This started out as a flat betting discussion but the profits shown in post 1 were not from flat betting, they are for betting to win $100 on each bet. This approach has worked for 2014-2017. Here is what I show for each year, betting to win $100 per game, laying heavy juice. Total since 2004 is -$4,161
I've back tested 2 years with flat betting all games. 2017 you'd be at $1,462.37 by risking $100 per game and 2013 instead of losing $806 you would have lost $113.27.
The big question is can the big faves continue to win at such a high percentage? 2014-2017 has had a win% ranging from 70.1 to 77.8%. The other two winning seasons had win % of 69 and 69.7. The eight losing years were 64.6 to 67.9.
This started out as a flat betting discussion but the profits shown in post 1 were not from flat betting, they are for betting to win $100 on each bet. This approach has worked for 2014-2017. Here is what I show for each year, betting to win $100 per game, laying heavy juice. Total since 2004 is -$4,161
I've back tested 2 years with flat betting all games. 2017 you'd be at $1,462.37 by risking $100 per game and 2013 instead of losing $806 you would have lost $113.27.
The big question is can the big faves continue to win at such a high percentage? 2014-2017 has had a win% ranging from 70.1 to 77.8%. The other two winning seasons had win % of 69 and 69.7. The eight losing years were 64.6 to 67.9.
This started out as a flat betting discussion but the profits shown in post 1 were not from flat betting, they are for betting to win $100 on each bet. This approach has worked for 2014-2017. Here is what I show for each year, betting to win $100 per game, laying heavy juice. Total since 2004 is -$4,161
I've back tested 2 years with flat betting all games. 2017 you'd be at $1,462.37 by risking $100 per game and 2013 instead of losing $806 you would have lost $113.27.
The big question is can the big faves continue to win at such a high percentage? 2014-2017 has had a win% ranging from 70.1 to 77.8%. The other two winning seasons had win % of 69 and 69.7. The eight losing years were 64.6 to 67.9.
This started out as a flat betting discussion but the profits shown in post 1 were not from flat betting, they are for betting to win $100 on each bet. This approach has worked for 2014-2017. Here is what I show for each year, betting to win $100 per game, laying heavy juice. Total since 2004 is -$4,161
I've back tested 2 years with flat betting all games. 2017 you'd be at $1,462.37 by risking $100 per game and 2013 instead of losing $806 you would have lost $113.27.
The big question is can the big faves continue to win at such a high percentage? 2014-2017 has had a win% ranging from 70.1 to 77.8%. The other two winning seasons had win % of 69 and 69.7. The eight losing years were 64.6 to 67.9.
This started out as a flat betting discussion but the profits shown in post 1 were not from flat betting, they are for betting to win $100 on each bet. This approach has worked for 2014-2017. Here is what I show for each year, betting to win $100 per game, laying heavy juice. Total since 2004 is -$4,161
I've back tested 2 years with flat betting all games. 2017 you'd be at $1,462.37 by risking $100 per game and 2013 instead of losing $806 you would have lost $113.27.
The big question is can the big faves continue to win at such a high percentage? 2014-2017 has had a win% ranging from 70.1 to 77.8%. The other two winning seasons had win % of 69 and 69.7. The eight losing years were 64.6 to 67.9.
This started out as a flat betting discussion but the profits shown in post 1 were not from flat betting, they are for betting to win $100 on each bet. This approach has worked for 2014-2017. Here is what I show for each year, betting to win $100 per game, laying heavy juice. Total since 2004 is -$4,161
I've back tested 2 years with flat betting all games. 2017 you'd be at $1,462.37 by risking $100 per game and 2013 instead of losing $806 you would have lost $113.27.
The big question is can the big faves continue to win at such a high percentage? 2014-2017 has had a win% ranging from 70.1 to 77.8%. The other two winning seasons had win % of 69 and 69.7. The eight losing years were 64.6 to 67.9.
Just to be clear, I wasn't bashing you or this system in my posts. I'm a numbers guy and wanted to see for myself the numbers of as many years as possible and also compare flat betting vs laying juice or chasing. I'm trying to figure out what has changed in the game in the last few years that has bumped up the win % into the 70's and made this a winning play. Is there a bigger gap between good and bad teams because of payroll?
Just to be clear, I wasn't bashing you or this system in my posts. I'm a numbers guy and wanted to see for myself the numbers of as many years as possible and also compare flat betting vs laying juice or chasing. I'm trying to figure out what has changed in the game in the last few years that has bumped up the win % into the 70's and made this a winning play. Is there a bigger gap between good and bad teams because of payroll?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.