Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Repeat of the KC game when peyton won in KC.... everyone said the same blah blah blah... KC at home lines to low, trap game... Denver won that 1 too
|
808bigballer | 11 |
|
|
Denver (11-3) has already punched its ticket to the postseason, but a first-round bye and home-field advantage remain at stake. The Broncos can clinch the bye with a win, but would need to jump New England (11-3) in the standings for the AFC's top seed.
Dalton 2-6 primetime. 15td 14int for season. They have not beaten any playoff teams. They have only beaten two teams with winning record. They got blown out by the 2 playoff teams they played by more than 20!!!!! Pitt and Patriots kicked their behind! Peyton 4-0 this year night games! Take Denver 1st half SU and game SU and -3! EZ$$$$$$$$
|
808bigballer | 11 |
|
|
Denver (11-3) has already punched its ticket to the postseason, but a first-round bye and home-field advantage remain at stake. The Broncos can clinch the bye with a win, but would need to jump New England (11-3) in the standings for the AFC's top seed.
Dalton 2-6 primetime. 15td 14int for season. They have not beaten any playoff teams. They have only beaten two teams with winning record. They got blown out by the 2 playoff teams they played by more than 20!!!!! Pitt and Patriots kicked their behind! Peyton 4-0 this year night games! Take Denver 1st half SU and game SU and -3! EZ$$$$$$$$
|
vankiep_0007 | 25 |
|
|
Denver (11-3) has already punched its ticket to the postseason, but a first-round bye and home-field advantage remain at stake. The Broncos can clinch the bye with a win, but would need to jump New England (11-3) in the standings for the AFC's top seed. Cincinnati has been blown out twice in primetime this season, losing 43-17 at New England in a Sunday night game Oct. 5 and 24-3 to the Browns on Thursday night Nov. 6. Denver's primetime results have been quite the opposite. The Broncos are 4-0 in night games this season, most recently defeating Kansas City 29-16 on Nov. 30. |
Covers | 64 |
|
|
if Denver wins out and patriots lose to the bills then Denver gets home field throughout ......thats important imo...gordo
|
Covers | 64 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by GordoPockets:
What is the everything Denver has to play for? And why would Denver have more to play for than Cincinnati? Denver's in the playoffs and Cincinnati is not... They have Oakland at home next weekend, they are going to get the other bye week. Given they are playing for the bye, history has dictated that teams are not always inclined to close it out when they have more games on the schedule. Cincinnati has much more to play for here. But even if they didn't have more to play for, simply coming to the conclusion that they need it doesn't mean that they will win. Be careful with games such as this, they is always big favorite support. try research before talking gordo.....denver is playing for bye!!!! seems important to me!
|
Covers | 64 |
|
|
Easy Money..... Lock up Denver -3
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
|
Covers | 64 |
|
|
Bengals haven't beaten any teams that are going to the playoffs! The best team they have beaten is the Ravens who are probably missing the playoffs, wild card at best. Red rocket got destroyed by Tom Brady in his last primetime game! On the season Dalton is 15td and 14int against mediocre teams. The 2 times against playoff teams they lost by over 20 points pitt won 42-21 and patriots won 43-17! They have only played 4 teams with winning records 2 smashed em and other two houston 8-7 and ravens 9-6 neither were big wins nor are playoff contenders. Its a repeat of pit and patriots.
denver 31 cin 20
|
Covers | 64 |
|
|
ray
|
Covers | 301 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys: Past 21 years of the wildcard round, there has been only 2 times where all 4 favorites won SU, thats 2-19 past 21 years...........that means the odds are against all 4 favorites winning their games SU.............at least one dog will win SU this weekend................. Double digit favorites in the wildcard round past 21 years are 4-1 ATS
the Patriots have not beat a team with a winning record this season & they are the #1 seed & only teams they played with a winning record were the Giants & Steelers & lost both of them.............. Only twice has the #1 seed from either side not been in the super bowl past 13 years. The #1 seed from either conference has been in the big game 11 of the past 13 years & 17 of the past 21 years.
