Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Regardless whose playing today between Marshall (C-USA) & Maryland(ACC)...
My opinion: Offense: -Marshall has more TD's this season in their conference w/ 36 TD's. -Maryland has lost a few good players due to injury, but there QB is legit in the ACC and he find his go-to guys, they will come out and compete @ 2:30. Defense: -Maryland D isnt that great in ACC, which will allow points on the board. -Marshall doesnt have a defense as well so more points will be on the board. Im liking the OVER PS: took Maryland for the 1sthalf play (-2) |
Covers | 29 |
|
|
..
-BALT=spread (Over due for a WIN, plus @ home) -RAMS=spread (Feeling salty from last week losing @ home vs TENN) -Dal/NO=OVER(OVER is over due for this Sunday match-up) LET$ GET IT!!!!!!!! |
CJJ307 | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by weeks: If Kansas City score 32 points I`ll go down on you pause (no person)!!!!! |
wa11street13 | 39 |
|
|
How ironic...
EJ Maneul(black) rookie QB vs Brian Hoyer(white) rookie QB ***Both teams coming off of a WIN this past weekend*** | Week4 | Bills 23 vs Ravens 20 Bengals 6 vs Browns 17 This is going to be a tough match-up game but my prediction: Bills +4 plus OVER No Defense from both teams and the this THURSDAY both teams history shows they are DUE for an OVER!!!!!!!!!! GL to everyone |
Europa | 36 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KobezKing: I just find it hillarious when he says 60% on one team and no way vegas takes hit. 60% of bets mite be on that team but doesnt mean 60% of money is. Stop trying to act like ur super sharp and everyone else is dumb. If 60 people bet 100 each on the game but the other 40 people bet 300 a game then where is the money really??? Just remember the sharps bet larger amounts than public joes so % dont mean much Exactly...Im glad someone phuckn said something, dumba$$ wanna-be a SHARP but cant cuz dont rely on public! |
slick15 | 127 |
|
|
so aint $hit for that SLICK-RICK!*
|
slick15 | 127 |
|
|
Slick15...Im actually giving u credit...If u wana call ppl out u should leave the forum.
-I wish I personally wagered w/ u that Vikes will cover cuz u sound to sure of urself..Anytime someone feels that way they LOSE their prediction and ultimately makes an A$$ by assuming that.. I really dont care how many posts u have or what ur title is...U win some U lose some...so aint garbage for that SLICK-RICK! |
slick15 | 127 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DaSaltySluG: I find when people say teams are desperate they're not... I've tried that method in the past but both teams go out there to win. I'm not saying don't pick Vikes but have more of a solid reason why or else you might lose a lot of money thinking teams are desperate when they're just playing football. GL tho I understand what ur saying "Teams are desperate they're not"..But Y not, your 1st win says alot especially for your team's chemistry. Especially Vikes losing to Bears by 1pt(crucial late seconds loss). -AP loves running on Defensive teams cuz they have NO answer for him. Being "Desperate" for your first game is the same as earning a W to move past the other loses that occured w/ the 1st 2 games of the season. -Any feedback! |
slick15 | 127 |
|
|
Honestly Slick15, Ive been following ur picks for a while and u haven't let me down...But I do have to way in on this pick w/ the Vikings vs Browns..
1st)We both know the public's percentage doesn't dictate our wagers..just cuz 76% is going for the Vikes that automatically doesn't imply the Browns will cover. 2nd)Im a defensive-mindset guy..so wit that being said Browns D does look promising since only holding there first 2 competitors(MIA&BAL) to under 20 pts each...Vikes have a better offensive(running) game than both MIA & BAL but Vikes D is not consistent which will give up points but Browns will not put more on the scoreboard than MIN. 3rd)Vikes are looking for there 1st WIN of the season and at this point they are desperate. -Any feedback! |
slick15 | 127 |
|
|
Nice picks Slick15...Any thoughts on the Vikes vs Browns? Everyone is going for the Browns but obviously we ALL know y we should go for the Browns but y not Vikes. Vikes QB-Ponder is a solid QB when at home and Browns D do seem like a legit reason to call the game to be close but Browns D wont last for the whole game maybe the first 2Qts but not the 2nd Half. Just my 2cents lol
|
slick15 | 127 |
|
|
MYbokieCUTmeOFF | 29 |
|
||
Any feedback on the Ravens vs Browns matchup, since Vegas have Ravens -7 ?
|
CMJohnson1 | 54 |
|
|
Im not discouraged b/c it is the 1st game of week 2
But looking forward to this weekend! Record: 0-1 Learning experience what everyone goes through |
B-More17 | 4 |
|
|
I might be a freshmen on NFL Betting Forums, but u dont need to post ur picks to reAlize u how to play this "game"..
My vision picks for 2nd week: | ATS | --------- *NE -12 (Dont worry bout the injuries, Vegas assumes the public going for Jets DUE to injuries, Brady dont need no special just a WR and a RB to catch n run the . *BAL -7 (Bmore -7 is a wise choice, reigning def going for points this game especially they're coming back to M&T Bank(1st home game) and NO way J.Harbaugh is letting his boys lose 2x after earning a ring a couple of months ago) *CAR -3 (Carolina does better on the road, especially the up Northeast states) *KC -3 (Cant believe Im saying this but it ONLY took a new coach, a new QB, new additions to the D and KCity is dangerous SLEEPER team under the radar(prolly losing in the 1st or 2nd round of playoffs) | UNDER/OVER | ----------------------- PHI -52.5 OVER (Coach Kelly knows how to run over 70+plays, equals pts for Philly and since their D is suspect then the points.) SEA 44 UNDER (Both teams are top 2 Defense teams in the league when healthy but another tough game with hesitation of throwing down the field from both QB's) Play w/ ur head not ur heart = & Please advise,send comments...lets start a SEASON discussion! |
B-More17 | 4 |
|
|
...Bmore -7 is a wise choice, reigning def going for points this game especially they're coming back to M&T Bank(1st home game) and NO way J.Harbaugh is letting his boys lose 2x after earning a ring a couple of months ago..
|
Metallica2467 | 77 |
|
|
I might be from Baltimore, but I still like to the PATS compete and Jets are not trusting Geno Smith just cause he won them 1 game..Both D's are suspect and the Over/Under has at least dropped 2pts since Tuesday. Either Vegas is pulling some strings or just phucking wit our heads but...
My vision: PATS -12 UNDER (I hate UNDERS but I dont play wit my heart like most, play wit research and gut instance) ~Tha Truth |
Covers | 52 |
|
|
Hey talesfromdcrypt,
That's a wise strategy, cuz we have plenty of ?? left, it will only get better!
|
talesfromdcrypt | 24 |
|
|
Great Job LawsonJames..Where ever this NFL Train is going Im coming on board. I won't be those ppl who get on a wagon(bandwagon) the end of season
|
LawsonJames | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Damon102: Beware Big Forehead, last year was a gift Wat r u talking bout "last year was a gift"...Ravens definitely earn the ring...Just look at the moon cuz that the only vision u have! |
insatiable | 25 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by amd: Hows the Ravens secondary looking? Isnt Dallas Clark and Stokely about 50 yrs old? The only reason theyre in the lineup is because noone else is available. 2nd-dary looks solid based on preseason since our secondary has changed from winning the Super Bowl..(everyone knows y (Ed-Reed gone)) Cant look at Stokely's and Clark's on age in this situation, look at experience and reliability ...Pitta is injured so we have to have options Just saying.. |
amd | 100 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.