Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wrong.
Auto Over.
|
kmoney85 | 10 |
|
|
Confused by the "clutch in playoff games in places like Pittsburgh and New England" comment.
2008 @ PIT - 13/30 for 130 yards, 0 TD, 3 INT 2010 @ PIT - 16/30 for 125 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT Both losses. 0-2. Far from "clutch" performances. 2009 @ NE - 4/10, 34 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (Rice dominated that game) 2011 @ NE - 22/36, 306 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT (Finally "clutch" vs a bottom 3 defense" 1-1 vs NE. Ironically, the game he sucked in, he won. The game he played good in, he lost. Not really sure what that comment meant?
|
Stuckey | 115 |
|
|
Statistics.
|
Neef | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by shark_apreza: you have a point here..... we dont need to go further--- lamichael james , last year road runner from oregon has done shiet in the 49ers.... why?? because he lacks the size,speed and strenght to play as a power back or a RB in the nfl , i know the saints have sproles, but the niners would need to find him a use just like the saints found for sproles , orgon ducks runners have great succes because at the college level they dont need to have much weight or to be a freak of natures, to execute, they need to be , strong, but light and elusive.... in the next level to succeed kelly will need 2 adrian petersons, an RGIII-,cam newton,Kaepernick-,russel wilson, type of QB , a heavy and disciplined o-line that withstands the speed of the uptempo offense and with huge depth, wich at the NFL level will take a huge toll to play at fast tempo because of the speed of d-lines, lbs, and not to mention the strenght of the hits and blows ....... James hasn't done anything (yet) because he is a rookie who has Gore and Hunter (for the first 11 games) ahead of him on the depth chart. I'm sure SF was thinking, "boy, this kid lacks speed, size and strength...let's draft him in the 2nd round!" when they selected him last year. That's a pretty idiotic statement to make at this point in his career.
|
packers1992 | 30 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by drewsmooth: I'm so Frikkin Confused with all this Garbage. I wish I knew who Bigeast was on Tonite.... I need a lil help to get back in Black. @Big_East
|
BigEastExpert | 467 |
|
|
|
JoeyPublic | 6 |
|
|
|
JoeyPublic | 5 |
|
|
|
Getty3 | 12 |
|
|
replied to
NFL_Sharp Week 16 Picks, Rankings, and Projections (35-18-2 Sides YTD, 66.0%)
in NFL Betting |
NFL_Sharp | 41 |
|
|
replied to
JETS +2 now -1? ANYone have ANY INFO on Money or BET % to JUSTIFY HUGE SWING
in NFL Betting
Syndicates manipulating moneyline to guarantee profit.
|
OneBloodyBoto | 4 |
|
|
|
AFNfootballnerd | 683 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by robbypark: There are inevitably going to be some individuals that are placing a wager on the San Francisco 49ers tonight. Just don't do it. Folks, there are no angles, trends or whatever to look at. The fact is, any amateur football fan should be able to tell you that you never ever ever ever bet against Tom Brady at home in December. You just don't do it. He's just too good and his will is just too strong that they pretty much never come up short. It doesn't matter who they play. JUST DON'T DO IT. If you are going to bet, bet the Pats. Google Circadian Advantage.
|
robbypark | 56 |
|
|
Any look into Circadian Advantage?
|
LeagueCapper | 23 |
|
|
Dumb a$$
|
hienie | 12 |
|
|
FYI: Calvin Johnson is still playing in the NFL.
|
Popo21 | 7 |
|
|
|
JoeyPublic | 10 |
|
|
|
Lundegaard | 8 |
|
|
replied to
NFL_Sharp Week 15 Picks, Rankings, and Projections (32-14-2 Sides YTD, 69.6%)
in NFL Betting |
NFL_Sharp | 56 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by best_bets: I wish I could help you but nobody can. G _____415. If MONEY is your middle name you will be missing tomorrow. An apb for MONEY will need to be posted because you will have lost yours. BOL I'm guessing you don't like money too much best_bets? Your colon hole must appreciate the a$$ f*cking it has taken tonight.
|
GMONEY415 | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by RuberBunsNStikR: Houston and the Under. This looks like a line movement trick that mirrors the SF vs Chicago line movement trick that favored the SF. Going from -3 to -6 and it didn't matter. Expect the opposite outcome tonight! ???
|
Pasteur | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.