Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
replied to
"The NBA Betting System With Undeniable Proof That The League Is Rigged"
in Systems & Strategies Quote Originally Posted by Mrfixers:
well i found one honest handicapper that uses best way ever to win . Pay him after you win 25% of your winnings thats it cut n try he tells you what games he has an edge with and this guy flat out bankrolled me in NFL going 25- 3 from week 10 89 %%%% omg i said what are you a magiacian he laughed and said NO i just learned how to handicap the nfl long ago. I asked can you teach me ? I'l pay you any price!
HE said sure i'll come up with fair figure we can do this all off season
so i'm waiting for his phone call he is senoir citizen 61 yr old.
after NEW years he said too busy right now planning party and stuff!
Interesting. I have been reading a lot of books on the NFL. So far what I have learned and practiced in the playoffs its 3-0. There are no plays this weekend. The power ratings and such are too close. |
HotShotPicks | 115 |
|
|
Im afraid so. I wish he would have passed his system on to atleast somebody
|
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by glefkb01: Agreed. I hope you post the picks again as well.
Really Hope you come with your picks this year Grateful..... Lets Redeem ourselves from last year!! |
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
I have been looking at a possible system that is 5-0 this year in College football. I don't have the time to back test it. If someone has the time to do this I will let you know the info. |
lucky leo | 3 |
|
|
Good job Grateful. I agree with it all. Vandy its tough to go against an sec team but I like Houston. Ball St looks awesome but with the Mac woes I find it hard to go with them. I will take the points. And judging by the previous games I like FSU more. They had a weak schedule but they demolished the teams. Missouri didn't make Auburn look like a championship team. But what FSU did to Clemson and what Clemson did to Ohio St makes FSU look great.
|
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gratefulbets: I can't agree with that anymore grateful. Some people expect someones hard work for free then complain. I know myself I spent countless hours working on finding successful systems in the NFL. Always tweaking and looking for something that works better. Now I have decided to start a bowl "bible" and spend a lot of time watching conferences vs conferences rather than team vs team. Then use other systems as a filter from there. I know now that the Mac is terrible. Consistently. And I will also see which conferences own other conferences. Today is a great one. Big Ten (usually weak) vs SEC (usually strong). But both qbs are out for the SEC teams. I am gonna try to look deeper into the conference vs conference scenario over the summer.
First, this Bowl system is EXACTLY as it was last year. Why would I change a system one iota that after years of tweaking eventually went 6-0?
Second, the "tweaking and tinkering" with both the nfl and college plays produced a lot of net wins, and hopefully will continue to do so.
Third, I posted my basic system in last year's thread. If it's not detailed enough for you, then you'll just have to spend a little more time educating yourself and maybe come up with your own system that you can share with the forum…the opportunities are many.
Fourth, Ive been on this site for many years, and I really don't like all of the sh8 that goes down in the main forums. This IS a system AND there is even a system of values for picking these plays that is tied to the line changes, which is outlined in the first post, which anyone can use.
Fifth, perhaps if you complain enough you might be able to get this thread closed and then you will have contributed greatly to this forum, because we all know how much prime real estate I'm wasting here.
|
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
LOL No kidding. I got my bets in early and let Arizona ride.
|
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by glefkb01: Judging by these trends this is the odd year out. Where everything changes. I am currently trying to compile a bowl game "bible". I am going back and checking previous results. Most bowl games slate these matchups. SEC #4 VS Big 10 #3. So it won't be hard to go back and check to see if the SEC fourth best team owns the big 10 3rd best and so on. I think if we did this and everyone compared notes in a thread that could be some pretty good info right there. Cause lets face it SEC is a good conference. Its showing again. There #4 team is probably better than most conference #1 teams. We check this back and for every conference and bowl. Could be valuable.
did u see these trends off the frontpage:
Big 10: 12-3-1 off back-to-back losses (Michigan and Minnesota)
Big 12: 2-8 as dogs versus .750 or greater opponent (Texas and Texas Tech)
CUSA: 10-3 as dog 7 or more off a win (Rice)
MAC: 1-7 off loss of 8 or more points (Buffalo and Northern Illinois)
MWC: 1-6 versus .800 or greater opponent (Utah State)
PAC 12: 1-11 favorite 6 or more points versus opponent off a loss (Arizona, Arizona State and Oregon)
SEC: 1-8 as a favorite of 8 or more points (Texas A&M) |
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gratefulbets: Yes a great way to look at it as I do is this. Big 10/ MAC Big Brother/ Little Brother. SEC/ACC Big Brother/ Little Brother. Big 10 and MAC suck in bowls and SEC and ACC are pretty good. Just my opinion.
Yes, that would have been an excellent filter. No MAC bowl picks last year for the system.
What is up with the MAC?
|
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
Oh yea they will rebound. I am certain. Plus someone did mention that the MAC sucks in bowls. I think they are like 4-14 last 18. That is something that we can watch for next year.
|
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
Buffalo didn't show up. But that don't mean garbage. Now let the run start. |
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
Thanks Grateful. Lets kick some behind again this year!
|
gratefulbets | 164 |
|
|
definitely something to watch in future. If it starts hot ride it out. If it starts out bad ride in the end
|
Luckydan | 272 |
|
|
I tailed along with your nfl for the first time today. Great job and thanks for posting.
|
gratefulbets | 341 |
|
|
gratefulbets | 341 |
|
||
Thanks! Can't wait for Tuesday!
|
gratefulbets | 341 |
|
|
yes I stumbled across this last year and can't wait for them again. I just noticed the other picks for nfl today when looking for the bowl picks. I will follow them as well. Eagerly looking forward.
|
gratefulbets | 341 |
|
|
Are you gonna post your bowl games this year? If not could you tell me how you get your net values and I could do it from there.
|
gratefulbets | 341 |
|
|
I agree I often have the highest percentage of winners but I don't lay every game no chance to win
|
biff37 | 60 |
|
|
Heck the way I do it is simple and profitable. Just look at the games and lines each day. Look at teams favored by 1-5 points that are playing at home vs a team with a superior record. Also looking at the lines look for an unranked team favored over a ranked team. Or if the team is plus a few points. The team should be at home. Don't go betting every one just bet 1-3 a day. It will be profitable. The best day I think to do this is on saturdays. |
tex191 | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.