PATRIOTS HAVE NOT BEAT A TEAM WITH A WINNING RECORD?????? REALLY////??????????THEY BEAT DENVER AND HOUSTON - DEN IS 1 SEED PAST 2 HOUSTON 3 GET YOUR STATS RIGHT YOU R ALL OFF BRO
|
PrimeTimeBoys | 114 |
|
|
BRAVES AND OVER CASH IT
|
Covers | 10 |
|
|
replied to
Pats Backers are like a bunch of Snapper Fish who took the Bait and got Hooked
in NFL Betting
Giants missed playoffs since their win in 2008. Giants barely made it to playoffs this year. Pats number 1 seed back to back. Consistency vs giants luck......helmet catch, lucky Eli fumbled into his legs, dropped INT, Pats missed field goal???????????come on, New England is clearly better team and has been!
|
ActionMagnet | 30 |
|
|
FADE THE PUBLIC......VEGAS LOST BIG ON SUPERBOWL LAST YEAR. IT WONT HAPPEN 2 YEARS IN A ROW. EXAMPLE PUBLIC LOVED LSU AND BAMA KILLED THEM! PUBLIC LOVES GIANTS AND PATS WILL WIN AND COVER. FROM TEDDYS WRITE UP ON EXPERTS PAGE....... In the Belichick-Brady era, the Pats are 43-13 SU, 36-17-3 ATS when avenging a loss, including an 18-3 SU, 16-4-1 ATS mark when playoff off three or more wins in a row. Clearly, this team makes good adjustments and uses their extra time to prepare wisely.
|
jwub91781 | 21 |
|
|
FADE THE PUBLIC......VEGAS LOST BIG ON SUPERBOWL LAST YEAR. IT WONT HAPPEN 2 YEARS IN A ROW. EXAMPLE PUBLIC LOVED LSU AND BAMA KILLED THEM! PUBLIC LOVES GIANTS AND PATS WILL WIN AND COVER. FROM TEDDYS WRITE UP ON EXPERTS PAGE....... In the Belichick-Brady era, the Pats are 43-13 SU, 36-17-3 ATS when avenging a loss, including an 18-3 SU, 16-4-1 ATS mark when playoff off three or more wins in a row. Clearly, this team makes good adjustments and uses their extra time to prepare wisely.$$$$$$$$$$$$$ CHECK MY RED STARS B4 YOU RUN YOUR MOUTH LIKE U ARE A WINNING CAPPER |
PrimeTimeBoys | 187 |
|
|
FADE THE PUBLIC IN BIG GAMES...............REMEMBER SAINTS AND GBAY THIS POST SEASON????? ILL TAKE THE BETTER COACH AND BETTER QB AND MOST CONSISTENT TEAM OUT FOR REVENGE!! NYG BARELY MADE THE PLAYOFFS AND CHOKED AT HOME TO WAS 23-10 WHEN THEY NEEDED A WIN TO MAKE PLAYOFFS
|
PrimeTimeBoys | 187 |
|
|
PLEASE PICK YOUR WINNER AND THE SCORE AND BRIEF REASON WHY.......
PATS 31 NYG 27 THIS GAME WILL BE SIMILAR TO GBAY @ NYG THIS SEASON ON DEC 4. WHICH WAS GBAY 38 NYG 35. SINCE ITS A NEUTRAL FIELD AND ITS ON THE BIGGEST STAGE AND THEY HAVE TWO WEEKS TO PREPARE I WOULD SUBTRACT AROUND 10-13 POINTS. GIANTS HAVE PLAYED VERY WELL BUT HAVE ALSO PLAYED BAD .... LOSING TO WAS 23-10 AT HOME UNDER PRESSURE OF MAKING PLAYOFFS. I WILL TAKE THE MORE CONSISTENT TEAM WITH THE BETTER COACH AND BETTER QB WITH A CHANCE OF REVENGE AT THEIR FINGER TIPS ON THE BIGGEST STAGE.
|
GAIMDAY_LUKE | 3 |
|
|
PreSeason not in the individual game. This season Pats and Gbay open +750 each. I played 500 on Pats ( 5dimes line )
|
Saulb998 | 74 |
|
|
Interesting Fact............
Belichick and Brady have gone 0-3 against the spread when listed as Super Bowl favorites.
|
Saulb998 | 74 |
|
|
I do like Patriots to win the Superbowl by 3 or more. I wish I knew Billy Walters picked them also but he doesnt make his Superbowl picks this quick. When he does play it it will prob leak but doesnt mean its a lock. He bet 1 million with Phil Ivey on Indy VS Saints, he choose Colts. ( which he lost )
|
Saulb998 | 74 |
|
|
Why do you acted like you know Billy Walters pick on NE when you really dont know jack?????????????
|
Saulb998 | 74 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.