Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Flyers took 2 of 3 home games against Pitt duriny last seasons regular games. Also had their number in the playoffs too. Should be a tight game but I'm leaving Philly.
Also, watch for the over to hit quite often for these first few games throughout the league. |
Covers | 17 |
|
|
Zona -9.5 son. Nevada is garbage. Zona ain't much better. But I got nothing else to spend money on today.
|
Covers | 60 |
|
|
Luck almost beat him into the endzone. That garbage was funny
|
einyx | 9 |
|
|
Because the Lions have no interest in winning bro....
|
dannylhuynh | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by GQStatus: Whats easier? To score a td from the 19 line with 31 seconds left on the clock and maybe take it to 15 seconds then onside, recover. Maybe a get a 15 yard slant route and then hit a 45-55 yard field goal. Or Hit a FG at the 19 line with 31. Kick an onside kick, recover with 20 on the clock and go 45-55 yards for a TD. Its easier to score a TD, 19 yards out then 55 yards out. You can kick a 55 yarder. So much suspicion in that game its unreal. Games over either way. It was just a kick in the balls i wasn't ready for. Agreed. The HORRIBLE, NON-EXISTENT secondary of the Pats on that last drive, combined with the, AT THE VERY LEAST, questionable call to kick the field goal there, is highly highly suspicious. The casual fan, non-betting fan won't notice. But that garbage was sketchy dude.
|
GQStatus | 27 |
|
|
Real sketchy right there. Completely let them throw down the field. Blew my -7.5 bet in 30 seconds. darn that was weird bro.
|
Bancroll | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine: Disagree with the call completely.... Nothing to disagree with that. Photo evidence son.
|
HookEmHorns22 | 302 |
|
|
Rain Rain Rain. Leaning Under.
Definitely playing the Eagles.
|
Covers | 85 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits: And with the psychic visions I was mentioning just incase anyone is wondering...I cant force them. So trying to think about it too much will just result in overthinking it...and imagination is psychic's worst enemy. In other words, to get an accurate psychic vision, you must ask the question to what you wish to know (Ask your god, it doesnt matter which god you believe in, as long as you believe in a higher power) and then forget all about it and wait for the answer to come to you. If it doesn't come then it doesn't. Never try to force it. I find I get the best visions when I allow them to just come. It's not easy to be psychic that's for sure. Takes a lot of practice and there is no such thing as a perfect psychic or perfect human being. That is because nothing is random. If things were random, we would of "Randomly" had perfect people, perfect streaks (like 200-0) in sports, etc. This is my best argument to try and prove that nothing in the universe is random. Everything has a pattern.. You can call it "Random" but it's not the correct word. That word shouldn't even exist, because it's misleading. Randomness is infact just a bunch of patterns. So it can be predicted. For instance, with Roulette. The common misconception is that each spin of the wheel is independent and therefore it's random....first the spins are not independent. But that is another conversation so won't go into that here. But most importantly what you need to know is that if the game was truly random and every spin had equal chance to hit red/black, then that would mean you would see streaks or could see streaks of 50 blacks or reds hitting in a row. This is so plain as day to me it's surprising I even have to argue this with people. The law of averages may be a good way to explain it? It's just NOT possible to hit 50 blacks or reds in a row unless it's rigged. This is because it's NOT random, so therefore there is no chance of hitting 50 blacks. True randomness, there certainly would be a chance..and it would happen sooner or later. The law of averages has limits. For instance out of billions and billions of spins on the roulette wheel, I believe the longest Black/Red streak ever was in the 20's. That's easily possible since you have different dealer's, dealer signatures, and the law of averages. But again there is nothing random out there, so I hope you all understand that when it comes to gambling...because it can help you tremendously to make money and be professional with this, if you understand how it all works. This guy. I'm not sure you quite know what random really means bro. Too much shit in that to start addressing everything, but to this: Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits: It's just NOT possible to hit 50 blacks or reds in a row unless it's rigged. This is because it's NOT random, so therefore there is no chance of hitting 50 blacks. True randomness, there certainly would be a chance..and it would happen sooner or later. First of all- you probably shouldn't have used roulette as your example for flawed thinking in terms of randomness. Second, it is most certainly possible to hit 50 blacks or reds in a row. You would just need an infinite number of samples (spins) to do so. Most statisticians would say that this is in fact random. Same with coin flips. Yes, there are many variables that may determine which side it lands on at any given time- wind speed, power of flip, etc. But given an infinite number of flips, you will find that it lands equally on heads or tails.
|
Covers | 98 |
|
|
Fucking crazy catch right there. Dayum!!!
|
LETGOPACK1234 | 939 |
|
|
jamesrharrison4 | 59 |
|
||
Quote Originally Posted by SideWithTheBook: Good point. Thanks for the correction. Besides that, your point was still valid.
|
miniman44444 | 11 |
|
|
My bad
https://www.vegasinsider.com/nfl/odds/betting-trends/texans-@-jets.cfm/date/10-08-12/time/2035
|
jamesrharrison4 | 59 |
|
|
Vegas Insider has 79% on Houston son.
|
jamesrharrison4 | 59 |
|
|
Same
|
capskip | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jplimin: Things that make ya go hmmmmmmmm, Everybody keeps talking about how Joe Q. Public is on Houston, yet in this forum all you see is a lot of people taking Jets because think something is up with Vegas. Just to let you know, the cappers posting here most likely do not represent the types of people you could define as "the public." They joined this site because they are already capping at a higher level or they are trying to cap at a higher level. Most likely the "public" consists of Joe-Schmo who bases his picks on ESPN highlights and what Ron Jaworski has to say. BTW, Jets for me too
|
Covers | 150 |
|
|
I'm a homer, but I do genuinely believe Pitt takes it here. Don't think it will be a high scoring game, but believe Philly FINALLY and TRULY gets exposed for the frauds they are. This team should be 1-3, not
3-1. Pitt -3.5
|
Covers | 39 |
|
|
What a drive there by STL. Hey to say I told you so ARI backers..... But I told you so.
|
bb_capper | 10 |
|
|
Looks like the under is gunna hit. Ka-Ching
|
kn0wn | 584 |
|
|
Got +3. I'll take it
|
sniperswife | 10 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.