posts a system or method and some people can not just read it and either use it or not use it . I for one have learned a lot over the years from a lot of very good gamblers.I also am new to betting on base ball .I can tell you I have won using this method since may 20th. every day what ever the highest money line is over minus 180 I take and I realize you are risking a lot.yesterday I put up $245 to win $100 with the Boston Red Sox and I won .I have seen so many really good people ran out of here that have a lot of knowledge to share
right there with you. what amazes me is everyone trying to either break down any system that someone chooses to use/share and discredit it somehow. just read what people post, do YOUR OWN analysis of it, and if you like it, use it. if not, move on down the road and if you truly think it's a losing system, then the OP will figure it out eventually with his wallet.
if you want to do historical analysis, do it on your own time if the OP didn't provide it. then come back and report if you want or don't. forums CAN be a good collective information resource (but you should always verify independently).
like you, i've been betting for a long time, but relatively new to baseball b/c i never had much luck in the past. i've picked up a few 'systems' here this season, and before implementing any of them, i applied them, kept good records, and tracked progress. THEN, i decided to deploy them with some pretty decent success so far. if they start to lose consistently, i am far enough ahead i can stop while i'm still in the black.
I have been gambling for26 years I have looked and used covers for years and other sites .I do not understand why on covers and some other sites where a guy posts a system or method and some people can not just read it and either use it or not use it . I for one have learned a lot over the years from a lot of very good gamblers.I also am new to betting on base ball .I can tell you I have won using this method since may 20th. every day what ever the highest money line is over minus 180 I take and I realize you are risking a lot.yesterday I put up $245 to win $100 with the Boston Red Sox and I won .I have seen so many really good people ran out of here that have a lot of knowledge to share
right there with you. what amazes me is everyone trying to either break down any system that someone chooses to use/share and discredit it somehow. just read what people post, do YOUR OWN analysis of it, and if you like it, use it. if not, move on down the road and if you truly think it's a losing system, then the OP will figure it out eventually with his wallet.
if you want to do historical analysis, do it on your own time if the OP didn't provide it. then come back and report if you want or don't. forums CAN be a good collective information resource (but you should always verify independently).
like you, i've been betting for a long time, but relatively new to baseball b/c i never had much luck in the past. i've picked up a few 'systems' here this season, and before implementing any of them, i applied them, kept good records, and tracked progress. THEN, i decided to deploy them with some pretty decent success so far. if they start to lose consistently, i am far enough ahead i can stop while i'm still in the black.
If the system is making money for the OP i dont see the issue. Everyone has there own comfort levels on how to bet. Take the info and analysis for your own needs.
If the system is making money for the OP i dont see the issue. Everyone has there own comfort levels on how to bet. Take the info and analysis for your own needs.
Extremist: thanks for posting those numbers. As I suspected, overall since 2014, just laying the heavy price on the money line is far better than attempting to bet the -1.5 run line.
As someone posted earlier in this thread, the books know that nobody wants to lay $200 or more to win $100. Therefore that is more likely the side with the edge. The books know that if they post a line of -240/+200, they'll almost certainly get more money on the dog anyway, so they don't need to go higher than that price, even if their own prediction models dictate a higher percent chance of the favorite winning.
The books also know that everyone loves to sell the -1.5 runs on favorites in order to minimize risk (either that or paylay the favorites). Therefore that has to be the wrong play over the long-term. It looks so tempting, so it has to be wrong.
Lastly, after years of trying to find dogs with value, it's actually refreshing to bet on the best teams vs the worst teams and to watch them usually coast with an easy win!
Extremist: thanks for posting those numbers. As I suspected, overall since 2014, just laying the heavy price on the money line is far better than attempting to bet the -1.5 run line.
As someone posted earlier in this thread, the books know that nobody wants to lay $200 or more to win $100. Therefore that is more likely the side with the edge. The books know that if they post a line of -240/+200, they'll almost certainly get more money on the dog anyway, so they don't need to go higher than that price, even if their own prediction models dictate a higher percent chance of the favorite winning.
The books also know that everyone loves to sell the -1.5 runs on favorites in order to minimize risk (either that or paylay the favorites). Therefore that has to be the wrong play over the long-term. It looks so tempting, so it has to be wrong.
