Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
KC +4.5 KC under 44.5 SF -7 SF under 52.5 |
stat13 | 1 |
|
|
Maybe because Boeheim was suspended for nine ACC games this year & they struggled all during that time?
So I guess you were all salty about the Giants when they went 9-7 but won the Super Bowl? Teams do have a tendency to go on hot streaks, you know.
|
Limbix | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DOVJAK: local book had to take bets early today on the 1st game,was working and because of his job ,could not take calls at work thanks for caring about my business Wonderful thing called the internet that lets you search for info you desire. Since Lang posted his plays before 9am EST you could have found out before you were forced to place your bets. Plenty of gambling forums out there that post what those guys are playing. |
DOVJAK | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DOVJAK: oh garbage,I took Houston If you like to fade Lang and/or Root, why the heck did you put your bets in before knowing what sides they were on?
|
DOVJAK | 13 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by bigbadlag] I know it's close but Cincy doesn't have much to play for /Quote]
Yeah, you're right. That 1st round bye doesn't mean much. Especially when their starting QB is out with injury. So I'm sure Cincy isn't thinking that extra week of rest would help Dalton.
|
bigbadlag | 13 |
|
|
GL PC
|
pcollins | 6 |
|
|
GL today PC
|
pcollins | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by fadepublic14: Vegas took an unprecedented Week 1 beating What makes you say that?
|
fadepublic14 | 18 |
|
|
GL PC
|
pcollins | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by suuma: I used the covers consensus to describe the "public opinion" on this game because the OP said it looks too easy. And when the line didn't move since the Brady news and the covers consensus is almost split even, it tells me that the common opinion is not that this game looks too easy for the home side. Noted
|
LFChampions | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by suuma: The line is still 7 because the money split is 50/50. The consensus on contests on this site is almost 48/52. Don't know whether so many people believe it's so damn easy. Good luck though. So you're telling me the consensus on the covers forum accounts for the way the line is or isn't moving? Yeah, no. The consensus on this site accounts for less than 1% of the actual $ being bet on this game. But you are correct in that the real money being bet on this game is split about evenly. Considering the history between these two teams, especially in Foxboro, it does seem too easy to lay the touchdown. So I agree with LFC in that regard.
|
LFChampions | 11 |
|
|
Love the thought process! Things aren't always what they appear.
Good luck tonight
|
LFChampions | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Crashdavis565: Did this line really go from 3.5 to 7? Yes. When it was announced Brady would play the line was moved to -7.
|
Crashdavis565 | 8 |
|
|
FYI - Gradkowski is injured and will not play. Landry Jones will see majority of snaps for Pit.
Which is obviously even better news for your play if you like Vikes.
|
porcelainfist | 92 |
|
|
Lots of YELLING in this thread
|
B00kieKiller | 30 |
|
|
Like losing to Mercer and Lehigh in 1st rd in 2014 & 2012?
|
lajohn | 19 |
|
|
|
RumBunny | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by RumBunny: Will the sunset tonight? It won't in Antarctica
|
RumBunny | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by hillardoh1: dude check out my rsi on the covers contest . I hit over 60% I must be doing something right in college basketball Then why aren't you on PSU in the covers contest?
|
hillardoh1 | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JDub11: Because it means the sharps are on G Tech. LMAO...wow...just don't bet then if you think "sharps" never lose
|
pucku27 | 34 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.