I hear a lot of people quoting numbers and offensive/defensive efficincy, etc trying to sound as though they are physicists.
That's fine, but just use logic and reasoning.
In the Nova/Hoyas game you need to adjust for the Georgetown dudes that are out. Academic ineligibility and a broken jaw result in this team not being the one that would put up a fight against Nova. They go from a Top 75 team to a Top 200 team by my number crunching.
Nova is not the 4th best team in the country as the rankings would suggest. I have them as Top 15.
I hear a lot of people quoting numbers and offensive/defensive efficincy, etc trying to sound as though they are physicists.
That's fine, but just use logic and reasoning.
In the Nova/Hoyas game you need to adjust for the Georgetown dudes that are out. Academic ineligibility and a broken jaw result in this team not being the one that would put up a fight against Nova. They go from a Top 75 team to a Top 200 team by my number crunching.
Nova is not the 4th best team in the country as the rankings would suggest. I have them as Top 15.
Well, i said I had them as 'Top 15'. And in order to validate my case I am making the argument of, worst case, you are looking at #15...
Most people here would make the Georgetown argument and then drink the Kool Aid on the team they are supporting and say 'they are #4 soon to be #1!!!'
Statistics in sports are like a lamppost to a drunk. They provide support, not illumination.
but here goes...in no particular order
Kansas, Arizona, Syracuse, Iowa, Pitt, Florida, Michigan State, Kentucky, Okie St, Creighton, Wichita State, Michigan, UCLA, and of course Duke if playing at home.
Well, i said I had them as 'Top 15'. And in order to validate my case I am making the argument of, worst case, you are looking at #15...
Most people here would make the Georgetown argument and then drink the Kool Aid on the team they are supporting and say 'they are #4 soon to be #1!!!'
Statistics in sports are like a lamppost to a drunk. They provide support, not illumination.
but here goes...in no particular order
Kansas, Arizona, Syracuse, Iowa, Pitt, Florida, Michigan State, Kentucky, Okie St, Creighton, Wichita State, Michigan, UCLA, and of course Duke if playing at home.
Finally someone who has info that actually is useful. I like you're top 15 and I'm wondering what you think of the Pitt- Duke matchup, I cant understand all the love for Duke, I have Pitt winning by 8-12 pts, so Pitt covering 4pts seems safe to me.
Finally someone who has info that actually is useful. I like you're top 15 and I'm wondering what you think of the Pitt- Duke matchup, I cant understand all the love for Duke, I have Pitt winning by 8-12 pts, so Pitt covering 4pts seems safe to me.
Well, i said I had them as 'Top 15'. And in order to validate my case I am making the argument of, worst case, you are looking at #15...
Most people here would make the Georgetown argument and then drink the Kool Aid on the team they are supporting and say 'they are #4 soon to be #1!!!'
Statistics in sports are like a lamppost to a drunk. They provide support, not illumination.
but here goes...in no particular order
Kansas, Arizona, Syracuse, Iowa, Pitt, Florida, Michigan State, Kentucky, Okie St, Creighton, Wichita State, Michigan, UCLA, and of course Duke if playing at home.
No way Wichita State is better then Nova. And honestly I don't think Okie St is either nor Pitt nor UCLA
Well, i said I had them as 'Top 15'. And in order to validate my case I am making the argument of, worst case, you are looking at #15...
Most people here would make the Georgetown argument and then drink the Kool Aid on the team they are supporting and say 'they are #4 soon to be #1!!!'
Statistics in sports are like a lamppost to a drunk. They provide support, not illumination.
but here goes...in no particular order
Kansas, Arizona, Syracuse, Iowa, Pitt, Florida, Michigan State, Kentucky, Okie St, Creighton, Wichita State, Michigan, UCLA, and of course Duke if playing at home.
No way Wichita State is better then Nova. And honestly I don't think Okie St is either nor Pitt nor UCLA
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.