Lastly, after years of trying to find dogs with value, it's actually refreshing to bet on the best teams vs the worst teams and to watch them usually coast with an easy win!
Also regardless if anyone else likes it or not or if you think its not a long term solution thats fine. Nothing is long term since the books adjust the minute they are at a disadvantage.
Having said that I dont see why there are people in here wishing for it to fail. Like Ex said its working now so why not just ride it?
Either way nothing is more annoying when someone makes a new account and starts posting like they know everything but All Ex did was offer what has been working for him. he wasnt a know it all jerk about it. take it or leave it.
@fadeordie...i seriously dont get the eating popcorn waiting to fail logic...do you have anything constructive to add to beat the book?
Also regardless if anyone else likes it or not or if you think its not a long term solution thats fine. Nothing is long term since the books adjust the minute they are at a disadvantage.
Having said that I dont see why there are people in here wishing for it to fail. Like Ex said its working now so why not just ride it?
Either way nothing is more annoying when someone makes a new account and starts posting like they know everything but All Ex did was offer what has been working for him. he wasnt a know it all jerk about it. take it or leave it.
@fadeordie...i seriously dont get the eating popcorn waiting to fail logic...do you have anything constructive to add to beat the book?
well you got the Jays today and they're no sure thing at home on Saturdays any more and the White Sox have momentum this week with nothing to lose.,,
I suggest you not just flat take the biggest plays because you've got Vegas tilting lines on public favs like this one or the Red Sox with Sale 2 days ago...consider teams struggling even if their Ace is pitching, look for moderate favs like -150 that are playing well currently like the Dodgers today...
well you got the Jays today and they're no sure thing at home on Saturdays any more and the White Sox have momentum this week with nothing to lose.,,
I suggest you not just flat take the biggest plays because you've got Vegas tilting lines on public favs like this one or the Red Sox with Sale 2 days ago...consider teams struggling even if their Ace is pitching, look for moderate favs like -150 that are playing well currently like the Dodgers today...
Well I guess you guys don't want to let this thread die since I have at least a couple of people everyday making stupid negative comments and at the same time with some positive encouraging words. So not sure how to take this. All I can tell you is that I'm playing my way and you play yours. I don't care what team is hot, what team is not. Im playing my play. For the dumb azz who just said "it lost the past 2 days": you must be looking for a system that wins 100% and I can't help you there bud. I told you this hits 75% or so through out the past 4 years. That means, if you look at the whole pictures, the whole season, 3 out of 4 will be the the ratio of winner to losers. Just like it has lost 3 in a row, I has also won 20 in a row, 6 in a row, 7 in a row.. etc.
For everyone who questions what I'm claiming, I'm posting the record for this for this season on google drive. You can look at it yourself. I have included the query that you can run on SDQL yourself or a friend that knows how to verify. Lines are not based on opening or closing, but more what the public has mostly bet on but I lean towards more to the closing line.That how SDQL does it. Example: Yesterday, I took Dodgers as the biggest favorite because in the morning in CA, Dodgers had the largest line but that changed throughout the day and by closing time Blue Jays were the largest favorite, Hence my bet won on the Dodges but the Blue Jays bet lost, which I didn't take. So my word of advice would be to check SDQL a few times a day and see what line are they considering to be the biggest bet. They had both lines the same for yesterday as you'll see on the Docs that I posted.
I have been and will continue to play the biggest favorite for each day as long as I can. Placing the money to win $1000 a day. Some days it's will be on all ML the other days I will split it to with the RL and ML to create the -1 RL like today. It does minimize if your lose but Also you will push some winning bets as well so it's a double edged sword. This is the way I want to play and you can do whatever you want with this info. Call it a streak, system or whatever you want,
Not here to boast or say your way is not good, I'm just doing what works for me so please dont come in here talking sht when I lose because I guarnatee you, I will have 10 days in a row where I will be doing the laughing and I don't have time to play games on here going back and forth like those other idiots in this thread.
It took me a while to be able to copy and past the stuff to google docs and to make it all fit but all the other years past 2012 have the same record. If there's an easier way to do it show me and i can post the other years as well but all you have to do it change the season on the query to the year you want and you can pull the same info as I did. Its very easy, go to killersports.com and click on MLB, then SDQL query page, and then just copy and past the query on there and you can see if for yourself.
Here's the link for the Doc with the query on top of the page:
now, on the subject of betting -180 and greater, that has been discussed greatly in this thread and you can flat bet play that for the whole year for smaller amounts and that's a great winner as well but for me right now since I'm playing a large amount everyday I'm going to just stick to largest fav for each day for now.
Some days I'll play to win $1000 and other times to play $2000 if I decide to chase it, just depends how much I'm up. Might even drop down to half of that, hopefully not. Good luck whether you decide to follow or fade but just don't criticize me because I don't tell you what to do with your money and I expect the same respect back from you.
Well I guess you guys don't want to let this thread die since I have at least a couple of people everyday making stupid negative comments and at the same time with some positive encouraging words. So not sure how to take this. All I can tell you is that I'm playing my way and you play yours. I don't care what team is hot, what team is not. Im playing my play. For the dumb azz who just said "it lost the past 2 days": you must be looking for a system that wins 100% and I can't help you there bud. I told you this hits 75% or so through out the past 4 years. That means, if you look at the whole pictures, the whole season, 3 out of 4 will be the the ratio of winner to losers. Just like it has lost 3 in a row, I has also won 20 in a row, 6 in a row, 7 in a row.. etc.
For everyone who questions what I'm claiming, I'm posting the record for this for this season on google drive. You can look at it yourself. I have included the query that you can run on SDQL yourself or a friend that knows how to verify. Lines are not based on opening or closing, but more what the public has mostly bet on but I lean towards more to the closing line.That how SDQL does it. Example: Yesterday, I took Dodgers as the biggest favorite because in the morning in CA, Dodgers had the largest line but that changed throughout the day and by closing time Blue Jays were the largest favorite, Hence my bet won on the Dodges but the Blue Jays bet lost, which I didn't take. So my word of advice would be to check SDQL a few times a day and see what line are they considering to be the biggest bet. They had both lines the same for yesterday as you'll see on the Docs that I posted.
I have been and will continue to play the biggest favorite for each day as long as I can. Placing the money to win $1000 a day. Some days it's will be on all ML the other days I will split it to with the RL and ML to create the -1 RL like today. It does minimize if your lose but Also you will push some winning bets as well so it's a double edged sword. This is the way I want to play and you can do whatever you want with this info. Call it a streak, system or whatever you want,
Not here to boast or say your way is not good, I'm just doing what works for me so please dont come in here talking sht when I lose because I guarnatee you, I will have 10 days in a row where I will be doing the laughing and I don't have time to play games on here going back and forth like those other idiots in this thread.
It took me a while to be able to copy and past the stuff to google docs and to make it all fit but all the other years past 2012 have the same record. If there's an easier way to do it show me and i can post the other years as well but all you have to do it change the season on the query to the year you want and you can pull the same info as I did. Its very easy, go to killersports.com and click on MLB, then SDQL query page, and then just copy and past the query on there and you can see if for yourself.
Here's the link for the Doc with the query on top of the page:
now, on the subject of betting -180 and greater, that has been discussed greatly in this thread and you can flat bet play that for the whole year for smaller amounts and that's a great winner as well but for me right now since I'm playing a large amount everyday I'm going to just stick to largest fav for each day for now.
Some days I'll play to win $1000 and other times to play $2000 if I decide to chase it, just depends how much I'm up. Might even drop down to half of that, hopefully not. Good luck whether you decide to follow or fade but just don't criticize me because I don't tell you what to do with your money and I expect the same respect back from you.
If it was that easy, everybody would be doing it and we would all be millionaires, by the way TO lost today, and guess what the NYY are losing currently as well, that is for the other system better, we know who that is. Good luck all in all, but again I bet small crumbs and watch the big fish.
If it was that easy, everybody would be doing it and we would all be millionaires, by the way TO lost today, and guess what the NYY are losing currently as well, that is for the other system better, we know who that is. Good luck all in all, but again I bet small crumbs and watch the big fish.
This is like the Blackjack system where u just keep chasing your bets u until you break even. We know how that works, eventually you betting a million bucks to win $10.
This is like the Blackjack system where u just keep chasing your bets u until you break even. We know how that works, eventually you betting a million bucks to win $10.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.